Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 04:29 PM Apr 2016

Why big crowds don’t equal big votes for Bernie Sanders

But we knew this, right?

Earlier this month, 15,000 people packed into New York’s Washington Square Park to hear US Senator Bernie Sanders. It was the largest rally for any candidate in the New York presidential primary — until 28,000 people came to hear Sanders in Prospect Park in Brooklyn a few days later. That was the biggest rally of Sanders presidential campaign.

On Tuesday, Sanders lost the New York primary to Hillary Clinton by 16 percentage points. Sanders not only lost Brooklyn, but he also lost the neighborhood where he grew up.




http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/04/21/why-big-crowds-don-equal-big-votes-for-bernie-sanders/uuKcKaVV10wJV5m88iiiDP/story.html?s_campaign=8315
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why big crowds don’t equal big votes for Bernie Sanders (Original Post) LAS14 Apr 2016 OP
He had more than 15,000 votes in New York!!! Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2016 #1
And no one knows who the voters would have voted for -could have been Hillary or Sanders. riversedge Apr 2016 #5
So far Sanders has 7.7 million votes, that seems like a lot to me. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #2
Not nearly as many as Hillary. Zynx Apr 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #3
Here's one from 2012 JSup Apr 2016 #4
Such bullshit. Sanders has extremely impressive vote totals for a nobody. nc4bo Apr 2016 #7

Response to LAS14 (Original post)

JSup

(740 posts)
4. Here's one from 2012
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 04:48 PM
Apr 2016
Beware the Crowdsmanship: When it comes to campaign rallies, does size matter?

“We are entering the season of crowdsmanship, counting up the people who gather to see the presidential candidates on these autumn days,” political columnist Hugh Sidey observed in a Life magazine article in September 1968. “The prehistoric political ritual is being practiced in 1968 with fresh fervor.”

Unlike some political reporters today, Sidey wasn’t fooled by all the hype, observing, “it is almost worthless as a campaign measure in this age. It may even be worse – it may totally mislead the contenders and the country.”


https://bobmannblog.com/2012/10/29/beware-the-crowdsmanship-when-it-comes-to-campaign-rallies-does-size-matter/

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
7. Such bullshit. Sanders has extremely impressive vote totals for a nobody.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 05:39 PM
Apr 2016

Especially someone who wasnt on anyone's Presidential radar a year ago.

That Clinton is still battling this candidate, says way more about her weaknesses than Sanders' strength.

So yea......absolute bullshit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why big crowds don’t equa...