2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary can't win the nomination before the convention
Two things to be mindful of:
First, History
Let's go to the videotape
Superdelegates switching allegiance to Obama
Hillary Clinton is starting to lose her overwhelming lead in superdelegates, the Democratic party officials whose votes she is counting on to help her close the gap with Barack Obama.... After once leading Obama by a 2 to 1 ratio in the superdelegate chase, Clinton now has 241 to his 181, according to the latest Associated Press tally.
Most unnerving for Clinton is the trickle of superdelegates who have defected from her corner to Obama's.
Barack Obama erased Hillary Rodham Clinton's once-imposing lead among superdelegates Saturday when he added more endorsements from the group of Democrats who will decide the party's nomination for president.
Second, Math
Hillary is unlikely to win enough pledged delegates in the remaining primaries to be able to clinch the nomination before the superdelegates can vote at the convention.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/sanders-is-right-on-super_b_9695718.html
Hillary has already won 1,443 pledged delegates in primaries and caucuses.
(This is 538's count as of last night. Other sources report slightly different numbers; Bloomberg says 1,428; NY Times/AP says 1,446. We'll keep it simple and use 1,443.)
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-delegate-tracker/
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html
Based on polls summarized at RealClearPolitics, we are looking at the following in upcoming primaries (I've tried to generally lean toward using the figures that give Hillary a higher percentage of votes; so for Pennsylvania, for example, I used 55%):
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html
Legend:
state---total pledged delegates available---Hillary's predicted take (based on polling)---Hillary's likely delegates yield
CT 55--0.51--28
MD 95--0.58--55
PA 189--0.55--104
IN 83--0.48--40
CA 475--0.48--228
NJ 126--0.53--67
(In other words, for Connecticut, for example, there are 55 total pledged delegates available. Polling predicts Hillary will win about 51% of the votes, meaning about 51% of the pledged delegates will be awarded to her. 51% of 55 means she should get about 28 pledged delegates from Connecticut, based on recent polls.)
total pledged delegates Hillary is likely to win from these 6 states, based on recent polling:
28 + 55 + 104 + 40 + 228 + 67 = 522
That will give Hillary 1,443 + 522 = 1,965 pledged delegates.
There are an additional 13 states & territories that will also contribute pledged delegates, but I haven't seen polling for them, so I can't say what fraction Hillary is currently expected to win. These states/territories are:
DE 21
RI 24
Guam 7
WV 29
KY 55
OR 61
Virgin Is 7
PR 60
MT 21
NM 34
ND 18
SD 20
DC 20
The total yield from all of these latter states/territories is 377. In other words, if Hillary were to win 100% of all the pledged delegates from these states/territories where we don't have good polling, she would take an additional 377 delegates. (Obviously, she won't win ALL of their delegates in reality.)
The magic number to clinch the nomination is 2,383.
Since Hillary's pledged delegates haul is likely to be 1,965 after the 6 upcoming states for which we do have polls, she will need 2,383 - 1,965 = 418 additional pledged delegates from the states/territories for which we don't have good recent polls.
However, as noted above, even if she won ALL of the pledged delegates from those 13 states/territories, she would only get an additional 377 delegates. So she would still fall short by 418 - 377 = 41 pledged delegates.
Of course, anything could happen in the next few weeks. The polls could dramatically change based on a terrorist attack or huge gaffe or something--or the polls could just be wrong.
But if the polls are reasonably accurate and do not significantly change, and if my math is right, Hillary can't win this race by pledged delegates alone. She will have to make her case to superdelegates to stick with her--and they can't vote until the convention.
So any claims that the race is over and Bernie should drop out now are just Hillary camp propaganda. The nominee will be decided in Philadelphia at the end of July at the convention.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)So that argument doesn't help Bernie
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)If you don't like it ..get enough votes to win it... otherwise.. we will see you in Philly... and we will acquire seats of consequence on the Democratic Committee.. and thus we begin the retaking of our party from the DINOs
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Every state left is going to get a chance to vote for SBS.
DWS and the corruption of the DNC will not be allowed to stand if Bernie Progressives gain enough seats.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)That is why we knew before New York that Bernie Sanders lost.
still_one
(92,219 posts)PLEDGED DELEGATES
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)So any pronouncements that the race is over now are highly premature.
still_one
(92,219 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)will vote for who has the has the most pledged delegates.
Tuesday will be the last day that Bernie can even pretend
he's going to win the nomination.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)which is still months away from Tuesday
griffi94
(3,733 posts)That's Hillary.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)first place?
griffi94
(3,733 posts)but they won't set aside aside
an election that's this one sided.
If the pledged delegate count was really close
and all the other elements of this primary
equal then the supers might be a factor.
But this is a blow out.
Hillary is going to be the nominee.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)We are going all the way to the convention. It will be clear to you by then how much the more progressive states in the west do not support conservative candidates like Hillary Clinton.
No more dynasties-No more Bushes and No More Clintons.
GO BERNIE!
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Bernie is already starting to downshift his campaign.
In the last 2 days there have been statements that after Tuesday they'll re-evaluate and see what their
best option going forward is.
After Tuesday his winning will be a statistical impossibility.
On the Sunday pundit shows
Bernie said he realized his path now was very narrow.
After Tuesday it's closed.
He also said of course he would work hard to get as many Democrats
elected in November as possible because nobody wanted
the White House back in conservative hands.
Time for Bernie to be a team player
and help Hillary put this away.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Neither Sanders or Clinton will have enough pledged delegates to hit the magic number before the convention, UNLESS OF COURSE SANDERS DROPS OUT WHICH HE IS NOT GOING TO DO.
Sanders did say his path was narrow but did not say after Tuesday it was closed.
Sanders is going all the way to the convention, as he has told his supporters many times.
If Hillary Clinton cannot stand on her own two feet against one opponent in a primary without constantly having her surrogates step out and say Sanders is hurting her, perhaps she should be the one to drop out. The only one who hurts Hillary is Hillary. It is that judgment thing....
Sam
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)He has lost...he may get out after the brutal beating he will take next week.
brush
(53,788 posts)It's been shown repeatedly that he doesn't do well in states with a large POC demographic.
brush
(53,788 posts)That's the reason for the super delegates. They will go with the person with the most pledged delegates, and in this case Clinton v Sanders the person with the most votes (more than Trump as well, btw).
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)brush
(53,788 posts)His unprecedent 49-1 drubbing in the general though was why the party when to super delegates
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)Sanders pleads with them to give it to him even though he has fewer delegates and lost the popular vote...ey say no Bernie Sander we will not change our minds...he bows out and that is that. Now if he wants to be a jerk about it . They vote for her at the convention first ballot, and Bernie is finished politically..having screwed over all Democrats...but she is still the nominee.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Let's see how this coming Tuesday goes and then I think we'll know a little bit more about the direction of this primary.
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)Pledged and super-delegates vote at the same time, making a distinction now is a meaningless one for the point you are trying to make.
When as in 2008 with Obama, Hillary clinches 2383 of combined pledged and SDs, the race will be as over as it possibly can be prior to convention balloting.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Superdelegates can change their minds about any endorsements at any time. Pledged delegate votes, by contrast, are set in stone. If either candidate were to reach 2383 by pledged delegates count tomorrow, the race would be over. That's the difference. Pledged delegate counts are real right now. Superdelegate counts don't mean anything other than propaganda until the end of July.
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)Is that less likely to occur than a SD changing his mind? Sure, but probably not by very much. Especially when one candidate leads by millions of votes and hundreds of pledged delegates.
Obama set the precedent in 2008, the nomination is clinched to the point that it can be when one candidate can command support from an absolute majority of delegates.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Not when she's wiped the electoral floor with Sanders. To believe they will overturn that margin of victory is asinine and desperate.
This notion that the will of the people should be overturned is literally all you've got left, and it's pathetic.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)They won't switch to back the loser, especially the loser who has spent his whole life deriding their party.
I'm not at all certain why that simple equation confuses so many of you.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)in states Sanders has won, especially in blowout states like WA, AK, HI, UT, ID, NH, VT and the rest.
Thanks for your support. From your mouth to the superdelegates' ears.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)In 2008, super delegates switched to Obama for the simple reason that he was ahead in the pledged delegate count by 102 delegates. Hillary will have triple Obama's pledged delegate count. She' also far ahead in the popular vote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2008
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)The first section of the OP was just to make the point that superdelegate counts don't count until they are cast at the convention.
Superdelegates can say whatever they want prior to then, but until the convention, their pronouncements are meaningless. 2008 proved that point.
What this thread is really about is that this race is not yet over. Hillary does not have the math, despite what the media and Hillary's supporters are claiming.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Where I think you are having more wishful thinking than facts is in your assumption that for all intent and purposes this nomination process is not over. Sanders is entitled to stay until all votes are cast, but he has no realistic path to the nomination. Barring some unforeseen event, Hillary will be the nominee.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)I'm done discussing this with you. You fail to see the reality on the ground.
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)But the outcome is known before hand.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)I thought it was not the popular voters that counted.
It was all about the delegates. Which is it now?
Beacool
(30,250 posts)then maybe super delegates would take it into consideration. That won't happen this year. Hillary is way ahead on both counts: super delegates and the popular vote.
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)have no effect on the reality of the situation whatsoever.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)so that people who might have voted for Sanders in upcoming elections stay home (or vote for the so-called inevitable candidate). If that were to happen, say, if Hillary won 80% of California, that could change the math. Or if Sanders supporters stopped contributing donations to his campaign, that could make it harder for him to continue to remain competitive.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)plus they are running hard to keep ahead of the FBI. It's all a perceptions game.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)What I wrote was more in line what I would tell a Sanders supporter who was getting demoralized to the point of not contributing any more money, not spreading the word, or even not voting for him if the chance is still there. She obviously does not have this wrapped up and we all need to keep that foremost in our minds no matter what kind of demoralizing tripe manages a temporary infection!
mythology
(9,527 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I thought we were well past that false equivalency. At what point is Bernie supposed to surpass Hillary in pledged delegates?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)The only ones who haven't already figured that out are a few of Bernie's supporters.
Sid
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Now it's just sad.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)to be the nominee. Hold on to your hat, because really Progressive Dem states like CA and OR are going to give Sanders a huge number of delegates.
The pressure you're feeling now, to try and intimidate Sanders and his supporters into giving up, is going to be really intense for you as all those progressive states come up to vote, so take care of yourself.
I'll leave you with this, unfortunately for you, pressurizing thought: Sanders has won in the states that have more accurately predicted the eventual Democratic nominee in the last 50 years.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)She's unquestionably going to win pledged delegates. She'll win the super delegates. They will be firmly in her corner both before and after CA.
The race is over.
senz
(11,945 posts)Resist it and stay strong.
Pity those who have no conscience.
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)First, you use poll percent by itself to determine the delegate count. In the case of Connecticut with 51 - 42 there is 7% not accounted. Which would mean 4 delegates missing. 51 should be calculated as a percent of 51 + 42 or 93. The percent would then be 55 - 45. Giving Clinton 30 delegates instead of 28.
DE - 11 * 10
MD - 59 * 36
PA - 110 * 79
RI - 13 * 11
The tally there would be 223 * 161 --> Running - Clinton: 1,666 * Sanders: 1,365
Running - Clinton: 1,709 * Sanders: 1,405
KY - 32 * 23
OR - No Poll Data
Tally is 42 * 42 --> Running - Clinton: 1,751 * Sanders: 1,447
MT - 9 * 12
NJ - 69 * 57
NM - 20 * 14
ND - No Poll Data
SD - 16 * 4
Tally is 359 * 308 --> Running - Clinton: 2,110 * Sanders: 1,755
DC - No Poll Data
Delegates not assigned due to lack of poll data -- 186
With pledged delegates Clinton has 84 delegates more than needed from the pledged group while Sanders is short 271 delegates.
With the current known automatic delegates committed to Clinton the tally would be 2,588. That is 205 more than needed of the total delegates. That doesn't include the 186 that data is not available. As MineralMan pointed out in another post the automatic delegates do not vote after the pledged delegates. They vote as a delegation with their state as one. In the case of California with 475 pledged delegates and 73 automatic delegates they will announce their 548 votes combined. So many votes from the 548 will be for Clinton and so many for Sanders. It will not even be announced votes identified as pledged and for automatic.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)Especially with science.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)That's the basic point. Superdelegate votes do not exist until they actually are cast at the convention.
Even if you reapportion pledged delegate counts to account for missing votes predicted by polling, can Hillary get to 2,383 by pledged delegates alone?
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)7. Roll Call for Presidential Candidate:
candidates have closed, the Convention shall proceed to a roll call vote by states on the selection of
the presidential candidate. The roll call voting shall follow the alphabetical order of the states with the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico and the territories treated as states for the purpose of the alphabetical roll call.
Pledged and Unpledged Delegates are considered a subset of all delegates.
The distribution of votes, delegates and alternates to the 2016 Democratic National Convention shall be in accordance with the following:
B. A base of 3,200 delegate votes is distributed among the 50 states and the District of Columbia according to a formula giving equal weight to the sum of the vote for the Democratic candidates in the three (3) most recent presidential elections and to population by electoral vote. The formula is expressed mathematically as follows:
G. Unpledged votes shall be allocated to provide for the Democratic President, the Democratic Vice President, and all former Democratic Presidents, all former Democratic Vice Presidents, all former Democratic Leaders of the United States Senate, all former Democratic Speakers of the United States House of Representatives and Democratic Minority Leaders, as applicable, and all former Chairpersons of the Democratic National Committee. Such delegates shall be seated with the state delegations from the state in which they have their voting residences.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)More simple math.
Hillary's lead over Bernie in pledged delegates is only 235.
There are another 1,400 pledged delegates that are still up for grabs.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)After Tuesday, his deficit will be even greater.
senz
(11,945 posts)Fight on, Berners! There's too much at stake.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Paul Wellstone.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)They always vote for the Democrat with the most delegates.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)There will come at a time when historians will look back and say the race was effectively over after Super Tuesday just as historians say the Civil War was effectively over after the Battle Of Gettysburg when the Army of the Potomac forced the Confederates to retreat.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)The SDs won't change their votes, because Bernie is losing the popular vote, and SD's don't go against the wishes of the large percentage of primary voters.
Califonz
(465 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)And I say keep them all open!
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)something, anything could happen that keeps your candidate from getting the nomination?
Get over it!
I personally hope Bernie Sanders takes his support to the convention and possibly beyond.
If the Democratic Party was smart, they would deal with it, with him, and with his supporters (including all those Independents and even Republicans who might vote Democratic if they saw a shred of Bernie's character and policies on the Democratic side), and with his policies (from which Hillary has "borrowed" widely to get this far). They would include all of this, versus acting all victorly and excluding this, in pride and in some kind of "retribution".
That is, if they were smart. Unfortunately, I'm not holding my breath.
Time for change
(13,714 posts)would rather see a Republican elected president than have Bernie get control of their party.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Because superdelegates, see.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Gothmog
(145,321 posts)Sanders will not be winning the vote of many super delegates
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)... get your hands on and take it to Vegas - you can great odds betting on Sanders at this point in race. Current 'Vegas odds if you bet on Sanders - 33 to 1. Step right up and bet your house; with those odds you could become millionaire.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Since it is at the convention that a candidate is nominated, of course someone can't be nominated before the convention.
Anyway, if Clinton leads in pledged delegates something like 2175 to 1876, getting her to 2383 is a mere formality. All of these posts about how Clinton isn't likely to reach 2383 prior to the convention are a complete waste of space.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)delegates earned in primaries and caucuses, then her nomination is a metaphysical certainty.
But if she cannot, and as explained already it is highly unlikely she will, then there is no way to be certain before the convention that she will win the nomination.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)LonePirate
(13,426 posts)TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)LonePirate
(13,426 posts)There will be no contested convention. There will be only one candidate still in the race come June 15, if not earlier.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Super Delegate count for Hillary just rose by 41...they are not leaving.