Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Is Seeing Gains In States That Have Yet To Vote
"Sen Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is on the verge of catching up to Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton, if national polls of the primary are any gauge."
Read full story here;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-upcoming-primaries_us_571a7d4de4b0d0042da93713
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 424 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders Is Seeing Gains In States That Have Yet To Vote (Original Post)
awake
Apr 2016
OP
Slipping nationally, slipping in biggest states, slipping by delegates, slipping by millions...
onehandle
Apr 2016
#2
smiley
(1,432 posts)1. They sure covered their butt in that article didn't they?
From the article:
The rest of the calendar doesnt look especially favorable for Sanders, offering relatively few of the caucus states where hes racked up big margins. Modeling predictions give Clinton the edge in most of next Tuesdays primary states.
Regardless, even a notable uptick for Sanders may end up being too little, too late to overcome his current deficit in either pledged delegates or the popular vote.
Setting the narrative for (cough) win again.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)2. Slipping nationally, slipping in biggest states, slipping by delegates, slipping by millions...
...of votes.
But We Can Doos It!
IamMab
(1,359 posts)5. As long as the kids have fun though, right? Because that's what it's all about...
Tarc
(10,476 posts)3. "...if national polls of the primary are any gauge"
Unfortunately, they are not.
The Problem With Bernie Sanders Polling Argument
The numbers are accurate, but both Democratic and Republican pollsters say that they dont mean as much as Sanders says they do.
To be sure, Clinton also makes the case that she would be a stronger candidate in a general election due to her experience and ability to compromise. But Sanders emphasis on the polls is misguided, experts say.
General election polls taken months before voting day have a history of being wrong. According to data compiled by FiveThirtyEight, general election polls taken a year in advance have been inaccurate by more than 5 percentage points in the last 10 out of 14 elections for which there is data.
Even polls six months out are inaccurate, too. For example, at this point in the 2000 election, late April polls showed then-Gov. George W. Bush with a strong national lead of five points over then-Vice President Al Gore. Bush lost the popular vote to Gore by half a percentage point that November.
The numbers are accurate, but both Democratic and Republican pollsters say that they dont mean as much as Sanders says they do.
To be sure, Clinton also makes the case that she would be a stronger candidate in a general election due to her experience and ability to compromise. But Sanders emphasis on the polls is misguided, experts say.
General election polls taken months before voting day have a history of being wrong. According to data compiled by FiveThirtyEight, general election polls taken a year in advance have been inaccurate by more than 5 percentage points in the last 10 out of 14 elections for which there is data.
Even polls six months out are inaccurate, too. For example, at this point in the 2000 election, late April polls showed then-Gov. George W. Bush with a strong national lead of five points over then-Vice President Al Gore. Bush lost the popular vote to Gore by half a percentage point that November.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)4. Hillary's "ability to compromise" moral values is labeled an advantage?
nt