Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:56 AM Apr 2016

Clever tactic

So news trickles out about a Hillary PAC paying to "correct" the record. Many see this as a way to inundate the opposition and squash others voices. The clever part about doing this is the way posters are suddenly asking, "could other candidates being doing this already?"

This is a slick way of smearing the supporters of other candidates and taking away credible arguments. This is just another example of dirty tricks used by politicians that have been making so many people tired of the establishment.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. For me, this just confirms what I already believed.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:04 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary has a special, elevated place in the Pantheon of Dirty Tricks. Remembering 2008, and I was a Hillary supporter back then.
Bernie is not there at all. So, IMO, not a problem.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
2. In the last two elections, Obama had Rapid Response Teams ...
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:09 AM
Apr 2016

which is no different than what Secretary Clinton is doing. In this day and age of instant new cycles and breaking news via tweets, etc ... things like this are a necessity. If you see this as nefarious, you might be a BS cheerleader.

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
3. You're right
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:16 AM
Apr 2016

I am a Bernie supporter. Call it whatever you want, but paying $1 million to have people mislead and intimidate others is slimey, plan and simple.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
6. It's hardly "silly" ... it sounds like good campaign tactics to me
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:38 AM
Apr 2016

It was good when Obama did it ... it is good today.

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
7. He definitely needed it
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:44 AM
Apr 2016

Especially against the Hillary campaign. I will agree you on that. Her campaign has been truly masterful in the art of smearing others.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
8. Actually, it was used mostly against the Republicans
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:54 AM
Apr 2016

And he needed it in 2012 as well ... when he didn't campaign against Clinton.

But we can certainly see why Secretary Clinton needs it, the BS cheerleaders are acting like the Republicans and using their scorched Earth tactics more and more. You would think the BS cheerleaders would be ashamed .. but they're not.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
12. Rapid Response Teams working within the Campaign makes sense..but,
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:07 AM
Apr 2016

this is a David Brock SuperPac Group Paying Outside People to spread disinformation in posting articles against Bernie.

If the Obama Campaign's Super Pak was doing this, I never heard about it and I was hear all through his campaign and surely the Clinton Campaign supporters here would have complained about it.

 

Califonz

(465 posts)
14. All that Hillary's henchpeople have done now
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 11:33 AM
Apr 2016

is make everyone assume that all pro-Hillary posts are from shills.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clever tactic