Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Gregorian

(23,867 posts) Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:34 AM Apr 2016

6

Voter Suppression & Potential Fraud Cost Bernie Sanders New York—Investigation Launched

&feature=em-uploademail

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Voter Suppression & Potential Fraud Cost Bernie Sanders New York—Investigation Launched (Original Post) Gregorian Apr 2016 OP

He lost by 300,000 votes. Dream on. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #1

That number keeps getting bigger and bigger with each retelling. -none Apr 2016 #4

It's a rough figure. She had in excess of a million votes while he had in excess of 700,000. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #5

YOU are the on putting out the numbers. -none Apr 2016 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #2

Because they were all Bernie supporters.... JaneyVee Apr 2016 #3

It doesn't matter rock Apr 2016 #9

#BernieMath ... in no way connected to reality n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #7

Right, someone in some room was able to go thru all the Democratic names and just throw out Sanders seabeyond Apr 2016 #8

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)

1. He lost by 300,000 votes. Dream on.

Reply to Gregorian (Original post)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:36 AM

Apr 2016

-none

(1,884 posts)

4. That number keeps getting bigger and bigger with each retelling.

Reply to Trust Buster (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:42 AM

Apr 2016

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)

5. It's a rough figure. She had in excess of a million votes while he had in excess of 700,000.

Reply to -none (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:44 AM

Apr 2016

Please share with us the exact figures if you wish. My point still stands.

-none

(1,884 posts)

6. YOU are the on putting out the numbers.

Reply to Trust Buster (Reply #5)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:55 AM

Apr 2016

I just posted the observation that that number seems to be growing as time goes on.

Response to Gregorian (Original post)

Kip Humphrey This message was self-deleted by its author.

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

3. Because they were all Bernie supporters....

Reply to Gregorian (Original post)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:40 AM

Apr 2016

I'll be generous and give you a 50/50 split, even though according to polling, Hillary would probably have gotten closer to 60% of those votes, then what?

rock

(13,218 posts)

9. It doesn't matter

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 12:38 PM

Apr 2016

They lost the auto race, now they want to argue about the tires, the road, the gas, the wind, oh yes and the sun in their eyes.

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)

7. #BernieMath ... in no way connected to reality n/t

Reply to Gregorian (Original post)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:58 AM

Apr 2016

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

8. Right, someone in some room was able to go thru all the Democratic names and just throw out Sanders

Reply to Gregorian (Original post)

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 10:02 AM

Apr 2016

supporters.

Are you people for real?

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Voter Suppression & Poten...