Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 07:07 AM Apr 2016

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, Cautious but Confident, Begins Considering Running Mates

Hillary Clinton’s advisers and allies have begun extensive discussions about who should be her running mate, seeking to compile a list of 15 to 20 potential picks for her team to start vetting by late spring.

Mrs. Clinton’s team will grapple with complicated questions like whether the United States is ready for an all-female ticket, and whether her choice for vice president would be able to handle working in a White House in which former President Bill Clinton wields significant influence on policy.

While the nomination fight is still fluid, Mrs. Clinton is confident enough of victory that she has described a vision of a running mate and objectives for the search, according to campaign advisers and more than a dozen Democrats close to the campaign or the Clintons.

She does not have a front-runner in mind, they said, but she is intrigued by several contenders and scenarios.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/politics/hillary-clinton-vice-president.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, Cautious but Confident, Begins Considering Running Mates (Original Post) SecularMotion Apr 2016 OP
She has a pretty great pool to choose from! Lucinda Apr 2016 #1
Yes, the pool in which to select is large. I find it disturbing when a Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #2
Perez or Castro would be my guess. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #3
I completely expect an all female ticket. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #4
She'll be facing enough sexism and misogyny as it is. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #7
LMAO. She's been considering running mates for years. merrily Apr 2016 #5
... smiley Apr 2016 #6
I wouldn't say "curious and cautious", I'd say "presumptuous and prideful" pdsimdars Apr 2016 #8
Look to the White House, Joe Biden is the missing group she needs CK_John Apr 2016 #9

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
2. Yes, the pool in which to select is large. I find it disturbing when a
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 07:30 AM
Apr 2016

Name is mentioned immediately they go under the bus.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
3. Perez or Castro would be my guess.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 07:37 AM
Apr 2016

An argument can be made for picking Brown of Ohio, but I think a relatively young person of color makes the most sense. Booker and Patrick would fit the bill, but I think Clinton would benefit more (in terms of winning the general election) from selecting a Latino member of the Obama Administration. I can't see Clinton picking Warren and don't expect to see an all-female ticket.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
7. She'll be facing enough sexism and misogyny as it is.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 08:46 AM
Apr 2016

I don't see Clinton compounding that by selecting a woman as her running mate. Of course, one could argue that selecting a person of color (male or female) is also risky. But I think a relatively young, male (and moderate) Latino running mate provides a 'balance' of sorts that is most likely to get the Democratic base energized and out to vote.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s Campaig...