Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

[Baobab]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

A Uranium One sign that points to a 35,000-acre ranch owned by John Christensen, near the town of Gillette, Wyo. Uranium One has the mining rights to Mr. Christensen’s property. Credit Matthew Staver for The New York Times

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.


At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.

see original story

.........

GRAPHIC:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/04/23/us/clinton-foundation-donations-uranium-investors.html

[CentralCoaster]

1. Water. Wet.

Clintons. Shady.

[CorporatistNation]

2. Well Of Course It Did... There Was No Other Reason For The Deal!

So where are those friggin transcripts? Oh... and yeah... Hillary has so much "baggage" that it is beyond he pall!

[Baobab]

3. Ted Cruz's wife likely was there at the speeches

so she likely has audio recordings.

Nice thought, huh?

I bet they are just waiting until after she is locked into place as the nominee and Sanders has dropped out.

Seriously.

Why isn't anybody being intelligent here?

[Doctor_J]

4. It's a charity, goddammit! Anyone who says otherwise is a sexist!

[My Good Babushka]

5. Cue the Hillary boosters

You can't prove anything, you can't connect the dots, not any of the dots in this minuscule space right here. Anything in this three inches. Right in here, this area, that includes the Chiclets, but not the erasers.

[OKNancy]

6. year old article, since debunked

These stories and the "Clinton Cash" book and stories caused a tarnish on the New York Times.

It was a right-wing hit job that too many are eager to repeat. Of course in the year since, no one believes a word of it except those with an agenda.

[Gwhittey]

7. Post some links

Post some links instead of just saying it not true. This is what a GOP message board looks like because of the CEC. But now we are dealing with a new CEC a Clinton Echo Chamber.