2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Paul Ryan: Providing Women With Affordable Contraception Is A Threat To The Poor"
Paul Ryan: Providing Women With Affordable Contraception Is A Threat To The PoorBy Tara Culp-Ressler at Think Progress
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/10/25/1087591/paul-ryan-contraception-threat/?mobile=nc
"SNIP.................................................
As Talking Points Memo flagged, the vice presidential candidate cited the popular Obamacare birth control mandate which eliminates cost barriers to contraception by requiring employer-based insurance plans to provide contraceptive services without a co-pay as an example of a threat to the poor Americans who rely on assistance from government safety nets and religious charities:
Nothing undermines the essential and honorable work these groups do quite like the abuse of government power. Take what happened this past January, when the Department of Health and Human Services issued new rules requiring Catholic hospitals, charities and universities to violate their deepest principles. Never mind your own conscience, they were basically told - from now on youre going to do things the governments way.
This mandate isnt just a threat to religious charities. Its a threat to all those who turn to them in times of need. In the name of strengthening our safety net, this mandate and others will weaken it.
.............................................
Studies predict that the health reform laws birth control policy will almost certainly lower abortion rates, since removing the cost barriers to contraception encourages low-income women to choose longer-lasting, more effective forms of birth control that lower their risk for unintended pregnancy. And women themselves report that they value access to birth control because it helps them achieve economic autonomy for themselves giving them the ability to finish a degree, keep a job, or support their family when they know they cannot afford the cost of another child. In Paul Ryans mind, however, the social safety net is weakened by fewer abortions and enhanced economic mobility.
..................................................SNIP"
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)they think they are always in a circle
applegrove
(118,696 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)But what the hell do I know?
Sophiegirl
(2,338 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)catbyte
(34,403 posts)Large poor families are better than small ones. WTF?
left is right
(1,665 posts)--left is right
catbyte
(34,403 posts)Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)infidel dog
(273 posts)MizzM
(77 posts)There is no figuring the convoluted mind of the species known as Republican.
GallopingGhost
(2,404 posts)CBHagman
(16,986 posts)Actually, I know what Ryan is referring to: the suggestion that religiously affiliated groups/institutions will shut down and/or cut back in the face of the contraception mandate. Mind you, I'm not saying I believe that's true (Many states already have a contraception mandate, and Catholic groups in those places sometimes self-insure), just that I've seen one example of a group withdrawing health care coverage in the name of conscience.
The case I'm thinking of is that of Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C. The group decided not to offer spousal health insurance at all because of same sex marriage.
[url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/02/catholic-charities-drops_n_482388.html[/url]
Never mind that it's virtuous thing to provide health care coverage to everyone, gay or straight, married or unmarried, sexually active or celibate.
Anyway, during the contraceptive coverage brouhaha, some clerics and others made noises that the fight might cause charities to shut down, yada, yada.