2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary campaigned for Alison Grimes who openly opposed the assault weapons ban.
Make up your mind Hillary.
Grimes mentioned her longstanding invitation to meet McConnell at a gun range, before saying she opposes banning assault weapons but is open to considering changes to how guns are purchased at gun shows. "You shouldn't have different standards when you go to a gun store versus a gun show," Grimes said.
Grimes said she is a "big supporter" of the 2nd Amendment and does not believe that banning weapons "is the way to actually reduce the violence that we see here in the US." Instead, she said, the government should work harder "to make sure we educate people and that we enforce the law."
When the Herald-Leader submitted a questionnaire to the Senate campaigns in May, Grimes responded to a question about requiring background checks at gun shows by saying that she supports "reasonable background checks to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill." She said at the time, "However, these efforts should not infringe upon the right of law-abiding Americans to possess firearms."
Source: Lexington Herald Leader on 2014 Kentucky Senate race , Sep 25, 2014
http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Alison_Grimes_Gun_Control.htm
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Unlike St. Bernard the Sanctimonious.
think
(11,641 posts)how to pick them....
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)than Bernie opposing the NRA on ALMOST all major issues?
You pretty much give up your moral outrage rights when you rationalize support for conservatives like Grimes and Strickland.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)not from st hillarious the compulsive!!!!! nooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)...just really? That is amazing, do you take yoga? To be so flexible to go from unimpeachable anger at Bernie's vote, to unimpeachable anger at Bernie not supporting someone that supports that? In a world as black and white as yours, you would thing contrast would be an important think, you may need to adjust your tube tv to get the joke.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)We'll all be much worse off for that.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Yet another post that shows what a true greek tragedy our system has become. (see what I did there)
still_one
(92,371 posts)and that is the consequences of not supporting the down ticket
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Flexible morals
djean111
(14,255 posts)Not presidential material in any way, IMO.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)otherwise we get nothing.
DeeDeeNY
(3,356 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)think
(11,641 posts)she'll gladly take the opposite position and be for guns if that will help her win.
How anyone could trust someone like this is beyond me....
MattP
(3,304 posts)think
(11,641 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)Silly Hillary, trying to get Democrats elected in red states.
think
(11,641 posts)uponit7771
(90,359 posts)... of good or adequate is Podium Bird thinking
dawg
(10,624 posts)Instead of the two Republicans who *do* represent my state.
think
(11,641 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)Oftentimes we have to deal with the choices we have rather than the choices we wished we had.
I voted for Bernie. I preferred Martin O'Malley, but his campaign was already suspended by the time my state primary rolled around.
But I do not find any fault in Sec. Clinton for endorsing Grimes.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)But, I'm stuck with Bill Nelson and Little Marco. And the Establishment folks are endorsing a "Rubio with a D".
Fuck that.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)Just concede rather than support a middle-of-the-road Democrat, who would still be a mile to the left of the alternative?
MisterP
(23,730 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)is how we get to be a permanent minority party.
But at least we'll be right.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)and that's under Rahm and DWS alone: it's *caused* by the constant rightward shift and its rationalizing--I've never seen an *exciting* neolib or fence-sitting hedger, have you? they're bland yuppie technocrats or sustained only by massive cash infusions (often taken from the liberal candidacies)
they can't convincingly say why their GOP opponent is wrong because either 1. they agree with them in ideology or 2. they agree with them in fact, passing the very laws they condemn them for the election cycle
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)think
(11,641 posts)their guns is indicative of how low Hillary will go to win....
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)think
(11,641 posts)someone who wouldn't ban assault weapons and couldn't even admit she voted for Obama.
Apparently adults have no values...
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)... their advocacy of one or two non progressive provisions.
It's like not voting cause Sanders voted to give gun corps immunity... that's stupid
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)We just want someone with our interests in mind. Not selling us out at every opportunity.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Even though his opponent was much more progressive including on gun issues.
Strickland has an A+ rating from NRA and voted against the assault weapons ban.
More Clinton Hypocrisy.
Im personally delighted to be here with my friend, and your governor, Ted Strickland, she said. Nobody cares more deeply and profoundly about what happens to people. He did a great job as your governor, and he will be an important voice in the Senate.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)He proposed, as a budget measure, to get rid of maintenance, and janitorial workers in state office buildings to cut costs. He would have replaced them with prison inmate labor. And a lot of DUers at the time applauded this as a great idea. It shows the true mindset of Hillary supporters.
This is probably where Noot Gingrich came up with the brainstorm idea to replace school janitors with teenage students.
Vinca
(50,302 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Considering who her opponent was it was a perfectly wise choice to endorse her. Mitch McConnell is disgusting.
Plus, Grimes never ran as some sort of moral superior like Sanders is. Her positions were clear from the start.
think
(11,641 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Besides, Grimes isn't running from President and her race is over, so it's all a moot point.
think
(11,641 posts)apparently it isn't....
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Plenty of people support an assault weapons ban, but there are other key issues that a Democratic Senate would be beneficial on, which is why Grimes received support. Considering that Sanders is from the most liberal state in the union, there is no excuse for him being weak on guns.
think
(11,641 posts)She'll say anything to get elected....
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Perhaps it's because Grimes father, Jerry Lundergan, served as the state chair of the Hillary presidential campaign in 2008. Allison Lundergan Grimes is our current Sec. of State. She also serves as the chair of the Kentucky State Board of Elections.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Grimes was the product of the establishment in the Kentucky Democratic Party. The rank and file Democrats in Kentucky didn't want her but the establishment did because she was a good corporate Democrat just like her father. The establishment shoved her down our throats. She didn't win because a lot of Democrats wouldn't vote for her.
radical noodle
(8,012 posts)against freaking Mitch McConnell?
You're reaching and the desperation is showing. Good grief. What a nonsensical post.
think
(11,641 posts)radical noodle
(8,012 posts)I got brochures in the mail supporting Obama saying Hillary would take our guns.
think
(11,641 posts)radical noodle
(8,012 posts)It's just that it means nothing and most people are aware of that.
JI7
(89,262 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)think
(11,641 posts)If Hillary wants to use guns as a major issue she should try to be at least be consistent.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)is that they weren't standing in the way of Hillary trying to become president
ky_dem
(86 posts)and off Elizabeth Warren was sent (I worked on the campaign)
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)blm
(113,083 posts)What does it matter where they are on the left to center spectrum in the general election, it is a CERTAINTY that even centrist Democrats are still WAY to the left of today's Republicans.
think
(11,641 posts)If she's going to support a candidate that opposes an assault weapons ban which is the heart of the gun issue she shouldn't be attempting to smear Bernie who has voted for an assault weapons ban on several occassions,
What's next? Robocalls claiming Sanders wants to take their guns because he voted for a ban on assault weapons?
Seriously. Hillary Clinton is a complete hypocrite.
blm
(113,083 posts)Sorry you believe any variation on positions of Dem candidates is call for hypocrisy on the issue, but, as a GOTV activist I would like for you to explain to me why we should NOT unify as a party in general elections despite varying positions on some issues because, if we do, according to you, we would all be labeled hypocrites on one thing or another.
think
(11,641 posts)for his gun record when it's a million times better than Grimes' record.
If Hillary wasn't making the gun issue a key part of her campaign against Bernie it wouldn't be so ridiculous.
And to smear Obama from the opposite side of the gun issue just takes her hypocrisy full circle.
blm
(113,083 posts)Sanders voters are NOT playing into the Bernie or Bust theme and pretending that every variation is disqualifying. I don't mind Sanders contradictory positions over the last 3 decades during his primary and general races and those of candidates he supported or endorsed over the years. It's expected. Anyone claiming otherwise is not being truthful, imo. It's absurd reaching for a controversy that doesn't exist.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)(Nelson's the guy on the far left)
Response to TheDormouse (Reply #62)
TheDormouse This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)When Hillary got Blanche's endorsement in 2008, she said:
http://blog.4president.org/2008/2008/02/senator-blanche.html
And when Blanche was running for re-election to the Senate in 2010, Bill Clinton told Arkansans how critical it was that they make sure Blanche would keep her job (they didn't).
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)to get her re-elected to the Senate in 2014?
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/109-2005/s219
merrily
(45,251 posts)After all, she wants to be the first woman President. That justifies everything.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Just sayin'...
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)ky_dem
(86 posts)(and I say that having worked as a field organizer for the campaign) - I am still convinced one of the major reasons we lost so badly was because Lundergan Grimes ran practically as a Republican (no firm statement on choice, pro-coal, pro-gun, 'I disagree with Obama on many issues', etc.). It was extremely difficult to get Democrats in the state excited about her as a candidate - the best we could do was channel anti-McConnell sentiment. Also I was pretty much disgusted with myself at the end of it for shilling for such a sell-out, never again.