NY Times: Hillary Is Not Sorry

[laserhaas]

Yesterday, in the New York Times item titled "Hillary Is Not Sorry" - jurno Maureen Dowd attempts to reach out for the human side of HRC, in the hopes that the woman will turn a page and stop being too full of herself.

NY Times reporter points out that Hillary's haughtier may be her downfall;
and ends the article pointing out Obama went against Bush's war - saying it was a terrible idea.

When Barack Obama was warned by some supporters in 2002 not to make a speech against the Iraq invasion because it might hurt his political future, he said he was going to do it anyhow because the war was a really terrible idea.

What worries me is whether Hillary has the confidence to make decisions contrary to her political interests. Can she say, “But it’s a really terrible idea”?

How many terrible ideas is Hillary Rodham Clinton allowed to have, before all U.S. Dems say,

enough is enough?

[br][hr][br]

5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Hillary will only admit she is wrong - when she's lost NY & CA
	0 (0%)
	Bill Clinton isn't helping Hillary
	0 (0%)
	Taking money from Goldman Sachs has doomed Hillary's campaign
	0 (0%)
	Shoving the coronation down our throats - doomed the Queen
	0 (0%)
	She is not trustworthy
	1 (20%)
	All of the Above
	4 (80%)
	Come on, give the woman a break, don't you hate Trump more than her
	0 (0%)
	Laser is = most definitely - a Hillary buststillary
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Sky Masterson]

1. She is a regular William Kristol.

.

[laserhaas]

2. Sad state of affairs

[laserhaas]

3. I've had enuf...already

How about you