2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumUpdated 4/18: New York polling has been remarkably stable over past 10 days.
Last edited Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:10 AM - Edit history (2)
Updated with latest which continues the trend..
=========================
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ny/new_york_democratic_presidential_primary-4221.html
Hillary has ranged from 51-57 and Bernie from 40-43. Amazing consistency. Suggests they have it right.
Looks like a big win for Madam Nominee on Tuesday!
IamMab
(1,359 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)vimeo.com/163178551
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)realmirage
(2,117 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... too much.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Oh, fuckit ... never mind... who am I kidding? I changed my mind! I'm gonna gloat like it's 1999.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)I live in NYC and all the Dems I know are voting for Bernie.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)They can be wrong.
LiberalFighter
(51,027 posts)Delegate split about 140 - 107. (Low estimate)
Clinton from 1309 to 1449
Sanders from 1095 to 1202
Spread from 214 to 247
Delegates Remaining: 1400
DCBob
(24,689 posts)MD and PA are going to go big for Hillary as well.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)vimeo.com/163178551
DCBob
(24,689 posts)A brief summary would be nice.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)The CBS poll covered 3 days, with only the last being collected post debate. It also has the closest spread at 10 points. None of the other polls collected any data since the debate.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)In my opinion, Obama won the debate. Hillary convinced me to vote for him!
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)But Hillary was mentioning him and praising him so much, that I would rather vote for Obama than Clinton!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Policy wise they are much closer.
One was "Yes we can," but didn't, the other is "No we can't," and doesn't do it, but talks a good game!
morningfog
(18,115 posts)need a change from status quo.
appalachiablue
(41,168 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)or most likely no effect.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)then tell me again that Clinton won. Only in a Bizzaro World did she win.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hillary won by being the adult in the room with logical arguments and specifics on proposals. That might be boring to some but to most voters that is what we want.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I thought that she was campaigning for him!
She's all talk, no action.
I guess you want more wars. I guess you want social security to be privatized. I guess you don't want a living minimum wage.
If that's what you want, you certainly deserve it. I only hope that none of your kids are in the military, or you are nearing retirement age, or you don't have to look for a job any time soon.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hillary is our best bet to keep the White House. Its as simple as that.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)but lose the House and Senate. We need both!
Bernie brings others, like it or not.
There ARE RepubliCONs and Independents who will vote for Bernie, and the races down ticket.
No RepubliCON nor any Independent will vote for Clinton.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)There are analysts who think we win back the Senate. That would be huge.
brush
(53,828 posts)continuously. Which is ironic as Sanders should be most aware that he can't get his agenda passed without a dem congress.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)That's the meme coming from Camp Clinton. I know that you are all programmed to say that.
Thank You for the obvious.
We shall see if she continues her "contributions" (I like to call them bribes, because that's what they actually are) when she has lost the primary.
brush
(53,828 posts)the party look at it and don't seem to understand getting the White House without Congresspeople and Senators will get you no effing where.
Democrats know this, independents just turned Dems seem to be not up to speed yet on such an all important matter so they call help to other dems bribes.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 04:51 PM - Edit history (1)
debates, which is a repetition of his usual speech.
His opening was just pathetic. The same, old tired opening which didn't have a single word pertaining to NY.
When he was asked to provide an example how Hillary's had been influenced by Wall Street in her Senate career, he couldn't give one.
Eight debates haven't helped him so far...why would this one be different, when nothing new was presented?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)is that the "same thing" resonates. People listen to that same thing that Bernie has been saying for quite a long time, and know it's true, and must be changed.
Clinton says a lot, but she does nothing for the middle and working classes. She only does what is correct for the upper crust.
I do not want a president that does not have any concern for us. I am not one of the 1%, as she is, and shall not vote for her.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)and hundreds of delegates. Obviously most voters don't agree with your assessment of Clinton. That's because they are right wing smears.
Here are some of her work helping middle and working classes
created Arkansas's Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth
led a task force that reformed Arkansas's education system
Instrumental in passage of the State Children's Health Insurance Program
Promoted nationwide immunization against childhood illnesses
Successfully sought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health
Worked to investigate reports of an illness that affected veterans of the Gulf War (now recognized as Gulf War Syndrome)
Helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice
Initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act
Helped create Vital Voices, an international initiative to promote the participation of women in the political processes of their countries.
Served on five Senate committees:
-Committee on Budget (20012002)
-Committee on Armed Services (20032009)
-Committee on Environment and Public Works (20012009)
-Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (20012009)
-Special Committee on Aging.
Member of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
Instrumental in securing $21 billion in funding for the World Trade Center site's redevelopment
Leading role in investigating the health issues faced by 9/11 first responders.
And there is more. Does this sound to you like someone who does nothing for middle and working classes?
Sanders has had a decades long career with very little to show for it. He is all talk, and I quote you here "for quite a long time".
Hillary has worked hard, starting at a very young age. I can't imagine the reaction here if she had never had a real job until she was 40!
At the age where Sander was pretty much a drifter, Hillary had already done so much work helping the middle and working classes, esp women and children. That's what we need in the WH
George II
(67,782 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Sanders was a drifter, oh well. As far as I'm concerned, that's better than a corporate grifter, and a Goldwater Girl, which was Clinton's way.
I'm not buying your copy and paste propaganda from the campaign.
What about the war that killed thousands of Americans?
Can you explain, in your own words, how this helped the middle and working class without copying and pasting?
It's one thing to copy and paste a person's accomplishments, it's another thing to actually understand them.
The votes that Bernie is behind by correlate to the fact that there are many many fewer voters in caucuses than there are in primaries. This is a bogus "fact." It has very little to do with the nomination. He is only behind by about 220 committed delegates. Superdelegates can waver with the wind.
You keep copying and pasting.
Perhaps someone will believe you.
Oh and don't bother to respond, I put you on ignore.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)What is your problem? do you believe that what I posted were lies?
And come on, the stuff is self explanatory. For example "Helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice" Don't you see how that helped women?
"Initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act" Do you really need explanation for this?
Same with the rest of them.
You know that Hillary has surpassed Obama in PDs?
I'm not replying for your benefit. Go on, hide from the truth.
angrychair
(8,732 posts)The person that 'created' the "office on violence against women" told a 12-year of girl she wanted to be raped.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/clintons-delegate-lead-do_b_9711160.html
Clinton's own words:
I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing, Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.
What happened to that little girl:
"In her interview with The Daily Beast, she recounted the details of her attack in 1975 at age 12 and the consequences it had for both her childhood and adult life. A virgin before the assault, she spent five days afterwards in a coma, months recovering from the beating that accompanied the rape, and over 10 years in therapy. The doctors told her she would probably never be able to have children."
appalachiablue
(41,168 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)to their clients.
Hillary didn't ask for that case. To the contrary, she asked how she could get out of it, when it was assigned to her by a judge. The answer was that she couldn't. Once she had the case, it was her job to listen to her client and represent him. She is not reporting her own views in the affidavit. She was a 27 year old lawyer in a small town who was acting as a court appointed attorney by someone who could not afford a lawyer.
HRC supporters have no issues with her ridiculing a 12 year child saying she deserved to be beaten and raped and made infertile as she was "fantasizing" about older men and "an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.
If this had been Sanders, the world would be on fire right now about this.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)angrychair
(8,732 posts)Those were HRC's words, not her client's words. The accused didn't even know here.
Here is what I find stunning:
Police officers get found "not guilty" in a court of law of killing young black men and it's wrong, miscarriages of justice and dozens of OPs are made to attacking the courts, defense, prosecutor and so on.
Clinton, in her own words, says that a 12-year old child, who was a virgin at the time of the attack, that was beaten, raped and made infertile by an attack from her client, deserved it because of "fantasies" about older men and being impetuous though she was still recovering from the attack at the time.
This "blame the victim" rape culture, even as a legal defense, is disgusting and defending it, while attacking the legal that does directly involve your candidate, is just as disgusting and embarrassing.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)She is representing her client with this statement.
Clinton did not say this child deserved what happened to her.
But it is NOT the job of a defense attorney to assist the prosecution in convicting a defendant; it is the job of a defense attorney to provide a vigorous defense.
angrychair
(8,732 posts)the defense of a client DOES NOT have to include the "blame the victim" slut-shaming. This is no different than the "what were you wearing at the time of the attack" or "were you wearing makeup".
It was unquestionably true she was beaten and raped and dropping the statement about a 12-year old child having sexual fantasies involving older men being related to why she was attacked is disgusting and vile.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)It's their job.
Then it's the job of the jury or a judge to decide on the outcome.
dsc
(52,166 posts)Hitler and Stalin and every dictator who has ever walked the earth.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Hillary was a public defender. She was assigned the case. She requested to be removed from it, but the request was denied, so, she did her job. That is how the system works.
Even the prosecutor in the case defended Hillary over this:
The prosecutor in the case, Mahlon Gibson, defended Clinton in an interview with CNN last month, calling questions over her role ridiculous.
If you are appointed by the court, you damn better do everything you can do to defend them, Gibson said.
Here are some links so you can educate yourself:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/04
/hillary_clinton_defended_an_alleged_rapists_feminist_lawyers_are_right_to.html
http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clinton-speaks-about-defense-of-child-rapist/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/07/hillary-clinton-rape-case_n_5564770.html
angrychair
(8,732 posts)Nothing will make the blaming of a child for being raped and beaten "ok".
This "blame the victim" rape culture is bullshit and that HRC supporters have really been drinking the koolaid to be able to go along with this.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)I don't follow you. but I bet you have a number of posts screaming about mass incarceration.
With the hatred I've seen towards defense attorneys here, it's pure hypocrisy to rant about mass incarceration.
Both defense attorneys and prosecutors must do their jobs the fullest extent of the law.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/04/hillary_clinton_defended_an_alleged_rapists_feminist_lawyers_are_right_to.html
You totally ignored my reply. You are going on pure emotion and hatred of Clinton, without an ounce of reasoning.
But please, answer this...why hasn't Sanders brought this up?
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)[link:http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/04/hillary_clinton_defended_an_alleged_rapists_feminist_lawyers_are_right_to.html|
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)to represent clients who are facing all the power of the state.
Here is what I find stunning:
Police officers get found "not guilty" in a court of law of killing young black men and it's wrong, miscarriages of justice and dozens of OPs are made to attacking the courts, defense, prosecutor and so on.
Clinton, in her own words, says that a 12-year old child, who was a virgin at the time of the attack, that was beaten, raped and made infertile by an attack from her client, deserved it because of "fantasies" about older men and being impetuous though she was still recovering from the attack at the time.
This "blame the victim" rape culture, even as a legal defense, is disgusting and defending it, while attacking the legal that does directly involve your candidate, is just as disgusting and embarrassing.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)claims when she wrote the affidavit. And that was her job as the court-assigned defense attorney.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)The only question is by how much.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)But we'll see.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)You might call it a win, in the land of Clintonistas, but I shall call it a win for Bernie.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)The ones living in a parallel world are not the Hillary supporters.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)any more of what you are imbibing in? I sure could use an occasional break from reality!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The threat from the Soviet state has been remarkably stable over past 10 years.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)If you keep employing the same flawed model, you will keep getting the same mistaken results.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Bernie doesnt do so well with just Democrats.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)from Camp Clinton. I know that is what they have programmed you folks to say, and you are obeying just like good little brown shirts.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I dont get any "memes" from anyone.