Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:24 AM Apr 2016

Updated 4/18: New York polling has been remarkably stable over past 10 days.

Last edited Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:10 AM - Edit history (2)

Updated with latest which continues the trend..



=========================



http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ny/new_york_democratic_presidential_primary-4221.html

Hillary has ranged from 51-57 and Bernie from 40-43. Amazing consistency. Suggests they have it right.

Looks like a big win for Madam Nominee on Tuesday!

85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Updated 4/18: New York polling has been remarkably stable over past 10 days. (Original Post) DCBob Apr 2016 OP
We brought the pollsters into the conspiracy early. They were nearly founding members. IamMab Apr 2016 #1
Ha! DCBob Apr 2016 #2
Damn! Hillary can do ANYTHING!! NurseJackie Apr 2016 #14
Plenty of conspiracies with Hillary... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #61
They've all been bought off by Wall Street!!!!! nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #71
Tuesday's gonna be fun! realmirage Apr 2016 #3
Yep.. cant wait! DCBob Apr 2016 #4
I'll try not to gloat... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #16
You are a better person than I am workinclasszero Apr 2016 #27
Well ... I'll only "try". But I didn't say how much effort I'll put into trying. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #69
Let's cross our fingers. We'd like a big win, after all. Hortensis Apr 2016 #73
And the polls had Bernie losing in Michgan too. One of the 99 Apr 2016 #5
That sounds scientific. With that logic, how could Sanders lose? nt anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #35
Just saying that you can't rely on polls. One of the 99 Apr 2016 #46
That will push Clinton up by about 30 to 40 delegates LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #6
And then next Tuesday its gets even worse for Mr Sanders. DCBob Apr 2016 #12
The question is, how can it get better for Clinton considering this... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #62
I dont have time to watch that.. DCBob Apr 2016 #66
Almot none of it is post debate. Odd Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #7
She won the debate, so her lead will remain the same or get better. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #8
that's your biased opinion RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #9
Pssssst! Obama is not running. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #10
I know that. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #11
If you are good with President Obama then I would think you would be a Hillary supporter. DCBob Apr 2016 #15
Yeah. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #17
I can be good or okay with Obama and know that we still morningfog Apr 2016 #36
+10 appalachiablue Apr 2016 #47
I think the debate probably helped Hillary if anything... DCBob Apr 2016 #13
Listen to the end of the debate again RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #18
Winning a debate is not just about scoring points with simplistic one-liners. DCBob Apr 2016 #19
Yeah, she mentioned Obama so much RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #20
I fear for this country and the world if the Republicans take over. DCBob Apr 2016 #21
Keep the White House RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #25
I think we will do fine down ticket. DCBob Apr 2016 #29
Ahhh . . . he has contributed very little to down-ticket dems, unlike Clinton who has done that . . brush Apr 2016 #53
Thank You RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #57
Bribes to help another dem get elected? Ok, guess that's how people who just joined . . . brush Apr 2016 #85
Come on, Sanders brought nothing new to the table. The same thing he has said in the previous eight lunamagica Apr 2016 #22
The thing is RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #24
It doesn't resonate enough. His supporters are a noisy lot, but he is behind by millions of votes lunamagica Apr 2016 #32
Not enough!!! George II Apr 2016 #33
Nice copy and paste job. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #34
I don't see anything wrong with copying and pasting the good work she has done lunamagica Apr 2016 #40
lunamagica, HRC is not who you think she is angrychair Apr 2016 #44
Kick & Rec This Post. Important to know who we're dealing with, for decades. appalachiablue Apr 2016 #48
Our system of justice depends on criminal attorneys giving a vigorous defense pnwmom Apr 2016 #64
Got it angrychair Apr 2016 #70
She wasn't ridiculing anyone. She was reporting the defendant's claims and representing him. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #74
No, she was doing what I said she was doing angrychair Apr 2016 #78
The affidavit says, "I have been informed . . . " That shows those are not her words. pnwmom Apr 2016 #80
That is splitting hairs and you know it angrychair Apr 2016 #83
No, it is the essence of our justice system. Defense attorneys represent their clients. pnwmom Apr 2016 #84
you know who else hated defense lawyers dsc Apr 2016 #77
That is such a dirty, low-blow, that not even the Sanders campaign has brought it up lunamagica Apr 2016 #67
Nothing angrychair Apr 2016 #72
You didn't read the post, or the links, didn't you? lunamagica Apr 2016 #82
+1000. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #75
what really happened DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #68
Yes. And our whole system of justice depends on having good defense lawyers pnwmom Apr 2016 #76
Gross angrychair Apr 2016 #79
Clinton did not say any of those things "in her own words." She was representing her client's pnwmom Apr 2016 #81
Thank you! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #41
Emerson's post debate poll puts her up +15. pnwmom Apr 2016 #56
The Emerson 55-40 poll is all Post-Debate!!! DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #63
It's a given that she's going to win NY. Beacool Apr 2016 #23
If she wins, I think it will be by single digits. morningfog Apr 2016 #37
I KNOW that she will win by negative points. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #49
She'll win in real life. Beacool Apr 2016 #51
Do you have RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #52
Cmon Tuesday! workinclasszero Apr 2016 #26
Excellent news! SharonClark Apr 2016 #28
It's in the last 3 day when the shift takes place n/t Blue Meany Apr 2016 #30
What shift? eom MoonRiver Apr 2016 #31
The unicorn sparklepony shift CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #38
As the saying goes, hope springs eternal..... Beacool Apr 2016 #39
Oh, thaaat shift! MoonRiver Apr 2016 #42
Hehe.. DCBob Apr 2016 #43
Updated intel reports, 1988. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #45
Bizarre analogy. DCBob Apr 2016 #50
Moderately funny joke though. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #54
Moderately funny.. I will give you that. DCBob Apr 2016 #55
So was Michigan n/t RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #58
Michigan was an open primary.. NY is not. DCBob Apr 2016 #59
Thanks for the meme RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #60
Those are facts. DCBob Apr 2016 #65

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
69. Well ... I'll only "try". But I didn't say how much effort I'll put into trying.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
Apr 2016

Oh, fuckit ... never mind... who am I kidding? I changed my mind! I'm gonna gloat like it's 1999.



Note to Jury: The above statements represent my opinion. No DU rules or terms of service have been violated. It is not against the rules to have an opinion that differs from the Alerter. --- REMINDER: Jury Duty is not intended to be a weapon to silence opponents. It's a community standards tool to enforce the terms of service. Use your best and honest judgement when deciding if this post violates the actual DU rules.







One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
5. And the polls had Bernie losing in Michgan too.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:40 AM
Apr 2016

I live in NYC and all the Dems I know are voting for Bernie.

LiberalFighter

(51,027 posts)
6. That will push Clinton up by about 30 to 40 delegates
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:44 AM
Apr 2016

Delegate split about 140 - 107. (Low estimate)

Clinton from 1309 to 1449
Sanders from 1095 to 1202

Spread from 214 to 247

Delegates Remaining: 1400

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
12. And then next Tuesday its gets even worse for Mr Sanders.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:08 PM
Apr 2016

MD and PA are going to go big for Hillary as well.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
7. Almot none of it is post debate. Odd
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:50 AM
Apr 2016

The CBS poll covered 3 days, with only the last being collected post debate. It also has the closest spread at 10 points. None of the other polls collected any data since the debate.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
9. that's your biased opinion
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:03 PM
Apr 2016

In my opinion, Obama won the debate. Hillary convinced me to vote for him!

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
11. I know that.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:06 PM
Apr 2016

But Hillary was mentioning him and praising him so much, that I would rather vote for Obama than Clinton!

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
15. If you are good with President Obama then I would think you would be a Hillary supporter.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:33 PM
Apr 2016

Policy wise they are much closer.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
17. Yeah.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:12 PM
Apr 2016

One was "Yes we can," but didn't, the other is "No we can't," and doesn't do it, but talks a good game!

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
18. Listen to the end of the debate again
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:13 PM
Apr 2016

then tell me again that Clinton won. Only in a Bizzaro World did she win.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
19. Winning a debate is not just about scoring points with simplistic one-liners.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary won by being the adult in the room with logical arguments and specifics on proposals. That might be boring to some but to most voters that is what we want.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
20. Yeah, she mentioned Obama so much
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:22 PM
Apr 2016

I thought that she was campaigning for him!
She's all talk, no action.
I guess you want more wars. I guess you want social security to be privatized. I guess you don't want a living minimum wage.
If that's what you want, you certainly deserve it. I only hope that none of your kids are in the military, or you are nearing retirement age, or you don't have to look for a job any time soon.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
21. I fear for this country and the world if the Republicans take over.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:23 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary is our best bet to keep the White House. Its as simple as that.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
25. Keep the White House
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

but lose the House and Senate. We need both!
Bernie brings others, like it or not.
There ARE RepubliCONs and Independents who will vote for Bernie, and the races down ticket.
No RepubliCON nor any Independent will vote for Clinton.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
29. I think we will do fine down ticket.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:38 PM
Apr 2016

There are analysts who think we win back the Senate. That would be huge.

brush

(53,828 posts)
53. Ahhh . . . he has contributed very little to down-ticket dems, unlike Clinton who has done that . .
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:45 AM
Apr 2016

continuously. Which is ironic as Sanders should be most aware that he can't get his agenda passed without a dem congress.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
57. Thank You
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:51 PM
Apr 2016

That's the meme coming from Camp Clinton. I know that you are all programmed to say that.
Thank You for the obvious.

We shall see if she continues her "contributions" (I like to call them bribes, because that's what they actually are) when she has lost the primary.

brush

(53,828 posts)
85. Bribes to help another dem get elected? Ok, guess that's how people who just joined . . .
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:33 PM
Apr 2016

the party look at it and don't seem to understand getting the White House without Congresspeople and Senators will get you no effing where.

Democrats know this, independents just turned Dems seem to be not up to speed yet on such an all important matter so they call help to other dems bribes.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
22. Come on, Sanders brought nothing new to the table. The same thing he has said in the previous eight
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 04:51 PM - Edit history (1)

debates, which is a repetition of his usual speech.

His opening was just pathetic. The same, old tired opening which didn't have a single word pertaining to NY.

When he was asked to provide an example how Hillary's had been influenced by Wall Street in her Senate career, he couldn't give one.

Eight debates haven't helped him so far...why would this one be different, when nothing new was presented?

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
24. The thing is
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:18 PM
Apr 2016

is that the "same thing" resonates. People listen to that same thing that Bernie has been saying for quite a long time, and know it's true, and must be changed.
Clinton says a lot, but she does nothing for the middle and working classes. She only does what is correct for the upper crust.
I do not want a president that does not have any concern for us. I am not one of the 1%, as she is, and shall not vote for her.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
32. It doesn't resonate enough. His supporters are a noisy lot, but he is behind by millions of votes
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 03:21 PM
Apr 2016

and hundreds of delegates. Obviously most voters don't agree with your assessment of Clinton. That's because they are right wing smears.

Here are some of her work helping middle and working classes

•created Arkansas's Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth
•led a task force that reformed Arkansas's education system
•Instrumental in passage of the State Children's Health Insurance Program
•Promoted nationwide immunization against childhood illnesses
•Successfully sought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health
•Worked to investigate reports of an illness that affected veterans of the Gulf War (now recognized as Gulf War Syndrome)
•Helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice
•Initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act
•Helped create Vital Voices, an international initiative to promote the participation of women in the political processes of their countries.
•Served on five Senate committees:
-Committee on Budget (2001–2002)
-Committee on Armed Services (2003–2009)
-Committee on Environment and Public Works (2001–2009)
-Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (2001–2009)
-Special Committee on Aging.
•Member of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe
•Instrumental in securing $21 billion in funding for the World Trade Center site's redevelopment
•Leading role in investigating the health issues faced by 9/11 first responders.

And there is more. Does this sound to you like someone who does nothing for middle and working classes?

Sanders has had a decades long career with very little to show for it. He is all talk, and I quote you here "for quite a long time".

Hillary has worked hard, starting at a very young age. I can't imagine the reaction here if she had never had a real job until she was 40!

At the age where Sander was pretty much a drifter, Hillary had already done so much work helping the middle and working classes, esp women and children. That's what we need in the WH



 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
34. Nice copy and paste job.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 05:45 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders was a drifter, oh well. As far as I'm concerned, that's better than a corporate grifter, and a Goldwater Girl, which was Clinton's way.

I'm not buying your copy and paste propaganda from the campaign.

What about the war that killed thousands of Americans?

Can you explain, in your own words, how this helped the middle and working class without copying and pasting?

It's one thing to copy and paste a person's accomplishments, it's another thing to actually understand them.

The votes that Bernie is behind by correlate to the fact that there are many many fewer voters in caucuses than there are in primaries. This is a bogus "fact." It has very little to do with the nomination. He is only behind by about 220 committed delegates. Superdelegates can waver with the wind.

You keep copying and pasting.
Perhaps someone will believe you.
Oh and don't bother to respond, I put you on ignore.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
40. I don't see anything wrong with copying and pasting the good work she has done
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 07:09 PM
Apr 2016

What is your problem? do you believe that what I posted were lies?

And come on, the stuff is self explanatory. For example "Helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice" Don't you see how that helped women?

"Initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act" Do you really need explanation for this?
Same with the rest of them.

You know that Hillary has surpassed Obama in PDs?

I'm not replying for your benefit. Go on, hide from the truth.

angrychair

(8,732 posts)
44. lunamagica, HRC is not who you think she is
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:32 AM
Apr 2016

The person that 'created' the "office on violence against women" told a 12-year of girl she wanted to be raped.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/clintons-delegate-lead-do_b_9711160.html

Clinton's own words:
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

What happened to that little girl:
"In her interview with The Daily Beast, she recounted the details of her attack in 1975 at age 12 and the consequences it had for both her childhood and adult life. A virgin before the assault, she spent five days afterwards in a coma, months recovering from the beating that accompanied the rape, and over 10 years in therapy. The doctors told her she would probably never be able to have children."

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
64. Our system of justice depends on criminal attorneys giving a vigorous defense
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:01 PM
Apr 2016

to their clients.

Hillary didn't ask for that case. To the contrary, she asked how she could get out of it, when it was assigned to her by a judge. The answer was that she couldn't. Once she had the case, it was her job to listen to her client and represent him. She is not reporting her own views in the affidavit. She was a 27 year old lawyer in a small town who was acting as a court appointed attorney by someone who could not afford a lawyer.

angrychair

(8,732 posts)
70. Got it
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:13 PM
Apr 2016

HRC supporters have no issues with her ridiculing a 12 year child saying she deserved to be beaten and raped and made infertile as she was "fantasizing" about older men and "an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

If this had been Sanders, the world would be on fire right now about this.

angrychair

(8,732 posts)
78. No, she was doing what I said she was doing
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:59 PM
Apr 2016

Those were HRC's words, not her client's words. The accused didn't even know here.


Here is what I find stunning:
Police officers get found "not guilty" in a court of law of killing young black men and it's wrong, miscarriages of justice and dozens of OPs are made to attacking the courts, defense, prosecutor and so on.


Clinton, in her own words, says that a 12-year old child, who was a virgin at the time of the attack, that was beaten, raped and made infertile by an attack from her client, deserved it because of "fantasies" about older men and being impetuous though she was still recovering from the attack at the time.

This "blame the victim" rape culture, even as a legal defense, is disgusting and defending it, while attacking the legal that does directly involve your candidate, is just as disgusting and embarrassing.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
80. The affidavit says, "I have been informed . . . " That shows those are not her words.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

She is representing her client with this statement.

Clinton did not say this child deserved what happened to her.

But it is NOT the job of a defense attorney to assist the prosecution in convicting a defendant; it is the job of a defense attorney to provide a vigorous defense.

angrychair

(8,732 posts)
83. That is splitting hairs and you know it
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:12 PM
Apr 2016

the defense of a client DOES NOT have to include the "blame the victim" slut-shaming. This is no different than the "what were you wearing at the time of the attack" or "were you wearing makeup".
It was unquestionably true she was beaten and raped and dropping the statement about a 12-year old child having sexual fantasies involving older men being related to why she was attacked is disgusting and vile.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
84. No, it is the essence of our justice system. Defense attorneys represent their clients.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

It's their job.

Then it's the job of the jury or a judge to decide on the outcome.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
77. you know who else hated defense lawyers
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:53 PM
Apr 2016

Hitler and Stalin and every dictator who has ever walked the earth.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
67. That is such a dirty, low-blow, that not even the Sanders campaign has brought it up
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:30 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary was a public defender. She was assigned the case. She requested to be removed from it, but the request was denied, so, she did her job. That is how the system works.

Even the prosecutor in the case defended Hillary over this:

The prosecutor in the case, Mahlon Gibson, defended Clinton in an interview with CNN last month, calling questions over her role “ridiculous.”

“If you are appointed by the court, you damn better do everything you can do to defend them,” Gibson said.

Here are some links so you can educate yourself:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/04

/hillary_clinton_defended_an_alleged_rapists_feminist_lawyers_are_right_to.html

http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clinton-speaks-about-defense-of-child-rapist/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/07/hillary-clinton-rape-case_n_5564770.html

angrychair

(8,732 posts)
72. Nothing
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:25 PM
Apr 2016

Nothing will make the blaming of a child for being raped and beaten "ok".
This "blame the victim" rape culture is bullshit and that HRC supporters have really been drinking the koolaid to be able to go along with this.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
82. You didn't read the post, or the links, didn't you?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:08 PM
Apr 2016

I don't follow you. but I bet you have a number of posts screaming about mass incarceration.

With the hatred I've seen towards defense attorneys here, it's pure hypocrisy to rant about mass incarceration.

Both defense attorneys and prosecutors must do their jobs the fullest extent of the law.

According to press accounts, the case fell apart because of a combination of factors: contradictory statements by the complainant, prosecutorial incompetence, and “aggressive” defense advocacy. But it is wrong to call Clinton’s thorough investigation of the case, including sending evidence to a forensics expert, overly aggressive. Likewise, developing a viable defense theory—that a troubled child might not be a credible witness—is not at all improper. Clinton was right to pursue her client’s interest no matter the charge or her own misgivings. She understood that she could not be both lawyer and judge.


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/04/hillary_clinton_defended_an_alleged_rapists_feminist_lawyers_are_right_to.html

You totally ignored my reply. You are going on pure emotion and hatred of Clinton, without an ounce of reasoning.

But please, answer this...why hasn't Sanders brought this up?

DemonGoddess

(4,640 posts)
68. what really happened
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:31 PM
Apr 2016
Because of her exemplary pretrial advocacy, the case did not go to trial and Clinton did not have to face the alleged victim. This was probably a good thing for her client, as Clinton seems to have felt ambivalent about the case. She said in an interview that she initially resisted the appointment, and she made a sardonic reference to the accuracy of polygraph tests—because her client managed to pass one.


But Clinton should not have to apologize for her defense of her client, or for feeling proud of the outcome: a plea to a lesser charge and short jail sentence. She is being taken to task for “laughing” about the case in an interview from the 1980s, when she was first lady of Arkansas. But nowhere in that interview does she laugh at the alleged victim. She laughs when she describes her client’s polygraph results and prosecutors bungling the case by destroying evidence. This is familiar criminal defense gallows humor.


[link:http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/04/hillary_clinton_defended_an_alleged_rapists_feminist_lawyers_are_right_to.html|

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
76. Yes. And our whole system of justice depends on having good defense lawyers
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:48 PM
Apr 2016

to represent clients who are facing all the power of the state.

angrychair

(8,732 posts)
79. Gross
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:03 PM
Apr 2016

Here is what I find stunning:
Police officers get found "not guilty" in a court of law of killing young black men and it's wrong, miscarriages of justice and dozens of OPs are made to attacking the courts, defense, prosecutor and so on.


Clinton, in her own words, says that a 12-year old child, who was a virgin at the time of the attack, that was beaten, raped and made infertile by an attack from her client, deserved it because of "fantasies" about older men and being impetuous though she was still recovering from the attack at the time.

This "blame the victim" rape culture, even as a legal defense, is disgusting and defending it, while attacking the legal that does directly involve your candidate, is just as disgusting and embarrassing.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
81. Clinton did not say any of those things "in her own words." She was representing her client's
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

claims when she wrote the affidavit. And that was her job as the court-assigned defense attorney.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
49. I KNOW that she will win by negative points.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:41 AM
Apr 2016

You might call it a win, in the land of Clintonistas, but I shall call it a win for Bernie.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
52. Do you have
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:29 AM
Apr 2016

any more of what you are imbibing in? I sure could use an occasional break from reality!

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
45. Updated intel reports, 1988.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:33 AM
Apr 2016

The threat from the Soviet state has been remarkably stable over past 10 years.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
54. Moderately funny joke though.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:16 PM
Apr 2016

If you keep employing the same flawed model, you will keep getting the same mistaken results.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
60. Thanks for the meme
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:55 PM
Apr 2016

from Camp Clinton. I know that is what they have programmed you folks to say, and you are obeying just like good little brown shirts.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Updated 4/18: New York po...