2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumConcerned that Indiana incident has not changed polls by at least 3 points
Let us see what happens in Gallup and the rest shortly. This is disconcerting.
LA Times had a heading that said Iowa is slipping away. Hope not..
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)distraction for Romney, but he's not on the national ballot.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)besides the Mourdock thing is too recent to have any real impact as yet--does that 'concern' you, too?
joycejnr
(326 posts)...it may prompt Obama supporters to vote, when earlier polls showing big leads may have made many too comfortable.
The polls are meaningless until the Friday before Election Day, anyway. Our fears should be focused on vote suppression, voter intimidation, and those damned voting machines.
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)"LA Times had a heading that said Iowa is slipping away" from Robme if anything....
kansasobama
(609 posts)Thank you guys. I (as you all are) just should keep at it...
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)be gone.
PsychProfessor
(204 posts)The thing just happened. Also, don't some of the tracking polls involve rolling averages? Things show up a few days down the line, as a result. I think Iowa should be safe. Plus, did you see that Ryan is campaigning in Georgia today? Why on earth would they send him to Georgia??
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)Where are they?
hoboken123
(251 posts)And doesn't Obama look tired? I hope everything's ok.
/sarcasm
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Actually, I don't think this incident itself will move polls. It is simply another Repub blunder with moderate women who are undecided. This may switch a few undecideds to Obama.
You do realize that moving 3 points on a national poll is hard to do?
krawhitham
(4,644 posts)The trackers are 3-7 days rolling average, the 1st day of impact will be tomorrow with the 3 day trackers showing 1/3 of the impact
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)And it will be really difficult to attribute to this in any event, as the numbers are already moving in Obama's direction.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Sugarcoated
(7,724 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)you mention?
TroyD
(4,551 posts)Except perhaps in Indiana, and even there it's hard to say because it's a conservative state.
We have to remember that the vast majority of Romney/Mourdock supporters will continue to vote Republican regardless.
I did post today's endorsement by the Courier-Journal of Donnelly over Mourdock this morning, so we'll see whether Donnelly can now pull out a narrow win over Mourdock.
No new polling out of Indiana yet, so I expect it will be a few days before we know.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)Do you REALLY expect this to change polls in that amount of time?
Concern noted.
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)There are several ways it can impact.
Voters decide to vote for Donnelly instead of nutcracker
Voters decide not to vote between the two
Either way it benefits Donnelly. How much we don't know yet.
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)I hear fishing is much better over at Freeperville
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)There really is little reason for concern. The Indiana business is not likely to have much effect anyway - certainly not 3 points. There may be some slight movement in battleground state polls based on it, particularly Ohio, but not likely in the national polls.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Yes, indeed.