2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat bothered me most was the smirk.
Whenever she pulled one of her pre-planted smears (ex NYDN interview interpretations) she would smirk in a way that I've only seen one other pol do - yes, that's the Smirking Chimp himself.
I didn't like him, his policies, nor his dishonest method of governing. I think a Hillary administration would be at least as bad and for exactly the same reasons. Dishonest, bad judgement, and violently churning the people of the world to keep the economic cream on the top.
Bernie 2016 - please.
Awknid
(381 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)Smugness personified.
Even while it was her turn, she'd stare at him then adopt that smirky smile and scan the audience with a gaze of superiority.
It's like the worst kind of behavior found in a suburban high school cafeteria.
He's the real deal, she's the empty hearted know-it-all.
Yuck!
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)People who call Bernie angry must not be paying any attention to her. Her internal polling must be awful.
senz
(11,945 posts)She has become quite tense, lately. Feels like 2008 all over again.
Bernie only smiles/laughs when he's pleased or amused -- which SO natural and non-politician of him.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)Though I didn't see him smirking.
senz
(11,945 posts)I think it was an "oh no here we go again" laugh.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)she was doing the same thing, and I'm a Bernie supporter.
senz
(11,945 posts)the same way rude people do in group conversations -- roll their eyes, smirk with the others while someone they don't like is talking.
Bernie wasn't playing that game; he would just look down and laugh to himself. He was reacting to the content of what she said, not to her as a person.
Her smirks and laughter were purposeful assaults; his was pure reaction. There is a big difference.
whathehell
(29,090 posts)but you're right, in that Hillary's smirks did seem nasty and I didn't see Bernie doing that.
senz
(11,945 posts)whathehell
(29,090 posts)xloadiex
(628 posts)[img][/img]
Lars39
(26,116 posts)I feel bad for him having to have first hand exposure to that anger.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I am sure that millions of Americans can identify with his feeling at that moment. I feel so sorry for Bill and Chelsea.
trueblue2007
(17,238 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)I see no contempt towards women from this true progressive, Bernie Sanders. I see nothing but contempt for the electorate from Hillary Clinton. Strange how we can see these candidates so differently.
senz
(11,945 posts)He is a moral human being and moral human beings find corrupt and unethical individuals contemptible.
Bernie is one of the most nonsexist people on the planet.
hopeforchange2008
(610 posts)Choose any topic and she figure out a way to make her an 'artful smear'. It is nauseating. We're lucky he just looked at her that way. I've have vomited.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)And it's fucking bullshit to say Bernie does not respect women. Go sell that lie somewhere else.
.99center
(1,237 posts)One question from a progressive activist.
11 hours of being questioned by republicans.
Were all aware that she go's for the throat when going after progressives, where's that same passion towards republicans?
djean111
(14,255 posts)I imagine this will get alerted on by the flying monkeys, though - "You compared Hillary to Shrub!!!!!!! How can a Democrat do that!!!!!!" The answer is deeds, not words, but all they go by is whatever words they are issued for the day.
Nyan
(1,192 posts)I don't think she smirked because she felt superior per se, but merely because she was trying to assert superiority.
It's a facade -you wanna project confidence, but you're not all that confident in reality. Especially in these contexts such as debate, people tend to smirk when they feel like they're not in the position of strength. Mitt Romney smirked a lot in the debate against Obama.
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)There is a reason her 'unlikeable' numbers are so high.
It is not just because of her flip-flopping and her checkered scandalous past ... it is because she always has been conceited.
Her personality exudes a sense of privilege, an aura that she really deserves to be treated as political royalty.
The vote for president is a very personal one that for most people goes beyond just issues -- we have to live with this person for four years, they come into our homes on TV, in the news, in discussions, etc.
Sometimes we elect people who have prickly personalities as president, but we usually regret it.
Hillary is more Richard Nixon, in my opinion, than Shrub (partly because G. W. Bush actually lost, but the SCOTUS made sure he got in anyway -- so we weren't fooled, we were gamed).
Sen. Sanders is polling very well on the how people like him -- he will win against Cruz or Trump.
Clinton will lose against even Cruz or Trump because she is a known unlikeable candidate -- she starts with a huge deficit since even now a lot of people just don't know that much about Cruz or Trump -- but they already know they don't like Hillary.
The Hillary Smirk has certainly become more obvious as her irritation at not being proclaimed 'Queen of the Party' by now.
Heaven help the United States it Mrs. Clinton is ever president. indeed: Bernie 2016 - please.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)if they get the presidency; assuming I'm not medical's out by then. I don't intend on staying here and supporting her.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Fairgo
(1,571 posts)I love a good "aristocrats" joke
Joob
(1,065 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)But when Bernie hit her upside the head on the big money issues perhaps 10 minutes in, she got visibly angry and the cackling strategy went out the window. Then when it got to her propensity to favor regime change in the second hour, she went into Colonel Jessup mode, telling us that we need her on that wall.
As Mike Tyson said: "Everybody has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth."
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Spot on analysis.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)On TYT so I only had the audio but I could hear her smugness when she delivered her prescripted 'zingers' it was unbearable.
kimbutgar
(21,192 posts)apnu
(8,758 posts)Nasty debate brawling. Die hard Bernie and Hillary people wanted a mud fest. And today everybody is declaring themselves the winner. This debate was pointless and changed nothing. Most debates are. In today's hyper-connected world, debates do not swing undecideds much. Its just a part of the "infotainment" circus.
LexVegas
(6,095 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Maybe you should send it to bed without any supper.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)watching both sides fight each other in GD-P is pretty entertaining though
Interesting enough, "The Purge- Election Year" comes out on July 1st. One way or another I see a purge coming at DU around that time frame. Just waiting to see which side takes the hits LOL-
senz
(11,945 posts)Okay, but please don't ever run for office.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)It will be pretty entertaining to be sure...
Orsino
(37,428 posts)I avoid watching speeches, and tend to discount debate performances. I try to, anyway, perhaps because I think I can be swayed unduly.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Body language and other non verbal behaviors are a critical part of communication to me.
randome
(34,845 posts)Clinton does not come across as entirely comfortable when giving speeches to large crowds. Big deal.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
Impedimentus
(898 posts)Maybe he'll paint a portrait of her?
FEEL THE BERN - 2106
Tarc
(10,476 posts)What we witnessed last night was essentially a 2-hour mansplain.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)Raincoats are only made and sold to women. How 'bout you run along and find a real fire to douse? Let's hope other Hill fans are not as overly sensitive as you are.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Raincoat.
senz
(11,945 posts)She is verbally aggressive and domineering.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and her support for the crime bill, and her support for Israel's excessive responses, and her support for regime change and no fly zones, and just everything about her.
hopeforchange2008
(610 posts)She held forth with desperation.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)The word does not mean what you think it means, apparently.
hopeforchange2008
(610 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Sanders fans just don't like hearing the word "no", it seems.
hopeforchange2008
(610 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)hopeforchange2008
(610 posts)their ill-founded sense of superiority.
Her negatives aren't high nationwide because she's highly regarded.
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)time Hillary talks. He's awful.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)... she talks talks too much, she's not humble enough, she brought up women's rights in the debate, etc. There were a lot of complaints like that in the debate threads yesterday. Hillary really needs to be more ladylike. But, Bernie with his shouting and fierce body language (incessantly pointing), well that's okay because he's a guy and guys are cool no matter what.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)She's just awful in general. Literally the only reason I can think of to vote for her is that she isn't Donald Trump or Ted Cruz. That's it. Dreadful.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)There are many reasons not to support Hillary, but when one talks about her smirk, cackle, etc. it's just sexist bs.
senz
(11,945 posts)and she lets people know where she stands with tremendous passion and enthusiasm.
But tell me: do you consider all the jokes about Dubya's smirk to be sexist?
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)... As far as Bush goes, no, the smirk is not sexist. Sexism, like racism and homophobia, is based on power. The powerful stereotype minorities and women. White straight men rarely lose power when they are defined negatively. If one called Bush a corporate whore, it's a lot different than using that expression on a woman. If one calls Bush a cracker, it's a lot different than calling a black man a n-. If one talks about Bush's smirk or a man's cackle, it's a lot different than using those expressions for a woman. Judge Hillary by her policies and her records, nothing else.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)eom
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)LisaM
(27,830 posts)I guess we all see what we want to see.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)PufPuf23
(8,839 posts)I am going to be angry and hold a grudge if forced to vote for Hillary Clinton.
I am a registered and voting Democratic Party member of nearly 45 years.
I was a career Federal employee (USDA) and earlier graduated a California high school and registered for the Vietnam draft when Nixon was POTUS.
LyndaG
(683 posts)Sorry, you lost me. She's pro-choice, pro ACA.
You may not like her, and you may feel your candidate is better, but saying she is no better than B/C ? Can't agree. People would lose rights if a Republican President is elected.
senz
(11,945 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)That may have hurt her. Fox Poll today shows HRC 46 to Bernie 44. But I always take polls with a grain of salt.
2banon
(7,321 posts)matt819
(10,749 posts)It is her default. And it is obnoxious.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Hillary's speeches were nothing but complimentary toward the bankers. No one shells out a quarter of a million dollars to be called on the carpet and criticized.
I liken those speeches to a popular entertainer agreeing to perform at a private party hosted by a millionaire. The entertainer is paid big bucks to make the host and guests happy by playing exactly what they want snd expect to hear. No way is he going to insult the guy who's signing the check.
If the speeches weren't potentially embarrassing or politically harmful, she'd have released the transcripts by now.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)His finger for for four years. He can't even remember how he planned to break up the big banks. An embarrasment. Definitely not ready for prime time
Response to kristopher (Original post)
MFM008 This message was self-deleted by its author.