Just over half an hour until Bernie gives his
talk at the Vatican conference. It's scheduled for 4 PM Rome time. I wonder if it will be live-streamed. I hope his flight went well and he arrived rested.
= new reply since forum marked as read
...on my ignore list.
...I knew that already.
But thanks for the tutorial... 
This one put me, and others, on ignore last night. The funny part is that I don't even know this poster.
.... you lock the door.🙈
We got the snide aspects of your post. We also noted the empty content.
I wanted to add, I really want to see it too. I want to see him in his element and what ideas he might share on how to combat poverty world wide. Even if he's simply standing up to support another's ideas it's something that I really would like to see. (I actually want to see the entire set of speakers - but would settle for just Bernie)
What I posted are facts that anyone can check and see for themselves. That's why I use links and name sources so much. It makes it easy to see where I got my information. It also makes it easy to correct if wrong.
So, where's the mistake? PNAC?
Ms. Clinton kept Ms. Nuland gainfully employed at State. As our woman in Ukraine, Victoria Nuland, is married to PNAC co-founder Robert Kagan
Robert Kagan's brother is Frederick Kagan
Frederick Kagan's spouse is Kimberly Kagan
Brilliant people, big ideas, etc. The thing is, that's a lot of PNAC. And the PNAC approach to international relations means more wars without end for profits without cease, among other things detrimental to democracy, peace and justice.
Neocon Kagan Endorses Hillary Clinton
Exclusive: Hillary Clinton’s cozy ties to Washington’s powerful neocons have paid off with the endorsement of Robert Kagan, one of the most influential neocons. But it also should raise questions among Democrats about what kind of foreign policy a President Hillary Clinton would pursue, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
ConsortiumNews, February 25, 2016
Prominent neocon Robert Kagan has endorsed Democrat Hillary Clinton for president, saying she represents the best hope for saving the United States from populist billionaire Donald Trump, who has repudiated the neoconservative cause of U.S. military interventions in line with Israel’s interests.
In a Washington Post op-ed published on Thursday, Kagan excoriated the Republican Party for creating the conditions for Trump’s rise and then asked, “So what to do now? The Republicans’ creation will soon be let loose on the land, leaving to others the job the party failed to carry out.”
Then referring to himself, he added, “For this former Republican, and perhaps for others, the only choice will be to vote for Hillary Clinton. The [Republican] party cannot be saved, but the country still can be.”
While many of Kagan’s observations about the Republican tolerance and even encouragement of bigotry are correct, the fact that a leading neocon, a co-founder of the infamous Project for the New American Century, has endorsed Clinton raises questions for Democrats who have so far given the former New York senator and Secretary of State mostly a pass on her pro-interventionist policies.
The fact is that Clinton has generally marched in lock step with the neocons as they have implemented an aggressive “regime change” strategy against governments and political movements that don’t toe Washington’s line or that deviate from Israel’s goals in the Middle East. So she has backed coups, such as in Honduras (2009) and Ukraine (2014); invasions, such as Iraq (2003) and Libya (2011); and subversions such as Syria (from 2011 to the present) all with various degrees of disastrous results.
CONTINUED...
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/02/25/neocon-kagan-endorses-hillary-clinton/
So, feel free to show where I'm wrong. I'll be happy to apologize and correct the error.
