About Hillary's 2.4 million lead....

[Lone_Wolf]

A con artist can usually hit a few marks in a town before people get wise to it.

I'd bet a significant portion of that 2.4 million now have buyer's remorse.

[metroins]

1. Nice smear

The people vote for their nominee by huge margins and Hillary will be that nominee.

Yet the smearing continues.

[JoePhilly]

2. So Bernie lost the debate ... is that your point?

OPs like this tell the story.

[seabeyond]

4. Point! Nt

[Dem2]

3. Voters are poopoo heads

How dare they not see the halo above my candidate of choice!

[Gothmog]

5. Sorry, Bernie Sanders. There is zero evidence of your ‘political revolution’ yet

Sanders platform requires a revolution that has not occurred It is my understanding that the reason why Sanders is proposing a number of programs that have no chance of passing is that his revolution will force the GOP in congress to be reasonable. The trouble is that there are no signs of this revolution. revolution https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/02/10/sorry-bernie-sanders-there-is-zero-evidence-of-your-political-revolution-yet/

Bernie Sanders recorded a resounding victory in New Hampshire's Democratic primary Tuesday. He crushed his rival, Hillary Clinton, with no less than 60 percent of the vote. If Sanders hopes not only to win the election but to achieve his ambitious progressive agenda, though, that might not be enough.

To succeed, Sanders might have to drive Americans who don't normally participate to the polls. Unfortunately for him, groups who usually do not vote did not turn out in unusually large numbers in New Hampshire, according to exit polling data.

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484

...As for Sanders, he credited his victory to turnout. "Because of a huge voter turnout -- and I say huge -- we won," he said in his speech declaring victory, dropping the "h" in "huge." "We harnessed the energy, and the excitement that the Democratic party will need to succeed in November."

In fact, Sanders won by persuading many habitual Democratic primary voters to support him. With 95 percent of precincts reporting their results as of Wednesday morning, just 241,000 ballots had been cast in the Democratic primary, fewer than the 268,000 projected by New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner last week. Nearly 289,000 voters cast ballots in the state's Democratic primary in 2008.

To be sure, the general election is still seven months away. Ordinary Americans might be paying little attention to the campaign at this point, and if Sanders wins the nomination, he'll have the help of the Democratic Party apparatus in registering new voters. The political revolution hasn't started, though, at least not yet.

Without this revolution, I am not sure how Sanders proposes to advance his unrealistic agenda.

I live in the real world and I simply do not believe that Sanders' agenda is realistic and the lack of any evidence of a Sanders revolution reinforces my opinion

Please vote for the candidate of your choice for any reason that you deem appropriate. Others are free to vote for the candidate of their choice based on the facts as they see them

[NCTraveler]

6. So last night didn't go well for you. Lol

Can't wait to vote for Clinton again.

[IamMab]

7. Ready in NJ!

Bring the primary our way; we'll introduce Bernie Sanders to the Pine Barrens.

[geek tragedy]

8. yes con artists get discovered, which is why Sanders will lose big in NY nt

[COLGATE4]

15. Oh. Ouch! You certainly

know how to make a deadly slam.

[brooklynite]

9. "Clinton voters: Too STUPID to make a smart choice". I'm Bernie Sanders and I approve this message

[ChisolmTrailDem]

12. On ignore you go. Thanks for making it so easy. Buh-bye. nt

[firebrand80]

10. Well, since "you'd bet" it's true

I guess that settles it

[pinebox]

11. This says it all

[LexVegas]

13. ....