2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary resorts to republican talking point in debate
Hillary Clinton resorted to
right-wing, republican talking
point to attack Bernie Sanders.
Specifically, she referenced her
"rock-ribbed, up-by-your-bootstraps,
conservative Republican" father.
Hillary has previously stated that her
"political beliefs are rooted in the conservative
beliefs she was raised with"
And now she fights AGAINST progressive
ideas such as "tuition-free" college...
based on her CONSERVATIVE principles
Hillary says we CANNOT afford
universal healthcare, or tuition-free college!
BUT, we can always afford WAR
and regime change, because apparently,
those things are free?
Broward
(1,976 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Geesh, if there's no money in it, there's no payoff.
Silly OP.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Congratulations, Class of 2015.
Youre the Most Indebted Ever
(For Now)
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015/05/08/congratulations-class-of-2015-youre-the-most-indebted-ever-for-now/
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)As John Oliver said in a 2014 piece and that graph confirms, student debt has more than tripled in the last 10 years. Incomes of new college graduates are probably flat at best overall, given how many college grads end up underemployed. So the percentage of income that must be devoted to student debt has gone way up, which limits the ability of young people to get married, start a family, buy a house, etc. Many of them are basically going to be debt slaves because student debt can't be erased even in bankruptcy.
John Oliver also pointed out that despite only having 13% of college student enrollment, 31% of student debt is associated with the corrupt "for profit college" industry, from which a very small percentage of students actually graduate and find suitable work in their field of study.
And it should be mentioned that Bill Clinton pocketed $16 million for 5 years of occasional public appearances on behalf of one of the sleazy for profit colleges, Laureate University. He went off the payroll there two weeks after Hillary announced she was running for President in 2016.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Mr. Clintons role as honorary chancellor for the college system, Laureate International Universities, was part of a five-year deal that began on April 24, 2010, an aide with his office said. The end of the agreement was first reported by Bloomberg Politics, and an aide to Mr. Clinton told Bloomberg that the separation had nothing to do with Mrs. Clintons campaign.
....
The university system part of Laureate Education Inc., which according to Bloomberg is the worlds largest for-profit college chain has been a seven-figure donor to the Clinton Foundation, giving between $1 million and $5 million, according to the foundations website. Laureate has also made five commitments through the Clinton Global Initiative.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/25/us/politics/bill-clinton-ends-role-with-laureate-chain-of-for-profit-colleges.html?_r=0
And yet, Bill expects us to believe
that his separation from Laureate
had NOTHING to do with Hillary's
run for office...
He must have become tired of
the cash flow and disinterested in
"the next generation of leaders"
jfern
(5,204 posts)and then you can easily afford it. Who needs free when you are born right?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...given her neoliberal economic platform and neoconservative foreign policy.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)are disenfranchised republicans.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I was rushed earlier, and the regular link isn't clickable, because of an @ symbol. It's from a write-up by Tony Brasunas that another friend had shared a while back.
https://goo.gl/gw0k9f
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Just look at all the people Obama appointed to his cabinet and judiciary, Goldman Sachs and Wall Street. That is MILES from liberal.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I was rushed earlier, and the regular link isn't clickable, because of an @ symbol. It's from a write-up by Tony Brasunas that another friend had shared a while back.
https://goo.gl/gw0k9f
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)I wish I had known when I was young what I know now.
For example, that my family's success (for lack of a better term, at least a lot of ownership of "things" was partially due to 90's racism and that a whole lot of people exalted the Clintons for simply considering them human. That mandatory minimums harm the very fabric of society. That I would thank my lucky stars for the opportunity to go to school and work both full time while the leaders of this country by and large got their education funded by Daddy, or barring that, a part part part time job. Wonder what she had to sacrifice for her "free college". Probably not half of what I am, and guess what, I am STILL TAKING OUT LOANS TO PAY FOR PART OF IT.
UGHS. Thanks for the rant.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Fact or Fiction?
To me, the odds seem high that Hillary's story is just that, an utter fabrication. In all likelihood, her family had enough income to afford Yale Law School in the early 1970s. At that time, the tuition was well in reach for an upper-middle-class family. (I know several of Hillary's law school classmates from similar backgrounds who accumulated no debt.)
But there's a bigger problem with Hillary's story: The loan forgiveness program she refers to didn't even exist in the early 1970s. Yale Law School literature is quite clear on this:
Established in 1989, the Career Options Assistance Program (COAP) was one of the first loan forgiveness programs of its kind."
1989 is not 1973. Yet doesn't this description sounds similar to the story Hillary tells?
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/hillarys-personal-story-about-student-loans-fabrication
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)I will admit I didn't research her personal story well as I had heard her conservative father paid from a casual source.
Thanks again, this time for the link! Very intriguing.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)We can't afford education...
but we can afford regime change?
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)there can be more than one 'progressive' solution to a problem? Just because she doesn't agree with a half-cocked plan to give free tuition to students that relies on Republicans becoming progressive stalwarts doesn't mean she's a turncoat.
That's the kind of purity the Tea Party expects. We're supposed to realize that there isn't always one answer.