2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Great Divide in the Democratic Primary
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-weisbrot/the-great-divide-in-the-d_b_9660146.htmlThe conventional wisdom is that younger voters are idealistic and impractical, and dont know enough about how the world works, and what can feasibly be accomplished in politics.
Leaving aside that younger in this case includes a majority of voters under 50 that support Sanders , there is an alternative explanation that makes more sense. There are times in almost any countrys history when important narratives lose credibility, and this expands the range of political possibilities. Younger people are often quicker to recognize these changes and the options that they present.
The Vietnam War is a classic example. Its legitimacy was premised on a deeply entrenched, Cold War narrative that the United States was engaged in an existential battle against communism, which threatened to take over the world. Vietnamese communists were part of this alleged existential threat, and therefore had to be defeated even at the cost of more than 58,000 American soldiers lives, millions of Vietnamese, and many more casualties, as well as hundreds of billions of dollars.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)over Sanders, he would have more delegates.
Of course the issues of us old folk are not important, we should not vote so the few younger people who do vote might have a chance at winning.
Meteor Man
(385 posts)Time to pull up the ladder!
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)And by the way, that number is highly questionable, but go ahead and keep touting it as if it were the definitive measure of your perceived accomplishment.
At the end of the day, your candidate is the wrong candidate to support for so many countless reasons, maybe you'll figure it out sooner or later, I just hope the rest of us doesn't have to suffer the consequences of the next Clinton Foundation White House.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)Joob
(1,065 posts)I don't think they like what they see. Nobody like's a shitshow. Nobody like's what Hillary's Campaign confirms. And we will remember how it played out. This party is going to fall hard because what does it stand for?
A nicer, more accepting version of republicans. Sellouts to corporations. They do things with a gentle hand but still act for their masters. Bad first impression being involved with democrats for the first time.
This party has the same chance to crumble as Hillary has for presidency.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)Hillary is more of the same. RepubliCON lite Dem. Unfortunately, a lot of older folks are very afraid of change.
2banon
(7,321 posts)I'm not talking about loose change either. keeps getting promised, but it never happens. we all know why.