2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie claims he's pro-union and anti-Uber. So why does he use Uber for 100% of his rides?
Last edited Tue Apr 12, 2016, 07:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Yup, hes got "serious problems" with Uber on his website, but in 2015 he was 100% for Uber when he or his staff needed a ride. By comparison, Hillary and her staff used it only 41% of the time.This is part of the serious disconnect both Bernie and many of his supporters have with regard to their socialist beliefs. A real socialist wouldnt be supporting Uber over unionized, regulated taxi drivers, and yet millions of young people and Bernie choose to save money that way.
I get why Ted Cruz would use Uber 97% of the time. Hes a tea party guy. But with all Bernies multimillions in campaign funds, he doesnt need to save money on the backs of taxi drivers.
However, this analysis only covers Bernies 2015 car ride expenses. So is he still such a heavy user of Uber?
When hes in NY, is he finally taking unionized taxi rides or is he continuing to prefer his Uber app?
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/which-candidates-most-money-uber-lodging/
Nov. 4, 2015
Share of each campaigns total taxi and ride-hailing app expenses paid to Uber:
Bernie Sanders: 100%
Ted Cruz: 97%
Donald Trump: 56%
Hillary Clinton: 41%
(Kasich wasnt included in the analysis)
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-08-06/bernie-sanders-takes-on-clinton-welfare-legacy-as-he-woos-iowa-unions
Sanders also said he has serious problems with the popular car-hailing company Uber. He called it unregulated."
Link on Bernies website:
https://berniesanders.com/uber-is-not-the-future-of-work/
Uber Is Not the Future of Work
NOVEMBER 18, 2015
| BY LAWRENCE MISHEL
The rise of Uber has convinced many pundits, economists, and policymakers that freelancing via digital platforms is becoming increasingly important to Americans livelihood. It has also promoted the idea that new technologyparticularly the explosion of platforms enabling the gig economywill fundamentally alter the future of work.
While Uber and other new companies in the gig economy receive a lot of attention, a look at Ubers own data about its drivers schedules and pay reveals them to be much less consequential than most people assume. In fact, dwelling on these companies too much distracts from the central features of work in America that should be prominent in the public discussion: a disappointingly low minimum wage, lax overtime rules, weak collective-bargaining rights, and excessive unemployment, to name a few. When it comes to the future of work, these are the aspects of the labor market that deserve the most attention.
SNIP
The most prominent legal and legislative questionone that has major implications for workers in industries as varied as construction and truckingis whether Uber drivers are being misclassified when Uber considers them independent contractors instead of actual employees. Independent contractors lack important protections, such as unemployment insurance and compensation for on-the-job injuries, that are granted to workers classified as employees. They also must pay both the employers and the employees portions of the Social-Security payroll tax. This classification also has implications for collective bargaining (as independent contractors are not covered by the legal framework enabling it) and for the overall collection of tax revenues (as the failure to report income is very common among independent
revbones
(3,660 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)None of the Top 10 Highest-Paid Bernie Sanders Staffers Are Women
A new report by Jezebel today looks at the gender and pay stats among the campaign staffs of our stunning primary candidates. The numbers aren't stellar in fact, they're even worse than we imagined. Who knew!
Bernie Sanders, he of socialist fame, comes out worst in Jezebel's report, especially considering his insistence that he is a candidate for the people (women included). Of the top ten highest-paid staffers on his payroll, none are women. To make up for it, we suppose, on average women make a little under $1,000 more than men. But they're still markedly missing from his campaign's highest earners. Men are really feeling the earn, I guess?
The investigation looked at year-end finance reports of the six active candidates in the race remaining Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich (lol). Every campaign except for Hillary Clinton's employees significantly more men than women (Clinton has 324 women and 202 men). Cruz is the candidate with the worst pay discrepancy: On average, his male employees make $20,000 more than female employees. The rest of the report, including a list of the names and salaries of the campaign staffers plus Jezebel's methodology, can be found here.
Really can't wait to see all those Bernie Bros sharing this important information regarding their favorite candidate on Facebook!!!
http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/03/bernie-sanders-wage-gap.html
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)More paid men too, for that matter.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They're a complete and total waste of cash if they don't bring home wins in states that have a substantial amount of delegates.
He's late to the party.
Clinton doesn't need a massive staff. That speaks to the strength of her ideas, that she doesn't have to say, hire 240 "paid staffers" and open "14 offices" .... in South Carolina, which is what Sanders did. And we saw how that ended up.
Throwing money at people and ads, and not getting much return on investment?
There's nothing "cool" about that. That's not a "better" candidate--that's a candidate that doesn't know how to spend money wisely.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)an hour.
All those interns in South Carolina likely laughed all the way to the bank.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)get Clinton elected. I don't need to be "bought." My time is a GIFT.
I think there's a lesson there, if people only decide to support a candidate if they get paid fifteen bucks an hour to do it, then their allegiance is only as strong as the next payday.
I think Bernie found that out when his 240 paid staff in SC delivered "shit" to him at the end of the campaign for that state. Talk about a complete and total waste of resources.
smh!
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)got "paid."
I'll tell ya--people who are used to getting paid don't work if there's no money coming in.
People who volunteer for the love of the cause? They don't have their hand out.
But bless YOUR heart for missing the point...
Armstead
(47,803 posts)"To make up for it, we suppose, on average women make a little under $1,000 more than men. "
It isn't just the upper echelons that matter.
And if you want to look at who had the power....Jane is the leader there,
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)This is a bizarre argument even for you.
RandySF
(58,899 posts)LexVegas
(6,067 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)Many of us want higher minimum wage but that doesn't mean we are going to stop buying from those who pay the current minimum.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)who is a union supporter -- at least those who can afford them.
And he can.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Not as easy to grab a ride when you need one right now. Sure if you are at an airport or in a busy downtown area, you might be able to find unused taxis waiting for a customer...but if you have to call for a ride, Uber might be more responsive.
In busy campaigns, when you are rushing from place to place, you will probably pick the fastest way to move. I don't know for sure, but maybe you could ask his campaign?
It is strange that he would never use a Taxi. I would think most politicians would use whatever is available at the time. Or maybe he has a problem with the condition taxi cars are in (smell, cleanliness or something) compared to passenger vehicles driven by normal people.
I think I've only ridden in a Taxi once and it wasn't a "nice" ride. It was kind of smelly. IF it is all that vehicle is used for, and it's used that way all day, five days a week or more, it might not be as nice as a regular use vehicle.
I hate Comcast, but I have to use it because of the Internet speeds. I'd prefer our cable industry be more like Europe's and I can work to change it, but, in the meantime, I have to use what I have.
Not a hard concept.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)while pretending to support unions.
That's deeply hyocritical.
... sounds just like the argument that you can take campaign money from someone without being bought and sold by them.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The rules don't apply to him!!!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)If you knew what a pout was.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)And neither is anyone else who uses Uber, though some people can't afford anything else. That doesn't apply to Bernie.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)is the only realistic choice.
But that couldn't be true 100% of the time.
Even Ted Cruz uses taxis 3% of the time.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Prism
(5,815 posts)Try the taxi experience in San Francisco sometime.
You'll very quickly learn why people prefer ride-sharing.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)when I might consider Uber, but I haven't found the need to do it yet.
And there's no excuse for a union-supporter with the financial means to take a taxi to be using Uber exclusingly.
Prism
(5,815 posts)I loathe the taxi industry here and make no bones about it.
Perhaps if they weren't a rigged, crony prone system, expensive, constantly rude to their riders, and were ever held accountable for the state of their cars, it'd be a different story.
That doesn't make me anti-union. It makes me someone with a problem with the local taxi industry.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)by his constant use of Uber.
Prism
(5,815 posts)You're using technology that was manufactured in developing nations, yeah?
Any true liberal would never condone indenturing children just so they can have luxury goods.
Right?
Tch. People make minor exceptions to their ideology in their everyday lives all the time.
If he supported a union-destroying free trade agreement, then you'd have my attention.
Ahem.
Oh, and I just want to note how funny it is you used this article, where Clinton stayed at the Ritz Carleton 9 times. Just, lol. Bernie economizes while Hillary lives like the entitled 1%.
Sounds exactly right, actually.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)is one of them.
I acknowledge there are times an Uber might be the best or even only choice.
But NOT 100% of the time.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Maybe that should take up more of your attention, since you claim you care deeply about this issue.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)And it was Robert Reich who pushed for NAFTA, against Hillary's wishes, because she wanted healthcare to be the Administration's priority.
Robert Reich bragged about winning that battle for influence in his book.
Prism
(5,815 posts)I'm sure President Hillary Clinton will be totally against free trade pacts that are terrible for the country rather suddenly and uncharacteristically.
I also enjoy epic poetry and the occasional novella when browsing fiction.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Don't drink that KoolAid
BTW, word is they will try to pass it during Lame Duck session. And Obama will sign it. If that happens Bernie's platform will run into innumerably more brick walls.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Clinton didn't do that when she sold arms to Saudi Arabia as SoS.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)discontinue business with Saudi Arabia.
Neither will it be Bernie's, if he's President.
lostnfound
(16,180 posts)And uber is perhaps environmentally friendly, due to a very efficient call system and due to the pooling option. No comparison. And a lot of uber drivers are also cab drivers who have told me they like being uber drivers better.
RandySF
(58,899 posts)Besides, another pedestrian was struck and killed by an Uber driver just today.
lostnfound
(16,180 posts)A woman in my town. I feel safer knowing the name and having a record and being able to track it through uber, especially if my teenager is riding in one alone. And I've had a yellow cab driver ask me a bunch of sexual questions: and two of them rip me off for an extra $40 on a $45 ride.
No, I've had LOTS of bad experiences with "regular" cabbies.
azmom
(5,208 posts)You never dissapoint.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)They clearly know little or nothing about licensed cab drivers.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)NYTWA is a membership based non-profit union fighting for the rights of NYC's 50,000+ taxi drivers.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Can't answer that?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)And other regulated taxi drivers all over the country are in unions.
In my area, Western WA, there's the WWACOA representing taxi drivers.
http://www.teamstertaxi.org/
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Who has the information if you don't know?
Do you just question every driver until you find one that is working under a union contract, or do you call a cab company and ask for a union driver, assuming that company has a collective bargaining agreement with a bona fide union.
In New York if you hail down a cab on a street do you ask the driver for evidence that he or she is a union member and request to see a copy of a collective bargaining agreement?
If the driver doesn't meet your conditions, you, move on until 5, 10 or 50 cabs later you find a union driver with a union contract. Is that how that works for you?
I take it you've never hailed down a cab in the big apple.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)I take it YOU'VE never hailed a cab in New York. Every driver of one of those yellow taxis is licensed and regulated, and his license is prominently displayed in his or her car.
You know what you're getting when you step in a real New York taxi.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Nanjeanne
(4,961 posts)Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Hillary used Uber for rides 41% of the time. She was at the bottom of the list. Cruz used Uber 97% of the time -- which makes sense because he's the tea party guy.
Response to pnwmom (Reply #43)
Name removed Message auto-removed
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)How does the wife of a former president with Secret Service protection and assigned driver do Uber? I will leave that one there
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Again, I wil just drop it here.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)So I will assume this was a lousy hit piece with more holes than Swiss cheese. Have fun defending an obvious hit piece with a very loud whistle. This is a very tendentious piece.
Have a good day.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Or a limo.
Bernie does not.
Many cities don't have union taxis. Chicago doesn't.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)zalinda
(5,621 posts)calls his taxis, it is probably an aid. Also, there may be a time constraint, waiting for a cab. And, how many times has he used Uber? 1 or 100 times? This is a hit piece.
Z
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Ahem...holes.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)zigby
(125 posts)Weak tea when people raise up e-pitchforks about email systems and dumb comedy sketches, same weak tea as pope visits, subway tokens, and now this.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I may agree with the rest of your examples, but, having worked in cyber security for 10 years, I don't take the issue of our national secrets being subjected to state-sponsored hackers as something light.
MADem
(135,425 posts)You should worry more about those assholes with their dot gov accounts--they're the ones that get hacked.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)is Clinton anti-union?
Off to make phone calls for Bernie.
Sherwin Pishevar
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)So who cares?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)And Hillary too. How many places have union taxis in every place she's visited? How many times/places has her limo/armored car ferried her around?
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Where did you get the idea that most cab drivers are protected by unions today?
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)I've seen their financials - which consist of a stack of daily rental receipts from the companies who own the medallions.
The guy you see behind the wheel most likely doesn't own the cab or the medallion. He's an independent contractor. No Union. No benefits. No minimum wage. Nothing.
I'm no fan of the new "sharing economy" but I pretty much stopped using cabs. Even when I SHOULD be taking cabs. Tired of the bs - no working a/c or not willing to turn it on, rude drivers, refusing to take credit cards, substandard tech. integration.
I'm no fan of uber. But I know for a fact it's not Union versus non Union. Not in Chicago at least.
RandySF
(58,899 posts)Who are riding taxi service out of business in SF and LA by choosing Uber. Yellow Cab, for whom my neighbor drives, just filed for bankruptcy.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)And took a taxi and asked the driver about uber. They are having the same issues over there. A lot of privileged Millenials don't much care about working people if it saves them a dollar or two.
RandySF
(58,899 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Once you've started, there's no going back.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)explain this to a unionized, licensed, regulated taxi driver.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Check out the facts and ignore made up bull shit at this link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511722531
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)of someone you are automatically connected to all his other clients.
No. You aren't.
something that is really terrible to do is okay is you do it only 41% of the time. Great logic.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)I'd be afraid to take Uber.
**that's just a joke.
edited to add: the afraid part (is a joke). I do watch too much criminal minds-that's true.