2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew York IS NOT Hillary's home state....that'd be Illinois (Which she barely won, BTW).
She may have been a senator for New York, but it IS Bernie's home state.
Just a point of clarification.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)But my hometown, when asked, is Detroit, MI.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and many of you were posting polls that had him down 20, just two weeks ago.
I think he's surged in the NY polls. And we've still got an entire week to go.
The last CBS poll shows her ahead by 10 points. This is a competitive race.
Bernie has a lot of enthusiasm in NY. He's also got some advantages as well.
We've got a debate coming up and several days of campaigning!
Both candidates will be out of the state this weekend, after the debate. Bernie in Italy and Hillary in California at her back-to-back $350,000 per plate fundraisers with George Clooney.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Getting a NY address for the purpose of running for the position of U.S. Senator from NY is carpetbagging. And, yes, I know RFK did that, too. But I bet no one ever cahlled him a Noo Yawkah.
still_one
(92,217 posts)I was born in Iowa, but have lived in California for several decades. My home state is California, and that is where I pay taxes and vote
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Home state is where you were born...not where you choose to lay your head.
still_one
(92,217 posts)DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)It looks like she only won Chicago.
And lost the rest of the state handily.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Dirt doesn't vote, bro.
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)That's a low blow.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)You parroted the GOP's "point" that larger masses of land support their candidate, while the other side's are smaller. It is a false narrative that the other side has hardly any support, when in fact they do, it is just more concentrated in urban, thus high-density population, centers.
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)You have to admit it is a little weird seeing all these states with most counties solid green for Sanders and then just the city county dark blue for Clinton.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)How in the world is that a right-wing talking point?
Your "talking point"--is that every discussion, analysis and thought that isn't glowing about Hillary--is somehow a right-wing talking point--is bizarre.
The KKK doesn't support Bernie. The next time you're discussing a state in which Bernie lost, I'll be sure to be as intellectually consistent as you are when I say, "So, tired of you peddling the same KKK talking points!"
Like it or not, many groups, beyond the Hillary bubble, do not like her nor do they want her near the White House. That includes 99 percent of Republicans, most Independents and half of the Democratic party.
questionseverything
(9,656 posts)hc "won" the entire state by about 36,000 votes
many reports of ballots running out and even corrupt election officials not allowing students to register
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Hillary hasn't lived in Illinois since she was a teenager, I believe. Sanders hasn't lived in New York in almost 50 years.
Get over it.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)it kind of is her home state, bro. Much more so than a Vermonter who has not lived in New York since 1968.
This isn't 1890. People move around nowadays.
Give it a try, there's more to the world than your neighborhood.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Someone who was born and raised there, but who got the hell out of Dodge as soon as he was old enough, or someone who voluntarily made New York her home for the last 16 years and then was twice elected as one of the New York's US Senators. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders has been a resident of Vermont for the last 50 years. Who has a better claim to New York as her home state? Whoa that's a tough one.....
I was born, raised and went to college in Louisiana, but I haven't lived there since I was 22 years old. Therefore I no longer claim that Louisiana as my "home state". And, by the way, go back and look and Sanders speeches and writings since he first started running for office in Vermont. You be damn sure that he didn't claim New York as his "home state" until he started to look for votes in the New York State primary. Then all of a sudden it's, "Look everybody, I'm a native!"
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)And now that you have had your ass kicked playing your childish game you don't want to play any more? That sad, but still very funny.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I don't waste time playing with people who want to act like children.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)But now I am starting to feel sorry for you.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Bernie actually grew up there. She didn't voluntarily make NY her home, she got the senate seat. Another quality she has. Using people to gain power.
Ain't gonna work this time.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)New York elected Hillary to the Senate, despite your objections, not once but twice, so evidently they like being used in the Empire State.
And it is going "work this time". Sanders is going to lose big time in Brooklyn where he grew up and he is going to lose state wide.
The problem for Bernie is that he can't even survive a "statistical tie" in New York. If Sanders were to win 57% - 43% he would simply keep on pace to draw even with Hillary with pledged delegates by the time the last primary is done. That means that if Sanders needs to beat Hillary by 14% in New York. If he blows this opportunity in a huge electoral state like New York, the percentage he has to win by goes up dramatically in all the remaining states.
And noticed I haven't said a word about super delegates.
Right now the most favorable polls show Sanders 10 points behind. (Two polls which came out today show him 13 points behind, but I'm being kind here.) So in less than a week now Sanders has to make up those 10 points and then surge ahead of Hillary by 14 points. If you think that Bernie is going to be a beneficiary of 24 point turn around in less than a week, good luck with that.
apnu
(8,758 posts)W was born in Connecticut but everybody in Texas was happy to have him as a Texan. Nobody cares.
Don't we have better things to talk about and debate? Like policy maybe instead of this cafeteria food-fight bullshit?
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)If New Yorkers buy off on that false notion, they'll be more inclined to vote for her. So, in answer to your question about who gives a fuck.... lots of people do.
randome
(34,845 posts)Because you have so much time and energy invested in that. Seriously, did you poll the people of New York to determine their outrage levels?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I mean, people always post about things they don't care about on political websites right?
apnu
(8,758 posts)Both in the City and Upstate, as well as Long Island. Nobody in New York cares. They know she's not "from" NY, lots of people aren't "from" New York and are accepted as New Yorkers.
I was born on Staten Island (don't laugh), but spent half my life in Chicago, I consider myself a Chicagoan, I love the city, I love the food, and I love the sports, nobody here cares I'm "from" NY.
Its distracting food fight bullshit. Its the same accusations of carpet bagging the Republicans tried and failed on her when she ran for the Senate. Bringing it up again is recycling Republican memes, that's damn sad.
BTW, I voted for Bernie in the IL primary, just want to make that clear before you accuse me of being a Hill-bot.
I'm fine arguing her positions and policies, but this stuff? Its juvenile retreading of Republican talking points. We are all better than that.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)You don't speak for all of New York. I know folks in Syracuse who do care about where Hillary is actually from. It makes a difference to them...and I'm sure it'll make a difference to others. But go on ahead and pretend it doesn't matter.
apnu
(8,758 posts)Hope that works out for you.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)So long!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)You posted a OP on DU to inform New York voters that they are wrong if they believe that New York is Hillary's home state? Yep, I'm sure that you are going to reach a whole bunch of NY voters who aren't convinced one way or another using that method.
(I used the icon because I wasn't sure you would understand I was being sarcastic.)
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I just take insipid comments such as yours as examples of what to watch for. I can always count on the hillbots here to go ape-shit over any little thing that might cast a negative light on Her. Thanks for playing by the way!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)But it was a good choice to try it out first - that will save you a lot of public ridicule later.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)So long!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Let's talk after the NY primary. By the way, the two polls that came out today both show Sanders 13 points and he needs to beat Hillary 57% to 43% to keep on pace to catch Hillary in the pledged delegate category. So he needs to make up the catch up those 13 points he is behind and then beat by 14 points in the final voting.
So your boy needs a 27 point surge in less than a week just to keep on pace to catch Hillary by the time the last primary is run.
No problem right? When you dream of magic and unicorns anything is possible.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Have a good one!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)They will give you excellent odds on that propitiation..
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)7 measly little points... and that, of course, is presuming the polls are right. Which, by the way, I don't. Cheers!
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Right now Hillary holds a 13 point lead in the polls - so let's say it is Clinton 56.5% to Sanders 43.5% (a 13% gap) In order to earn enough delegates to be on pace to draw even with Clinton before the convention, Sanders would have to win New York by 14% - say Sanders 57.0% Clinton 43%. To make any real progress and make up for any future loses it would be best for him to win by far more than 14%, but anything less and Sanders falls further behind with New York a big missed opportunity.
Now you can look at the situation in one of two ways which are in the in perfectly identical. 1) Sanders would have to turn a predicted 14% loss into a 13% win meaning a 27% turnaround. Or you could say the same thing by saying that Sanders has to climb from a projected loss with 43.5% of the vote to a win with 57.0% of the vote - a gain of 13.5% while his opponent Clinton loses 13.5% of the vote.
Regardless of how wish to view the situation Sanders needs increase his totals by 13.5% not "7 measly little points".
And of course you don't believe the polls, as we have previously discussed, you don't let reality intrude into your life.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)If Bernie increases his percentage by 7 points, do you think Hillary would just magically stay at 57%? So, If I'm to follow your awfully strange logic, Bernie would be at 50% and hilly would be at 57%. So, now you believe there's extra 7% of votes that just appeared from thin air? *SMH*
Here's a clue for you... if Bernie's numbers go up, while Hillary is at a static number, her votes *gasp!* go down as an overall percentage! But hey... feel free to not let pesky things like math intrude into your life.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)This time will try to keep it very simple:
Right now Sanders is 12 points behind Hillary: Hillary 56% to Sanders 44% (difference 12%)
But on average Sanders is way behind in pledged delegates so he has to do more than just tie Hillary; he has to win 57% of the delegates in every remaining contest including New York.
So in New York Sanders has to win like this: Hillary 43% to Sanders 57% (difference 14%)
So if Sanders can go from 44% of the vote to 57% (while Hillary goes from 56% to 43%) Sanders will have done what he has to do in New York, if just barely.
So to improve from 44% of the vote to 57%: 57% - 44% = 13% - Sanders has to improve 13 points, not 7.
Bottom line: Sanders has to go from losing badly to winning big in New York in less than a week. Sanders is spending tons of money in New York because he simply cannot afford to lose the state or his campaign is for all practical purposes will be over. However, I will be extremely surprised if he can even pull into a "virtual tie" and split the delegates evenly with Hillary, and that is not near good enough.
If this is not simple enough, you're truly hopeless.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Nope. I'm done with you. Not going to simply stand here and let you move the goal posts on this conversation, so you can frame it that you were really talking about the overall primary... not when it's been exceedingly clear, this has been about New York. So, here's a fork... stick it in yourself, cause your done... and this conversation is over. So long.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Lyrics from "Positively 4th Street" by Bob Dylan
I wish that for just one time you could stand inside my shoes
And just for that one moment I could be you
Yes, I wish that for just one time you could stand inside my shoes
You'd know what a drag it is to see you
DebDoo
(319 posts)My state to worm her way into political office. And it angers me further that the wormhole she created is being used as proof of belonging when in reality she's nothing more than an unwelcome guest who's overstayed.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Sanders home state is Vermont, which in represents in the United States Senate.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)There's a reason most people say they're "from" the state they were born in...because that's their home state. It's even defined in legalese as the location in which a child is initially a resident for 6 consecutive months. Hilly was in Illinois for much longer than 6 months from birth... making it her home state.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Clinton certainly didn't get any out of Illinois. In politics, home state advantage tends to come from where you have actually served, which is why Clinton is leading by double digits in New York. Sanders serves Vermont, not New York.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Enjoy your day.
msongs
(67,413 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Unless you are Rick Santorum, who thinks higher education is for snobs, most people support others who strive for a better education.
you funny
jillan
(39,451 posts)matter where you end up.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)This thread is hilarious.
jillan
(39,451 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)... and it's not as though Bernie wasn't touting Vermont as his home state. You can only have one, isn't that what you're saying?
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Bernie's home state always was and is New York... that doesn't change just because he resides in Vermont. He may consider it his home (I'd be surprised if he didn't), but that doesn't change his home state.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)And a state he hasn't done shit for
RandySF
(58,898 posts)More pretzel logic.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Pretzel logic would be suggesting a person can just decide where their home state is. No one gets to decide where they're going to be born... life doesn't work that way. Unless you're a timelord I suppose... are you a timelord RandySF?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)he contributed nothing to that state...apparently not even employment taxes haa haa haa
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Response to Bubzer (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)MFM008
(19,814 posts)you Sanders guys would take a win is a win is a win. right?
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)state the candidate is from. it should be about who is most qualified.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Sanders is still not going to win NY.