Side-by-side: Clinton vs. Sanders on authority of Dodd-Frank to break up big banks

[bigtree]

Zachary Fedell ?@zatchry 18h18 hours ago Austin, TX
Side-by-side: Clinton vs. Sanders on authority of Dodd-Frank to break up big banks.







New York Daily News ?@NYDailyNews 13h13 hours ago
Here's both our transcripts:
@HillaryClinton: http://nydn.us/1Yqlz98
@BernieSanders: http://nydn.us/1YqlAKs

[ViseGrip]

1. Interesting, they didn't look up Bernie's bill to breakup the banks BEFORE they interviewed him?

They never planned a fair interview. That's okay, the NYT cleared that up the next day, by printing Bernie Sander's senate bill in the paper.

Again, it was there for The Daily News to refer to. This is not journalism.

[Viva_La_Revolution]

8. ^^this^^

[Vinca]

2. Bernie has expanded on his ideas for breaking up the banks, but the real question is -

who would have the will to break up the big banks? Unlikely someone who's been paid $250,000 by them for a single, solitary speech.

[Lucinda]

3. KNR

[JonLeibowitz]

4. Interesting. It appears that you, bigtree, do not realize that Sanders' questions here are NOT

about Dodd-Frank at all!

That is quite embarrassing for you.

ETA: Just to be clear, authority to break up too big to fail banks is a completely separate issue than the specific legal statutes broken by the big banks.

[geek tragedy]

5. "All of them, Katie." nt

[MattP]

6. Bernie knows what he wants but no idea how to get there

[TCJ70]

7. I think you're title should be: Apples and Oranges n/t