2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs Karl Rove helping the Hillary for President campaign?
Seems Karl's chumming around with James Carville, touring the lecture circuit together.
https://www.smu.edu/TateSeries/LectureSchedule
Not that there's anything wrong with making a buck.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)JAMES CARVILLE: I think that they were, you know, obviously, politics -- if somebody doesn't run against you, the general reaction is that's a good thing.
Joe and I have a different take.
Look, you know, the kind of unofficial slogan in a Hillary campaign. The dogs bark, the caravan rolls." And that's pretty much what it is. It is an old Arab proverb.
SOURCE: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/10/22/james_carville_clinton_2016_motto_is_the_dogs_bark_and_the_caravan_rolls_an_old_arab_proverb.html
Movable feast, their club, administration to administration.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)America Rising, a Republican political action committee, reacted with glee on social media on Tuesday to a CNN/WMUR poll that showed Mr. Sanders with a large lead over Mrs. Clinton in New Hampshire, sharing the news with BREAKING qualifiers and links to news stories.
Karl Roves American Crossroads recently created an ad parroting Senator Bernie Sanderss critiques of Mrs. Clintons ties to Wall Street, made repeatedly last week in the days before Sundays debate.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/20/bernie-sanders-gets-some-outside-help-he-didnt-ask-for/?_r=0
Rove is helping Sanders. I don't need to form it as a question as you have done in order to create a deceptive link to the original question you pose.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)So Rove is actually helping Hillary...
Octafish
(55,745 posts)"Hypocrisy Alert!" -- Zach Carter
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/karl-rove-hillary-clinton-wall-st_us_569bd413e4b0778f46f9a52f
Armstead
(47,803 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I think was a huge lie--in my state it appeared to be.
I never saw ONE anti-HIllary Clinton ad in Iowa, where Rove had supposedly spent all of this money to attack Hillary (because she was the stronger candidate that they just HAD to destroy!).
I think all of that was bullshit.
I live in the largest media market in Iowa. My husband and I both work at home and two television are on all day. We saw television ads from every candidate, Dem and Rep, and we never, ever saw one of these alleged ads.
No one in Iowa that I know ever saw one either.
I think that was just some big lie perpetrated by all of the players. They were trying to say that Bernie was such a weak candidate and Hillary was so powerful and wonderful--that Rove was doing this to try and take down Hillary. I think that was nothing more than a soundbyte without the ad buys (in Iowa anyway).
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and it featured attacks on her Wall Street money.
I never saw a "Pro Bernie" ad in Iowa--other than Sander's campaign ads.
The television ad--featured in the New York Times article--never played in the biggest media market in Iowa--which covers the largest city in Iowa and nearly half the state.
Furthermore, if these ads had run in Iowa, I am sure this would have been "news" in Iowa.
No mention of these Karl Rove ads running in Iowa.
I don't think these ads existed in Iowa.
Who knows...maybe they ran them once, just to cover their bases. <snicker>
Any Rove ads (whether pro Hillary or anti-Bernie) were never a factor in the Iowa campaigns.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Lots of stuff is different from what we're told -- and not told -- by the tee vee.
When they interfere with Democracy, We the People have a real problem.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)to further the talking point that "Hillary is the stronger candidate and Bernie is weak. The Republicans want to run against Bernie, so they're trying to hurt Hillary."
Funny thing is...these ads never became a part of the media landscape in Iowa.
Where are the ads?!?!
Here's a New York Times articles about Iowans being inundated with television ads. No mention of any Rove ads. These ads NEVER played a factor in the Iowa Caucuses. They were never discussed in our state.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/26/us/politics/as-iowa-caucuses-approach-political-ads-swamp-tv-channels.html
There's the suggestion that Rove was doing this, but there is not one article that talks about where these ads actually ran (ABC/CBS/NBC?) and in which day parts.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)American Crossroadsfounded by former Bush adviser Karl Roveand several other conservative-backed super PACs have spent the last month intentionally fueling the Bern, but their zeal has more to do with an effort to weaken Hillary Clinton, whom they still see as the likely Democratic nominee and harder to defeat in the general election.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/23/bernie-sanders-s-conservative-fanboys.html
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Lump that source into the same trash can as BNR and Media Matters.
Doesn't Chelsea sit on the board or something for TDB?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)My point clearly stands on much stronger ground than the deception of the op. I'm sure I will find your disapproval to the use of Judicial Watch material by this op in other threads, right? lol. Not a chance. It's the Clintons you are against. Some things are really clear.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But Republicans are doing much more than just sending out debate-night emails that happen to be friendly to Sanders cause. American Crossroads, the GOP dark money group founded by Karl Rove, is running ads in Iowa depicting Clinton as a tool of Wall Street.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/1/21/1471660/-Republicans-are-trying-to-help-Bernie-Sanders-win-and-it-s-not-because-they-like-his-message
Octafish
(55,745 posts)brooklynite
(94,595 posts)Occam's Razor.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)How can Carville be friends with that guy?
brooklynite
(94,595 posts)I don't profess to know all the details of this case, but if President Obama isn't moving to pardon him, and Senator Sanders isn't making noise about it, perhaps there's more to the case than "railroading".
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Governor Siegelman expresses his appreciation to Senator Bernie Sanders for introducing a bill in the U.S. Senate, on 17 September 2015, to ban private prisons.
From Sen Sanderss webpage:
Private Prisons
Sen. Bernie Sanders introduced a bill on Thursday that would ban private prisons within a few years, taking aim at what he called a "broken criminal justice system" and mass incarceration, Vox reported.
In addition to eliminating private prisons, the legislation would make it cheaper for families to visit and speak with inmates, Mother Jones reported. If passed, the bill would have a disproportionate affect on immigration prisons. Thats because around half of all U.S. immigration prisons are privatized, Latin Times reported.
From personal experience, Governor Siegelman sees the need for massive prison reform in the US. He has been contacting members of congress to pass the SAFE Justice Act.
Please contact Senator Sanders at http://www.sanders.senate.gov/ and thank him for introducing this bill. Contact your U.S. Senator and Representative and ask them to support Senator Sanders bill.
I am waiting for more info on Bernie's bill, bill number, language, etc.
CONTINUED w/links to details...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/9/21/1423494/-Don-Siegelman-Supports-Bernie-Sanders-Prison-Reform-Bill
One thing I do know: I won't chose Karl Rove over Don Siegelman.
PufPuf23
(8,787 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Four years after Karl Rove wasted over $300 million from establishment GOP donors in his unsuccessful attempt to use his Super PAC American Crossroads to elect Mitt Romney president, hes started running ads in the Democratic primary race against Hillary Clinton in Iowa. Why?
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/19/karl_rove_has_a_secret_plan_to_ratfck_hillary_and_make_himself_millions/
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)I thought it was for county/count election shenanigans, as Rove owns the 'private software'. They all want Hillary, for the money buckets will continue to pass through the same entities. This means more war.
melm00se
(4,993 posts)Is Karl Rove helping the Hillary for President campaign?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511712926
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This shit is completely inappropriate for DU. Still election season people. Let's not carry the right wing's water for them here.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 12, 2016, 10:39 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A valid question, regardless of the answer
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Since when is asking a question against the rules here?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While the argument could be made that they are "chumming around", the reality is that this is long standing academic lecture series and this particular event will be moderated by Jim Lehrer
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The OP is factual. Are they on stage together or not? The alerter doesn't want the facts to be known.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Balderdash.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Thank you for the heads-up, melm00se!
amborin
(16,631 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)if anything, Karl Rove has been helping the Bernie campaign.
http://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/recips.php?cycle=2016&cmte=c00487363
Sid
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)A true ratfucker. Thankfully very few are stupid enough to fall for his ratfucking.
hagoodman.com
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Republicans Should Help Bernie Sanders to Weaken Hillary
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420262/bernie-sanders-republicans-myra-adams
Octafish
(55,745 posts)NCTraveler's source: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420262/bernie-sanders-republicans-myra-adams
Ever hear of William F. Buckley?
Details:
Gore Vidal vs. William F. 'Crypto Nazi' Buckley in 1968
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And you are correct, ratfucking is exactly what is going on here. Pretty brazen of you to admit it.
Gothmog
(145,317 posts)The GOP really wants to run against a weaker candidate http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-karl-rove-attack
In a Tuesday evening statement, the Clinton campaign's communications director, Jennifer Palmieri, mentioned an ad from the Rove-aligned super PAC American Crossroads, which accused Clinton of being in Wall Street's pocket. Palmieri said the ad suggests that Republicans want to face Sanders in the general election.
"While Senator Sanders tries to make a case on electability based on meaningless polls, Republicans and their super PACs have made clear the candidate theyre actually afraid to face. The Sanders argument falls apart when the GOP spokesman is trying to help him and the Republicans run ads trying to stop Hillary Clinton in the primary," she said in the statement.
Karl Rove is running an attack ad against Clinton. Rove is doing this for one purpose which is to weaken the strongest candidate
Octafish
(55,745 posts)FEBRUARY 18, 2016: The latest Quinnipiac Poll of national voters shows that Bernie Sanders performs MUCH better than Hillary Clinton against potential GOP opponents.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/2/20/1488200/-LATEST-POLL-Bernie-Sanders-is-MUCH-more-electable-than-Hillary-Clinton
FWIW: I have a YUGE nose. Very big. One of the biggest people have seen. I can see my nose when I cross my eyes. Some men after age 40 never see their nose.
Gothmog
(145,317 posts)Sanders has not been vetted Dana Milbank has some good comments on general election match up polls https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/democrats-would-be-insane-to-nominate-bernie-sanders/2016/01/26/0590e624-c472-11e5-a4aa-f25866ba0dc6_story.html?hpid=hp_opinions-for-wide-side_opinion-card-a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
Watching Sanders at Monday nights Democratic presidential forum in Des Moines, I imagined how Trump or another Republican nominee would disembowel the relatively unknown Vermonter.
The first questioner from the audience asked Sanders to explain why he embraces the socialist label and requested that Sanders define it so that it doesnt concern the rest of us citizens.
Sanders, explaining that much of what he proposes is happening in Scandinavia and Germany (a concept that itself alarms Americans who dont want to be like socialized Europe), answered vaguely: Creating a government that works for all of us, not just a handful of people on the top thats my definition of democratic socialism.
But thats not how Republicans will define socialism and theyll have the dictionary on their side. Theyll portray Sanders as one who wants the government to own and control major industries and the means of production and distribution of goods. Theyll say he wants to take away private property. That wouldnt be fair, but it would be easy. Socialists dont win national elections in the United States .
Sanders on Monday night also admitted he would seek massive tax increases one of the biggest tax hikes in history, as moderator Chris Cuomo put it to expand Medicare to all. Sanders, this time making a comparison with Britain and France, allowed that hypothetically, youre going to pay $5,000 more in taxes, and declared, W e will raise taxes, yes we will. He said this would be offset by lower health-insurance premiums and protested that its demagogic to say, oh, youre paying more in taxes.
Well, yes and Trump is a demagogue.
Sanders also made clear he would be happy to identify Democrats as the party of big government and of wealth redistribution. When Cuomo said Sanders seemed to be saying he would grow government bigger than ever, Sanders didnt quarrel, saying, P eople want to criticize me, okay, and F ine, if thats the criticism, I accept it.
Sanders accepts it, but are Democrats ready to accept ownership of socialism, massive tax increases and a dramatic expansion of government? If so, they will lose.
Match up polls are worthless because these polls do not measure what would happen to Sanders in a general election where Sanders is very vulnerable to negative ads.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)the even said so in their FEC filings, as reported by opensecrets:
https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/recips.php?cmte=C00487363&cycle=2016
Sid
Gothmog
(145,317 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)will damage her in the GE, if she does become the candidate.
Sid
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Among the Hillary emails that have been released was a really pathetic one from Lanny Davis groveling for her to speak to or issue a nice statement for a writer who was doing a cover story on a new law/public relations practice Davis was opening. Davis named some people who had already agreed, including Bill Clinton and some politicians and/or political operatives from both parties including Karl Rove!
It's all just one big happy family in the political establishment. After the political fights, they gather at conferences and exchange laughs and stories over drinks.