2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Abandoning Education Reform
"New York is a hotbed of anti-testing activism, especially in affluent suburban districts, where parents who equate testing with excessive curriculum pressure have joined forces with teachers unions who see standardized tests as a tool that subjects them to unwanted accountability. Hillary Clinton has already distanced herself from the education-reform movement, which is a predictable course of action for a Democrat facing a contested primary. The looming New York primary has raised the pressure for her to placate the burgeoning opt-out movement, which encourages students to boycott standardized tests. Bill Clinton asserted last week that even one national test per year is too many. The idea of having to give a national test every year for five years in a row for people from the third to the eighth grade doesnt make as much sense as investing the same amount of money in helping the teachers to be better teachers.
There are certainly reasons to believe some schools spend too much time on tests and that consolidation is in order. But this is an odd position for a liberal politician to take, for many reasons. The resource cost to implement a single annual national test is minuscule. And the use of data to measure the effectiveness of public policy is a foundation of progressive governance going back more than a century. Opting out of tests degrades their value as a data tool and makes it harder, or even impossible, for policymakers to measure what is working and what isnt.
What's more, testing is an important tool to measure racial and economic equality. A report this year by Ulrich Boser and Catherine Brown at the Center for American Progress found that states that use standards-based reform have produced better outcomes for low-income children. (My wife, Robin Chait, used to work as an education-policy analyst at CAP, and now works for a public charter school.) Not surprisingly, civil-rights organizations representing African-Americans and Latinos have argued to keep in place annual national testing."
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/04/hillary-clinton-abandoning-education-reform.html
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)Hills
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I guess the name is growing on me... Sounds like nilla wafers and now I'm hungry.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)DetroitSocialist83
(169 posts)Politics is local. Focus on his roots being born there, fracking, education, trade deals, wall st reform ect. He should be able to make headway in the debate if he doesn't allow her to muddy the water.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Unless all schools have the same classes, same hours, same plans. My son went to a school that did not offer the same classes as the school in the rich neighborhood 5 miles away. So of course they tested higher.
We need to address the issue of equality before we worry about test! Same money to ALL schools, same books, same classes then we can talk standardized tests.