Tomorrows NYDN Headline $$ReleaseTheTranscripts!

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

[morningfog]

1. Love it.

[timmymoff]

2. Please release them, let them go!

[Art_from_Ark]

18. "For they, don't love you, anymore..."

[Segami]

20. Altogether, once again....

[itsrobert]

3. Love it

Shows Bernie is losing and desperate for a bone.

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

8. How does it show that?

They roasted Bernie first... Maybe Hilli Vanili should have went first then Sanders headline would have been the lasting impression. Smart move by Bernie to do the NYDN first.

[JackRiddler]

42. Sanders chooses the Daily News front page?

Last week I thought according to Camp Clinton the Daily News was the greatest paper ever.

[itsrobert]

43. what part of 'Bernie renews call....'

do you not understand. DESPERATE.

[JackRiddler]

50. He does that all the time?

Why is it the front page today?

Can you spell G-O-L-D, man? (Sorry if you're not a man, it's a joke.)

As in Goldman Sachs just agreed to a 5.1 billion dollar "settlement" with the Justice Deparment on allegations of far-reaching MBS fraud prior to the 2008 Wall Street crash.

Same Goldman Sachs that paid $225 K for a 1-hour appearance by HRC.

Sorry if the timing of this independent event doesn't suit you.

[jillan]

4. Is this a joke? Because I so badly do not want it to be.

[Segami]

24. Its no joke.

[jillan]

25. Yay!!!

[babylonsister]

5. Holy mackeral! nt

[beedle]

6. Hopefully they were so embarrassed

about not knowing anything about The Finance Dept, Dodd Frank, the Fed, and Banks, that they decided they need to at least tell some of the truth abut Hillary.

[CorporatistNation]

7. Release The Transcripts Madam Secretary.... LOL

Hillary Knows that she is in the weeds here and cannot get out without big consequences...

&nohtml5=False

Warren Makes A Fool of Herself Here...

&nohtml5=False

[Segami]

23. lol!

[ozone_man]

32. Warren is disappointing.

She really needs to stand up to Wall Street sleaze.

[Agschmid]

36. She's burned bridges on both sides at this point.

[shenmue]

53. And under the bus with Sen. Warren

[NastyRiffraff]

65. Yeah not only is she not "pure" enough

but she is failing to support Sanders! How dare she?

[beedle]

9. R&K

[Uncle Joe]

10. My guess is that in those speeches Hillary exclusively blamed average American Home buyers for

the crash of 2007-2008 and never said a word in regards to the mega-bank and mortgage corporations' culpability because they were paying her most generous speaking fees.

Thanks for the thread, GeorgiaPeanuts

[arcane1]

27. At minimum. I suspect something else is there: Jokes about how much money was made in the crash.

[Uncle Joe]

63. I agree arcane, "at a minimum," I was trying to be gulp "conservative."

[northernsouthern]

29. Well...

In her defense if no one bought a home there never would have been a crash...so technically?

[bvar22]

60. If no one bought a home,

there would have been a BIGGER crash.
The Pyramid Scam the Big Banks were running would have collapsed if they had had to stop hard selling bad mortgages, bundling them up, and selling the whole stinking package to naive and greedy buyers and investors..

[northernsouthern]

61. Are you sure?

Imagine they stop selling, then all we have capitalwise is the bad bundles, they would suddenly go up in value since it would become a limited stock. Banks would fight over them. I am not sure how my blanket statement would cover foreclosed homes since I am saying no one would buy. Perhaps since the banks could never sell the m again they would go out of their was to make sure people could afford their homes and work with the people. All real estate would switch to just dealing with rentals. New construction would all convert or to repair. We would suddenly care more about creating quality than sprawl, our communities would force to become better since we could no longer just move away. We would become Europe with beautiful ancient cities. I don't see the down side here. I am sure there is zero logical flaws in my thinking.

[bvar22]

66. You are sure there are no logical flaws in your thinking?

What will you do about population expansion?
I guess they could all live at your house?

[northernsouthern]

67. Ahhh I already thought of that!

It would force us to have extended families and it would create a sense of community and a global family. It would also control population growth...it is way harder to get in the mood when you share your place with every other member of your family.!

[basselope]

11. Don't think for a moment that recordings of these speeches don't exist.

They will come out before the general election, when the GOP wants ammo.

Right now they want to make sure the weaker candidate (Hillary) doesn't get too damaged... yet.

[kgnu_fan]

15. kick

[TheBlackAdder]

48. It's a risk. If she releases doctored transcripts, video or audio will prove deception.

.


Is there anyone out there who is stupid enough not to think that those meetings weren't recorded for company or private use?


.

[azmom]

12. Kick

[kgnu_fan]

13. kick

[MattP]

14. this from a guy that has never in his time in office ever released his tax returns ever

His whole time in office he's only released what 4 pages, he demands transparency from everybody but himself

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

28. Ok... And your opinion on the transcripts?

[JonLeibowitz]

34. So when Bernie releases his recent tax returns you will want her to release Transcripts?

[CentralCoaster]

39. No, after that the goalpost will move, again. And they'll want to see his birth certificate.

Not a copy, they'll want the long form certified certificate of live birth!

[Segami]

41. You want Bernie to release his tax returns but Hillary's secret speech transcripts get a free pass?

Why?.....

[cui bono]

16. #ReleaseTheTranscripts

Do it.

Do it now.

.

[dana_b]

17. awesome... I hope this really gets the people

who are still undecided thinking

[ViseGrip]

19. Oh my gawd! Good, cuz it needs to be said until she releases them!

[Segami]

21. KICK KICK KICK

[SocialLibFiscalCon]

22. Love it!! But Daily News doing it makes me a little uneasy.

While I am one who has been dying for Bernie to turn up the heat on this issue, Mort Zuckerman is a big Clinton supporter. Daily News has certainly had a Hillary bias so far this election season.

Is it possible that the speech "transcripts" have now been sufficiently "white-washed" for public consumption and they've confirmed that no audio exists? From what I heard, she made sure that the only copies/recordings were to be her property.

Is this the set-up for a Monday surprise before the NY Primary that she releases the "transcripts" and the media says "nothing to see here" and it actually helps her show how "honest" she is?

I don't' know but Daily News involvement makes me nervous....

[revbones]

26. She's had ample time to re-write them by now. nt

[EndElectoral]

30. Release the Kraken...and the transcripts!

[Segami]

37. lol!

[TeeYiYi]

45. Oh my hell...

...that's a funny gif! I am literally laughing out loud...

TYY

[MissDeeds]

31. W00T!!!

K&R

[oasis]

33. Available for viewing at the Hillary Rodham Clinton Presidential Library

in the year, 2025. If you're still interested.

[one_voice]

35. 52+ a day.

[AzDar]

38. K & R

[CharlotteVale]

40. Wasn't this supposed to be her hometown paper that was gonna

pay her eternal homage just because she was Hillary Clinton and Bernie wasn't?

Guess that must have been some other paper, LOL.

[ViseGrip]

44. The Clinton campaign is imploding. End of story.

[Kittycat]

46. The Truth Shall Set You Free.....

[revbones]

47. Uh-oh. Wasn't the NY Daily News the Hillary-follower favorite last week?

Can't wait to watch the heads explode:


Hillary follower: "The NY Daily News says Bernie doesn't know how to break up the banks!"

Bernie supporter: "The NYTimes debunked that and proved Bernie was right. What about today's cover?"

Hillary follower: "Meh, the NY Daily News is just a rag. I think they're just a right-wing source now. Let me alert on you for mentioning them on DU..."

[sadoldgirl]

49. Since they are her property

anything she might release now, if she does,
is earmarked for her audience.People should
always remember her trustworthiness.

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

54. Well I think she could fake them too...

Wouldn't put it past ole Hilli Vanilli

[ViseGrip]

51. Gosh her campaign must be over and tumbling now....

[dchill]

52. K&R!

[pdsimdars]

57. If this is for real, good on them!

[JackRiddler]

58. They switched to a different anti-Clinton message.

I would have preferred the big issue of the Goldman Sachs settlement and the speeches to that of the "CP time" affair, which they have on the front page this morning. (Photo of Clinton & De Blasio on the stage, headline: SKIT FOR BRAINS.)

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nydn-front-pages-2016-gallery-1.2482879?pmSlide=1.2597286

This obviously doesn't help turnout for HRC.

Inside there are two pages on the GS settlement and a positive treatment of the Sanders response.

[kristopher]

59. The transcripts could place her in legal jeopardy if she stated she was running.

If she made a declaration that she was running for president during those speeches, then the money she was raising with the speeches becomes an illegal contribution, doesn't it?

[2cannan]

62. Interesting point. I bet people during the Q&As asked if she was planning to run again. nt

[JackRiddler]

64. Oh snap.

Odds are she managed to avoid such an elementary error.

Fundraising basics are her wheelhouse, after all.