Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Angrily Defends Paid Speeches, Defiant On Releasing Transcripts (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 OP
But what does she say about tasteless racist jokes? Android3.14 Apr 2016 #1
Blinded by hubris. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #21
She did nothing racist. apcalc Apr 2016 #37
Perhaps, it's not just the ass-kissing of big banks but more racist jokes in there that's Broward Apr 2016 #2
Does make one wonder, doesn't it? bjo59 Apr 2016 #28
The transcripts I won't let you see contain nothing anyone should see. merrily Apr 2016 #3
The FBI have recovered all of them . . . . . pdsimdars Apr 2016 #8
Maybe, but that was not what she had in mind when she had the server wiped. merrily Apr 2016 #10
First She Wanted Bernie's Speeches... There Were None... Still Would Not Release The Transcripts! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #24
Well Damn, That setup was pretty hostile. timlot Apr 2016 #4
she doesn't sound angry at all. defiant? ummm no, she disagrees with the questioner's lecture nt msongs Apr 2016 #5
I used the title from the youtube video... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #11
Deflect. . . she NEVER answers the questions asked. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #6
I don't understand how anyone could be satisfied with her answer. I really don't. hedda_foil Apr 2016 #7
^This Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #23
This is not important. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #9
It there was nothing to see she would have released them. JRLeft Apr 2016 #12
Thats only obvious FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #14
If she ever released them it would be game over. JRLeft Apr 2016 #18
But but .. Its My Turn ... We don't need no stinking Transcripts !! FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #13
The short version of her answer: no, because there's a "double standard." JudyM Apr 2016 #15
You have to admit, she is very skilled at playing the victim card, she practices a lot Dragonfli Apr 2016 #16
She cannot show us how transparent she is, sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #17
She would lose all of her support. JRLeft Apr 2016 #19
I hope Bernie brings it up in the debate SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #20
I bet Trump does exactly that if she is the nominee. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #22
He can't do it until Jane releases the tax returns. grasswire Apr 2016 #27
KICK! Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #25
I didn't care for her tone there, kind of "fussy" like she felt picked on, bullied. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #26
perpetual victim grasswire Apr 2016 #29
And some want to give us more time with her Politicalboi Apr 2016 #33
She must be getting very tired of the peasants questioning her right to the throne... Yurovsky Apr 2016 #30
Have any other candidates been paid for Wall Street speeches? Funtatlaguy Apr 2016 #31
Can a tax payer sue Clinton for release of speeches? Arizona Roadrunner Apr 2016 #32
When Bernie releases his taxes will she change her tune? NT. Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #34
Whaaa whaaa whaaa!! Why is everybody always picking on me? Avalux Apr 2016 #35
Jesus Christ, release the fucking speeches. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #36
The speeches... apcalc Apr 2016 #38
Absolutely pathetic BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #39
Forever evasive Laughing Mirror Apr 2016 #42
Hillary made some weird comment on MTP last week challenging others to release their emails 2cannan Apr 2016 #40
oh, for fucks sake! Poor little put upon victim. Her lies and bbgrunt Apr 2016 #41

Broward

(1,976 posts)
2. Perhaps, it's not just the ass-kissing of big banks but more racist jokes in there that's
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:05 PM
Apr 2016

holding her back.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
3. The transcripts I won't let you see contain nothing anyone should see.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:06 PM
Apr 2016

Just like the emails that I did not give to State after I had the server wiped contained nothing anyone should see.


CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
24. First She Wanted Bernie's Speeches... There Were None... Still Would Not Release The Transcripts!
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:58 PM
Apr 2016
Now its tax returns for transcripts...
What does she want... receipts for business lunches? It's mixing apples w/ oranges... We already know Bernie's assets and income from his financial report that every Senator or Congressman must file. So Hillary where are you going to place the "goal posts" if Bernie pulls out his W-2's and hands them to ya? Ya need to know every deduction that he's ever taken? We know that this is a quid pro quo that's why you refuse to show us the transcripts which you have sole control over. So we all are of the opinion that you have had more than enough time to.."look into it." So what if we don't believe a word you say... right
?

Wait and see how THAT works out for ya... hmmm?
 

timlot

(456 posts)
4. Well Damn, That setup was pretty hostile.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:07 PM
Apr 2016

She should have to said, "Just a minute, let me go them out the car". Then left.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
11. I used the title from the youtube video...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:14 PM
Apr 2016

It isn't my opinion. I think she just sounds her typical way; Spews a word salad to shock and awe people into forgetting what she was supposed to be talking about in the first place.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
6. Deflect. . . she NEVER answers the questions asked.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:10 PM
Apr 2016

And she kept harping on "same standard" well, Bernie released his transcripts. Isn't that the standard they were talking about? Bernie released his transcript.
So she changed the subject.
And that answer explains this graph. Hillary has the LEAST trustworthiness of ALL candidates.


JudyM

(29,251 posts)
15. The short version of her answer: no, because there's a "double standard."
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:26 PM
Apr 2016

Playing her usual victim card.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
16. You have to admit, she is very skilled at playing the victim card, she practices a lot
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:26 PM
Apr 2016

Especially as a way to avoid answering a question. I have never once heard her give a straight answer to a straight question, she appears to always tap dance around, play various cards, change the subject, all without giving a straight answer.

Usually she doesn't answer the actual question at all, the rare times she does she answers in vague lawyer speak that leaves so much wiggle room to change the answer to mean almost anything she wants later on.

I prefer straight talk to lawyer speak or refusal to do anything other than dance around, until no one even remembers the question, let alone notices that she never answered it.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
17. She cannot show us how transparent she is,
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:28 PM
Apr 2016

if she keeps on deflecting and digressing.

So, let's say Bernie's tax returns come in,
(I doubt that anything serious can be found
there, but who knows)
then will she give out the transcripts?
I don't think so.

 
20. I hope Bernie brings it up in the debate
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:37 PM
Apr 2016

He should have his people call the R candidates and get their pledge to release any transcripts from paid speeches they gave, if any. Then announce that on the stage to call her out and force their release!

 

DemocracyDirect

(708 posts)
22. I bet Trump does exactly that if she is the nominee.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

I'm sure the RNC has the sound bites from one of her speeches all ready to go.

Scary stuff.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
27. He can't do it until Jane releases the tax returns.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:03 PM
Apr 2016

Really. That's a problem and I don't know why the Sanders don't just get it out of the way.

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
26. I didn't care for her tone there, kind of "fussy" like she felt picked on, bullied.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:02 PM
Apr 2016

From the other room it sounded like an adolescent griping about having to do something and petulantly refusing unless all the other kids in school have to do it, too.

Or was it just me?

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
30. She must be getting very tired of the peasants questioning her right to the throne...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:09 PM
Apr 2016

There will be consequences and repercussions...

Funtatlaguy

(10,878 posts)
31. Have any other candidates been paid for Wall Street speeches?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:12 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie hasn't done any.
Have Trump, Cruz, or Kasich?

 

Arizona Roadrunner

(168 posts)
32. Can a tax payer sue Clinton for release of speeches?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:13 PM
Apr 2016

Can a tax payer sue Clinton for release of those speeches to Goldman-Sachs? If Goldman-Sachs tax deducted those speeches as an "expense", then it would be interesting to find out if a regular taxpayer has "standing" to sue. This would be based on the "regular" taxpayer paying more in taxes or getting less in services because of the lost revenue to the government due to the $675,000 tax deduction.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
39. Absolutely pathetic
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:51 PM
Apr 2016

I wish they would have tried to pin her down by saying, "OK, so are you saying that when Bernie Sanders releases his last 8 years of income tax returns, you will then release the transcripts of your paid corporate speeches?" Of course she would have moved the goalposts again.

But I'm glad to see one journalist finally pound her on the issue.

2cannan

(344 posts)
40. Hillary made some weird comment on MTP last week challenging others to release their emails
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:45 PM
Apr 2016

as she has done. It was so strange almost as if she had mixed up "emails" with "transcripts". And she made it sound as if she is the one who decided to release her emails (as if she wasn't required to) and that others should have to release their emails too! Huh?

snip

Clinton’s emails

Clinton repeated her acknowledgment that her use of a private email server was a mistake, along with her assertion that all of her work-related correspondence was sent using government-operated email servers, which would mean that all of those emails should be sitting in government files somewhere.

In any event, she said, all of her emails have been released.

"I think that anybody who's actually looked at this has concluded that I have now put out all of my emails," she said. "Go and ask others for their emails. Ask everybody else who's in public office. I'm the one who's done it, and I did it because I thought it was the right thing to do."

--------------------
Fact-checking Hillary Clinton on Meet the Press
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/apr/03/fact-checking-hillary-clinton-meet-press/

bbgrunt

(5,281 posts)
41. oh, for fucks sake! Poor little put upon victim. Her lies and
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 12:01 AM
Apr 2016

evasions are way past wearing thin.....so thin, THEY have become transparent

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Angrily Defends P...