2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMort Zuckerman, Owner NYDN, Huge HRC Donor: On Obama and the Iran Treaty: Unforgivable Betrayal
Obama's Unforgivable Betrayal
snip
Obama deliberately wrote off the inconvenient view of the country that is most endangered, Israel. He accommodated radical Islamist theocrats when he should have insisted on the opposite, that the survival of Israel is non-negotiable. In effect, he betrayed the trust of the Jewish state. And it is not just Israel that opposes Obamas deal. The Arab leaders, especially our closest friends, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, have made clear they share Israels view.
Linda Chavez asks whether any of our allies even trust our word any longer? Why should they when the president failed to live up to promises, for example, to stop Russian aggression in Ukraine, or to keep the murderous Assad regime from killing Syrian civilians. The Iranian deal is more capitulation to those who threaten U.S. national security. Iran will even get an immediate economic boost when we lift sanctions, which will strengthen a regime that is already ascendant as a regional power.
Editorial cartoon on Iran nuclear deal
See Photos
Political Cartoons on Iran
Obama has regularly tried to oversell Americans on this issue. When he became president, Iran had thousands of centrifuges which now would be cut down to around 6,000. In fact, according to the New York Post, in 2008 Iran only had 800 centrifuges. It was on Obamas watch, and because of his perceived weakness, that Iran accelerated its nuclear program. Then, the president asserted that all of Irans paths to developing a nuclear arsenal would be blocked. Yet, he still acknowledged what is now the common perception that Iran might still be able to build a bomb in just a year.
The president offers false choices between something like this deal and U.S. involvement in another ground war in the Middle East. Why does he not acknowledge the third choice is to force Iran to behave: wider sanctions, diplomatic action and proximity pressures to force Iran to abide by six U.N. resolutions?
In fact, to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons capability, the U.S. must impose the most stringent possible limits on Irans ability to produce fissile material. It means permitting Iran only a civilian nuclear power program without enrichment facilities or capabilities. This must be joined with a strict and comprehensive inspection regime underpinned by credible and concrete promises to punish noncompliance. Such a deal must extend as long as the U.S. and its partners believe Iran retains its nuclear weapons ambition, which will threaten its neighbors, and remains the unsettling force in the Middle East.
But none of Irans nuclear facilities, including the Fordow center will be closed, as The Washington Post noted. Not one of the countrys 19,000 centrifuges will be dismantled. Tehrans existing pile of enriched uranium will be reduced but not necessarily shipped out of the country. In effect, then, Irans nuclear infrastructure will remain intact even though some of it will be mothballed for 10 years. But when the accord lapses the Islamic Republic will instantly become a threshold nuclear state.
Most upsetting is that even with much greater restriction the deal would not be permanent but instead one or more sunset clauses whereby all limits would ultimately be lifted.
snip
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2015/04/17/obamas-iran-nuclear-deal-is-an-unforgivable-betrayal-of-israel
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)demmiblue
(36,854 posts)On Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:38 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hey, Morty. How about YOU go die in the war you want and leave everyone else alone?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1701011
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Advocating for the death of anyone on DU is NOT acceptable. Very ugly. Please hide.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:44 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seems to be referring to public figure Mort Zuckerman. If he's a member of DU he is still in public.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Obviously rhetorical.
No hide.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)People die, that's what happens. And that's what this tool wants. Fuck him. Let him go to war if he wants to.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)So nice that he can spew his propaganda so easily--by writing columns and featuring them in publications that he owns.
The guys isn't above using his media ownership to denigrate and tear down his political opponents. Here he did it to Obama. He did it to Bernie with the New York Daily News Editorial Board meeting. That was a horrendous, disgusting and unfair smear of Bernie.
The Clinton Propaganda Machine leveraged the smears from the New York Daily News to smear Bernie non stop this week.
First, the Clinton Propaganda Machine declares their strategy to defeat Bernie on Tuesday night, "Disqualify, Defeat and Unify." Then, on Wednesday, the spend the entire day parlaying that set-up smear interview into talking points that unfairly disparage Bernie.
Manufactured bullshit from Clinton and her pals.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)dogman
(6,073 posts)She says she has PBO's back or is she done in the South for now?