2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas anybody seen a transcript of Hillary's interview with the NY Daily News Editorial Board?
If so, could you post a link? I can't find it. I have found 3 relatively short articles but they said they talked with her for 80 minutes. They had Bernie's full transcript out immediately. At least one of the Hillary articles was put online 18 hours ago. There is even a link to Bernie's transcript in one the Hillary articles, but no mention of hers.
If they put a transcript out for Bernie they will do the same for Hillary, won't they? I want to get out my fine toothed comb and go through it.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But what I really want to hear is the audio.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)By not releasing it immediately like they did with Bernie's, they are further demonstrating that their interview with Bernie was a hit organized in cooperation with the Clinton campaign.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)I just looked and didn't find one. I would appreciate if you posted it.
I did find a link to audio of the meeting which I believe is the entire thing. It is about halfway down the article at this link, at "Hillary Clinton talks terrorism.....:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-blasts-obama-anti-terror-funding-cut-article-1.2594716
I would rather read the transcript, which won't take nearly the 80 minutes she met with them for, and it is easier to read something a couple of times than to back the audio up.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)I sent mine to customer service. If we don't find it posted soon, we should cc every email address on the page
http://www.nydailynews.com/services/contact-us
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)The NY Daily News is owned by Mort Zuckerman, an Republican and part of the Establishment disease that is present in both parties. Any transcripts from their Editorial Board are most likely being reviewed and edited by the Clinton Communications team before their final release. Any article about Clinton and the interview will be a glowing PR piece.
He donated $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
The hyperkinetic Clintons tend to work on their vacations, squeezing in fund-raisers for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation. In 2013, Mr. Patricof hosted a high-dollar gala at the Topping Rose House in Bridgehampton. Guests included Mortimer B. Zuckerman, the publisher of The Daily News, and the real estate executive Peter S. Kalikow, who each donated $25,000.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/21/style/hillary-clinton-hamptons-vacation.html
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)But if you're going to pretend to be a real newspaper, if you put a transcript out for one candidate you've got to do it for the other one as well.
According to one of their columnists, Hillary enjoyed herself so much that she stayed 80 minutes, longer than had been planned. And the columnist said she didn't say a lot that was substantive, mainly just stuck to her talking points. Based on that, I'm guessing they weren't quite as adversarial with her as they were with Bernie.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)mooseprime
(474 posts)don't use the words 'hillary' and 'transcript' in the same paragraph.
nuff said.
amborin
(16,631 posts)Hillary Clinton tells Daily News editorial board Trump is paid more for big-bank speeches, says shell release transcripts if he does
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Thanks for the effort. I'm looking for the entire transcript of their interview with Hillary. They had one released so quickly on Bernie that I had read it before the first of the negative spin from the Clinton campaign and the press started.
amborin
(16,631 posts)Did we learn much from Hillary Clinton's sitdown with the Daily News? Yes, and no.
She came, she saw, and she tried to conquer.
Hillary, I mean. Us hard-ass Newsers, I mean.
Hillary Clinton, who is the third presidential candidate to face a grilling by the Editorial Board of the Daily News, came for her turn on the hotseat Saturday and overstayed.
Not her welcome, but Clinton didnt want to leave because she was enjoying herself so she stayed longer than she was supposed to, while still managing to stick to her talking points.
DELEGATE TRACKER: 2016 ELECTION
For the most part, the perfectly coiffed and groomed candidate (as opposed to Bernie who has his suits custom-rumpled and hasnt combed any of his six hairs in 60 years) showed herself to be certainly less forthcoming than the other candidates whove dropped by Bernie and John Kasich and as totally well informed as you expect her to be.
Did we learn anything we didnt already know? No. Did we see her in a way we havent before? No. Did that matter? Yes. And no.
Hillary is a perfectly well-oiled machine in public, but is much more charming in person in small one-on-one settings. Where does she stand?
Israel? Yes. Further settlement expansion? No.
Jobs? Yes. Why then was there a big decline in upstate New York jobs during and since her time as senator, even as jobs increased elsewhere in the country?
HILLARY CLINTON: 1994 CRIME BILL LED TO MASS INCARCERATION
The great recession, job losses to the south and overseas, she said, but didnt, say, mention the estimated one million American jobs lost since the passage of NAFTA under her hubby President Bill Clintons administration.
Too big to fail? Yes. And no.
Hillary told us that she has great faith in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, passed in 2010 to help protect us from another Great Recession.
Hillary didnt mention the 1990 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act under President Clinton, which had been passed in 1933 to protect us from another Great Depression. Its repeal has often been cited as one of the big reasons for the Big Recession. Oh.
Free College? Yes. And no.
Hillary said that public college tuition should be based on affordability and family income. The feds and hopefully the states would make up the difference in what students can afford with grants not loans. Students would be required to work ten hours a week at the colleges to repay the grants.
That racist super predators remark, and the much hated Clinton crime bill? Yes, but not really.
CLINTON, SANDERS FIGHT FOR UNION SUPPORT BEFORE DEM. PRIMARY
I used it. Once. And never again, Hillary told us. She did not forget to mention that people such as the Rev. Al Sharpton stood up for the crime bill and how 30 years before Bill took office there were three police officers for every felony and by the time he got elected it was down to one cop for every three felonies.
Sincerity? Yes. And No. Competentance? Yes.
Did Hillary conquer? Yes. And no. She came, she left, and so did I headed for the Board of Elections to cast my absentee ballot. Will I vote for Hillary?
I still dont know. What I do know is that, come November, she might be all that stands between us and all
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)NY Daily News asks a mild question that is not directed at Hillary's record, Hillary talks 5 minutes. Little substance. They were firing questions, including gotcha questions, at Bernie faster than anybody could answer them.
Pretty much like the rest of the MSM on dealing with Bernie versus dealing with Hillary.
amborin
(16,631 posts)I think this is it:
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2016/01/22/79203982/
jfern
(5,204 posts)She would be fucking destroyed.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)He never said a word. Hillary directed a comment at him and said his name at around the 65 minute mark.
I would guess the guy who asked the questions of Hillary in such a soft and friendly manner (relative to Bernie) knows that Mort and Hillary are friends.
Mort was never referenced in Bernie's interview, don't know if he was there or not.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)The government prosecutors were outresourced, the laws were insufficient, some of the cases would take such a long time that the statute of limitations would be an issue, etc.
She said she had talked to prosecutors and wasn't going to second guess anybody on that and the laws need to be looked at.
So the banksters are not just too big to fail, they are too complex to jail, in 2008 and still today. And she thinks we need to study the problem but doesn't advocate breaking up the large financial institutions to reduce their power.
She talked about about how it wasn't just the too big to fail banks that were the problem, it was also institutions like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG and Lehman Brothers (and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley which she didn't mention). When Bernie is talking about the too big to fail financial institutions it's clear he is talking about more than just the commercial banks given that Goldman Sachs (an investment bank) is always in the conversation. Citigroup and Bank of America are very big into commercial and investment banking. Hillary was talking as if a clear line could still be drawn between them. Glass-Steagall wiped that out, as she well knows. I thought that was a big attempted deflection on her part.
On hedge funds: she said "we don't even know what kind of risks they impose", they need to be looked at. A hedge fund called Long Term Capital Management collapsed during the Clinton administration and due to the enormous leverage it employed, it posed a systemic risk to Wall Street. There were emergency meetings conducted by the Fed with all the major banks (many of whom were creditors of LTCM) as how to liquidate LTCM without incurring a market crash. (There is a very good book on that called "When Genius Failed", by Roger Lowenstein.)
So we're almost 20 years past Long Term Capital Management, 8 years since the financial crash of 2008, and we still don't understand what all these institutions do, what the rules are, and how to prosecute them.
Umbral18
(105 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Her excuses for why there were no prosecutions of Wall Street and her comment that we really don't know what kinds of systemic risks hedge funds might cause currently were the worst things I heard.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)Zira
(1,054 posts)She addresses the 1% and is running on their money. She will only say what they want and it will be in their favor not ours.
I saw a copy of her speaking engagement agreement on a news site and it includes that she can't be recorded in any form and no parts of the speeches may be shared.
This is because she thinks she would lose her supporters if it was shared. But, I disagree. NO amount of her corruption would lose the people who support her, or they would have already left.