Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:04 PM Apr 2016

If Hillary takes the nomination and is then indicted, can the Party replace her?

Would the Party replace her or leave her on the ticket as she continues to deal with the looming email server issues/investigation/whatever?

An indictment would be a terrible October Surprise and almost certainly see that Raphael Cruz becomes President.

I know, concern is noted, blah blah, but you cannot say that there's no way that this could ever happen.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Hillary takes the nomination and is then indicted, can the Party replace her? (Original Post) NightWatcher Apr 2016 OP
Best to just not nominate her. Fawke Em Apr 2016 #1
Because it's her turn dammit. She's been owed this since the 90's NightWatcher Apr 2016 #3
Yeah! PyaarRevolution Apr 2016 #7
The corporate media refuses to address it. So people assume that there is nothing to it. RDANGELO Apr 2016 #11
If my car is swallowed by a flying whale, whose insurance pays for it -- mine or the whale's? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #2
Flying whale = never happen. Hillary being investigated = happening as we speak NightWatcher Apr 2016 #4
I see. And this arrest that was supposed "very soon" for the past six months... Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #5
Any arrest is like 10 steps further down the road. She'll be pardoned, first, but she has to agree leveymg Apr 2016 #8
Hillary won't be indicted. Indictments, like taxes, are for the little people. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2016 #18
There is no point in trying to have a rational discussions giftedgirl77 Apr 2016 #12
Not even close to the same NWCorona Apr 2016 #15
The party must have some kind of procedure in place The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2016 #6
The Convention Rules Committee can make any changes it wants. leveymg Apr 2016 #9
My bigger question is would they do it, or leave her in? NightWatcher Apr 2016 #13
The DNC is keeping Joe Biden in the wings to take over awake Apr 2016 #10
no chance. bernie and hillary are the choices. nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #17
When did the DNC stop trying to get Bernie out of the race? awake Apr 2016 #22
oh, they might try. restorefreedom Apr 2016 #23
I would like to think so, but when this year has DWS ever cared what the people think awake Apr 2016 #24
she might care about her primary opponent. i am sure she cares nothing for us. nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #25
If, however unlikely, this were to happen...the party would NEVER choose Sanders. anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #14
I'd think that this would help usher in a third party, from the left. That's ok by me. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #16
It would actually be fine by me as well...as long as it was lead by someone young enough to anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #31
Oh man, talk about a weak candidate with a POed and discouraged electorate Fumesucker Apr 2016 #20
I was just thinking the same thing about the Sanders supporters. It would be so much easier anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #32
"Obviously, they are a bit upset at how things have progressed." senz Apr 2016 #34
"Can"? or "Will"? lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #19
It's goood to be the King Fumesucker Apr 2016 #21
Her VP pick will be next in line is my guess. FarPoint Apr 2016 #26
Ha ha! Vermont! Good one! Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #29
it wont happen MFM008 Apr 2016 #27
Nightmare scenario Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #28
With The DLC, BLue Dog Third Way running the PArty? Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #30
Bernie would need to make the condition for his endorsement RDANGELO Apr 2016 #33
She won't be indicted. fun n serious Apr 2016 #35

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
1. Best to just not nominate her.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:05 PM
Apr 2016

For the life of me, I can't understand why people are voting for someone under a criminal investigation by the FBI.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
7. Yeah!
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:12 PM
Apr 2016

She'll get the nomination, leave the POTUS, sell a book and increase her speaking fees after it. After all, that's why I think Hillary wants to become POTUS
After this, we'll never see her again until Hillary pushes her daughter or grand-daughter to run and the stupid MSM will perpetuate a stupid meme that they're the second coming of the Kennedys(complete load of crap).

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
11. The corporate media refuses to address it. So people assume that there is nothing to it.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:17 PM
Apr 2016

They don't care, as long as there are two corporate politicians with the party nominations. They win either way.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
5. I see. And this arrest that was supposed "very soon" for the past six months...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:09 PM
Apr 2016

FAIL!!!

Christ -- this is Sanders's Benghazi.

What a clown.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
8. Any arrest is like 10 steps further down the road. She'll be pardoned, first, but she has to agree
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:14 PM
Apr 2016

to certain conditions before she gets Obama to lift a pen on her behalf.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
12. There is no point in trying to have a rational discussions
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:18 PM
Apr 2016

with these individuals. Either they just make shit up or bring in sludge from the far right.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,714 posts)
6. The party must have some kind of procedure in place
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:11 PM
Apr 2016

for the possibility that its nominee might be unable to proceed to the GE for any reason (death, illness, incapacity, etc.), because obviously it would be impossible to re-do the primaries. My guess is that the delegates would be asked to re-vote, but I don't know if that's what they would actually have to do.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
13. My bigger question is would they do it, or leave her in?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:19 PM
Apr 2016

She's shown via Debbie W Schultz that she controls the Party and I doubt she'd step aside for the good of the Party/country in order to maintain her play for the office she's wanted since the 90's.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
23. oh, they might try.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:45 PM
Apr 2016

but the blowback will be something like they have never seen, and since many of them are elected officials who want to keep their jobs, they will have to go to bernie.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
14. If, however unlikely, this were to happen...the party would NEVER choose Sanders.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:19 PM
Apr 2016

They don't consider him a loyal member of the party. As I've said before, I was able to talk with one of my senators while visiting DC on visit with my college poli sci group...and she said that they are going to work on changing the DNC rules to require any presidential candidate who wants to run as a Dem to have been a member of the Democratic party for a certain number of years before declaring. Obviously, they are a bit upset at how things have progressed.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
31. It would actually be fine by me as well...as long as it was lead by someone young enough to
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:18 PM
Apr 2016

see through the change that is necessary. The new party also needs to have clear, substantial working plans for how it is going to push for change in the current system. This type of revolution has to be much more inclusive, and far better organized, with concrete nuts and bolts, in order to succeed.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. Oh man, talk about a weak candidate with a POed and discouraged electorate
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:31 PM
Apr 2016

I still don't think the Dem party wants to win a landslide and particularly with a left populist like Bernie.

It's like watching the surface of a shark tank, there's all kinds of gruesome stuff going on down there you'd just as soon not have to think about but then you find yourself staring into the water.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
32. I was just thinking the same thing about the Sanders supporters. It would be so much easier
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:19 PM
Apr 2016

to jump on the bandwagon if they were nice and welcoming.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
34. "Obviously, they are a bit upset at how things have progressed."
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 06:15 PM
Apr 2016

Are they? How do you know? What is wrong with how "things have progressed"?

It is obvious that Bernie's values, principles, policies and issue stands are classically Democratic. What is there for them to object to?

As far as being "disloyal to the party," Bernie has voted and caucused for decades with the Democrats. They know him, they know he is honest and reliable. Where is the perceived "disloyalty" in that?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
19. "Can"? or "Will"?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:30 PM
Apr 2016

Of course they could, but this party is owned by the Clintons personally. It's their machine to do with as they will, as are all her supporters.

They're not here in service to us. We're here in service to them.

FarPoint

(12,406 posts)
26. Her VP pick will be next in line is my guess.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:01 PM
Apr 2016

Just so you know, Sanders will be in Vermont... Watching on the TV.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
28. Nightmare scenario
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:06 PM
Apr 2016

My guess is that Biden would probably parachute in like batman, but I really have no idea.

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
33. Bernie would need to make the condition for his endorsement
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:24 PM
Apr 2016

That if Hillary if forced to drop out , then he gets the nomination. I would also fight for a check off on the VP selection.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
35. She won't be indicted.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 06:17 PM
Apr 2016

If something were to happen to her, I would like to see Biden come in. Anyone but Bernie.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Hillary takes the nomi...