2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary hasn't won anything in one month- if this were a sports team how would the media cover it?
Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2016, 02:42 PM - Edit history (2)
How do you suppose the media would react to the favored team losing every single match for one month?
The media would say the team was in free fall.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)artyteacher
(598 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)because if the refs cant hand them the games then at end the league will give it to them regardless.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Bernie has closed the gap slightly in 3Q.
And Hillary will close out the win in the final quarter.
That's the correct analogy.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)when the referee is the president of your fan club.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... blame the refs.
tritsofme
(17,378 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Have you ever seen a video of the full game between the Buffalo Bills and the Houston Oilers, the playoff game that took place on January 3, 1993?
It's totally amazing. I'd been aware of the outcome ever since it happened, and then a few years ago some ESPN station that I then got on cable played the full game. It skipped all the timeouts and commercials, so it ran the full hour and then overtime part, but no longer. I must say, that even knowing how it was going to turn out it is the most amazing game ever. It's worth watching not matter which candidate you prefer this year.
And I wouldn't carry this particular football analogy any farther, because whoever the Republican nominee is, he won't be the Dallas Cowboys.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)bigtree
(85,996 posts)...with Hillary winning comfortable margins in the popular vote and in earned delegates.
They'd also point to the rest of the schedule which favors Hillary.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Why no one on her side is too worried: 250 pledged delegate advantage. Also, 2.4M more votes than Sanders. There's also the fact that he hasn't won any closed primaries yet and a few of them are coming up that favor her.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2016, 03:12 PM - Edit history (1)
When a team loses 8 in a row there are very serious issues.
Hillary won the first half the season, but then she lost for one month straight. Even though she banked enough wins to make it to the playoffs, you don't think there would be a major disaster in the media, and with the team?
There is no way to spin this, but the media isn't honest with anyone about the fact that she lost over and over for a long time periods.
Losing for an entire month, doesn't bode well for the future.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)toss around while they cheer on their favorite team player oblivious to those the game affects the most the lower and working classes that they are blind to. They cheer from their places of relative comfort or even luxury.
for us footballs, that are not living comfortably, I assure you, this is no game and that is why we so desperately want a political revolution, rather than more of the same which plunges us further and deeper into poverty, while adding to our impoverished numbers with the same old neo-liberal policies that condemn more and more middle class people to this Hell of poverty we live in and already call home.
They make many assumptions from ivory towers of middle class or wealth with little awareness it would seem of those that are lower middle class (quickly falling into poverty even tho they work harder with multiple McJobs than they did before lower middle class meant poverty).
As to the poor - they seem completely oblivious to them and convince themselves that welfare reform didn't harm anybody, I know Hill and Bill believe this, but it did and does to this day I assure you, it was not a pragmatic solution to a "welfare queen" problem handled well because a Democrat helped to all but destroy it. It will not be a brave pragmatic solution to "earned benefit queens" they will likely label SS beneficiaries, as they collude yet again with republicans to begin to shred these last vestiges of the new deal and great society.
They cause the poor to become poorer still while so many in the party applaud the politicians responsible. Their applause and support are what make them just as responsible as their political idols.
They think this is a game, or a sport with my team and their team, not realizing or caring that the ball that is tossed around in this sport is a child that only gets to eat at school and will soon lose that food, or the ball is an elderly widow or widower that can only afford to take their medicine every other day or maybe will freeze to death in a small flat during a winter they could not pay their gas bill (this happens ALREADY where I live).
There are many other balls tossed around for their sport and amusement, too many to list them all here, some are dead or dying, some are living under a tarp in a vacant lot hoping the cops don't roust them or the suburban teenagers don't decide to slum it and amuse themselves by assaulting them while laughing and taunting the "bum" for cell phone footage. Some of these comfortable people give advice to "the poor that in fact do OK" as a famous DLC Democrat once said. One of the Conservative DU posters once even suggested dumpster diving as a viable and reasonable option.
Too many of them applaud policies and politicians that make all these problems worse, they need to get it through their heads, many are dying and more will die of poverty, this is no game and the poor aren't doing OK, they are doing worse all the time with less help available all the time.
artislife
(9,497 posts)and they should fire the coach.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)and well clear of the relegation zone.
Oh, you meant that other football. Nevermind.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)MineralMan
(146,313 posts)Nothing like it. Sorry, but the analogy fails on all counts.