2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Iraqis were given the greatest gift, the gift of freedom" --Hillary
"The Iraqis were given the greatest gift that one human can give to another human -the gift of freedom"
Hillary Clinton, 2008
Is this as important as the visit to the Vatican, voters?
Autumn
(45,097 posts)and who you trust should be the lesson learned here. But not.
Broward
(1,976 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2008
"Around the world we have to restore American leadership and our moral authority and that begins by ending the war in Iraq and bringing our troops home," Clinton said, per ABC News' Eloise Harper. "I know that we can starting within 60 days have a plan to begin responsibly and safely withdrawing our young men and women.
"And I believe that at the same time that we have to make clear to the Iraqis that they have been given the greatest gift that a human being can give another human being the gift of freedom. And it is up to them to decide how they will use that precious gift that has been paid for with the blood and sacrifice and treasure of the United States of America."
Clearly, she's saying it was a mistake, but Iraqis should make the best of their current situation since you can't go back. It's a hard truth after george war bush invaded and occupied an innocent nation, but the truth none-the-less in 2008.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)In fact, my late wife worked knew some Iraqis who had an engineering firm here. She talked to them right after george war bush invaded Iraq and asked their opinion. They said, "bush has unleashed hundreds of Saddams and we will never be able to go return to our country."
panader0
(25,816 posts)does that mean Iraqis are now free?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)That's a shame.
I think her statement was pretty clear, don't lose this opportunity. Unfortunately, they did. It was probably inevitable. I think Iraqis weakness and absence of a viable military was probably one reason george war bush chose them. The irony is that if they had nukes or a viable military, we probably would not have invaded them.
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)Context or not, she is still characterizing our invasion & occupation of Iraq as giving the gift of freedom to Iraqis.
Nevertheless they are just words, political rhetoric. Actions and policies are what matters most, though words can be revealing.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)the best of the situation and use their relative "freedom" wisely. It's not a flippant, oh you are so lucky hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis have been killed kind of thing, as you guys are trying to make it. But I don't expect you to stop.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)But hey, look at the bright side, your new home and family will be that much better.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Do you think that makes it better?
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)I don't see the words "awful mistake" in the full quote. The closest she comes to implying what you interpret as the meaning is "restore American leadership and our moral authority" -- but that doesn't change the meaning of "give" and "gift" and "freedom."
I think it's accurate to conclude in this context the "gift" of "freedom" is something the Iraqis did not have under Saddam Hussein. How then was this "gift" bestowed, and who was the giver of the gift?
Furthermore, if it's such a precious gift, why was giving it such an awful mistake?
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Playing both sides, as the full quote demonstrates.
Paragraph one is all dovey and then the hawk swoops in, in paragraph two.
rgbecker
(4,831 posts)One thing you can say about the Clintons: They are career politicians, good at it and making millions doing it.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)She actually did not vote to blow their country apart, nor did Kerry or a lot of other good Democrats. She voted to give george war bush the leverage he, and many others, thought he needed to force weapons inspections.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)shrub was going to war and anybody that thought they were voting otherwise is lying or deluded.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)All these people are saying they knew it back then, but I've not seen very many who can prove they are anything but Monday morning quarterbacks. I think most people at the time thought the resolution would be used as intended to force Saddam to give weapons inspectors what they needed to either certify there were no WMDs, or identify them and put Iraq under sanctions and inspection until they were eliminated.
I agreed with Carter as Powell was set to go to the UN: "The solution, Carter added, is "a sustained and enlarged inspection team, deployed as a permanent entity until the United States and other members of the U.N. Security Council determine that its presence is no longer needed."
rgbecker
(4,831 posts)They couldn't find any WMDs, not because they couldn't do their searches, but because, as we soon verified, there were none.
Bush had the perfect plan, unstoppable by the simple rule: You can't prove a negative.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/weapons-inspectors-leave-iraq/
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Really???????
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)That is what Democrats like Kerry voted for.
We need to clear our of Iraq so that we have plenty of troops and freedom bombs to bring "freedom" to other countries, like Libya, Syria, Honduras, Iran, and a whole NeoCon Warmongering list of other countries that need our kind of help (indiscriminate murder from the skies).
Those Latin American countries voting in democratically elected governments need to be taught a lesson about American Style Freedom too. They have been getting a little uppity, and setting a very bad example for the World by providing services and a safety net for the poorest of their people. Are you listening, Venezuela?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)squeamish, so post a warning if you decide to go there.
Mika
(17,751 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)BTW, exactly how free is Iraq if all of Sharia Law is incorporated by reference into the Iraqi Constitution, courtesy of Bushco? Or are we talking freedom for only hetero male Iraqis?
Okay, this is well beyond tone deaf American Exceptionalism.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Those corporations then donated HUGE sums of money to the corrupt Clinton Foundation.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I guess so
Being freed from their mortal lives. Not something I would be proud of if I were a Hill Shill though.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I guess "Let freedom reign" was already taken.
Typical neocon bullshit. That's Hillary.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Are we judging Presidential candidates bases on things of import or idiotic trivia?
jfern
(5,204 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I don't remember some groundswell of requests coming from Iraq that we invade their country.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Go figure.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But what kind of a person SAYS that kind of shit?
Oh wait, I know. People like Dick Cheney, Donal Rumsfeld...and Hillary Clinton.
How can anyone even read that statement and vote for her?