Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,239 posts)
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:44 PM Apr 2016

Bernie--so not ready for Prime Time in NYC:

It is a short--about 3 minute summary of Bernies Failed NYDN interview.







0:03 / 1:59
Reactions to Bernie Sanders' NYDN Interview






Reactions to Bernie Sanders' NYDN Interview



&ebc=ANyPxKrh-RFXYNLXxorpAa6VeRrO4ii5kq8b-aVCFEts-OuUdHkZT5hycdgjnjbOjX1QaPi4ZcCLU1enOSmqw6EY8odN7V-TzQ&nohtml5=False

Published on Apr 6, 2016

Bernie Sanders is “taking some heat” for his interview with the editorial board of the New York Daily News, where he showed “deficiencies on policy areas,” including trade, breaking up the big banks, and foreign policy and gave the “wrong answer” on gun manufacturers. As one pundit said, “these answers are just not acceptable at this stage in the campaign.”

Watch this video to see just some of the reactions to Sanders’ interview that has posed the question “does he really have a plan to follow through with what he talks about?” He “doesn’t have depth” on the issues and it was even called an “embarrassment.”



14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
2. Good thing the NYTimes disproved this and proved Bernie right
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:54 PM
Apr 2016

and the fault was the interviewers.

But you don't really care since this is a duplicate post do you?

robbedvoter

(28,290 posts)
5. NYT gave him a do over?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:43 PM
Apr 2016

Funny, because you take spin over transcript. But, het, it's the NYT! They are only wrong when it's Krugman

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
10. Do you have a specific part of that transcript that you think proves your point?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:30 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary supporters keep saying that he flubbed the interview, but they never give specific examples.

Anyone who actually read the interview and checks the facts on the issues, comes away with a far different view.

So here's a challenge: specific examples from the interview

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
3. Still sprewing this discredited bullshit, I see.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:57 PM
Apr 2016

Kinda like your candidate: still pushing that discredited, Wall-Street-humping bullshit.

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
4. Hillary is ready for prime time
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:18 PM
Apr 2016

She's a great actress. She can pretend to be so many things she isn't. Some deluded people even think that the Goldwater Girl and Walmart anti-worker warrior cares about working people.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
6. In contrast, experts debunking (published by WaPo, NYTimes, and Roosevelt Inst).
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:15 PM
Apr 2016
Let’s Dispel Once and for All With This Fiction That Sanders Doesn’t Know How to Break Up Banks
04.05.16
Mike Konczal is a Fellow with the Roosevelt Institute

http://rooseveltinstitute.org/sanders-ending-tbtf/

==================================

Why Bernie Sanders knows more about big banks than his critics are saying
By Max Ehrenfreund
April 7 at 1:50 PM

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/04/07/bernie-sanders-has-a-plan-to-break-up-the-big-banks/

================================

Yes, Bernie Sanders Knows Something About Breaking Up Banks
By Peter Eavis
New York Times
APRIL 5, 2016

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/upshot/yes-bernie-sanders-knows-something-about-breaking-up-banks.html

---------------------------------------------------------
In addition, transcript error puts word in Bernie's mouth

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511676187

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
9. Forests and Trees. Once again the pundits and Clinton campaign IGNORE the forest
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:28 AM
Apr 2016

Getting all in a tizzy because Sanders "ummmed" and didn't have minuate at hand, while TOTALLY MARGINALIZING the larger point.

he's not ready for prime time if you cponsider prime time the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.

I'd sure rather a candidate who point out the things below and will hire and consult with people to work on the details.



http://m.nydailynews.com/opinion/transcript-bernie-sanders-meets-news-editorial-board-article-1.2588306

Daily News: ....in your speech you mention the financial industry and you focused on corporate America, the greed of Wall Street and corporate America. So I wanted to get a sense of corporate America, as the agent of American destruction.

Sanders: General Electric, good example. General Electric was created in this country by American workers and American consumers. What we have seen over the many years is shutting down of many major plants in this country. Sending jobs to low-wage countries. And General Electric, doing a very good job avoiding the taxes. In fact, in a given year, they pay nothing in taxes. That's greed.

That is greed and that’s selfishness. That is lack of respect for the people of this country.

Daily News: And so how does that destroy the fabric of America?

Sanders: I'll tell you how it does. If you are a corporation and the only damn thing you are concerned about is your profits. Let's just give an example of a corporation that's making money in America, today, but desiring to move to China or to Mexico to make even more money. That is destroying the moral fabric of this country. That is saying that I don't care that the workers, here have worked for decades. It doesn't matter to me. The only thing that matters is that I can make a little bit more money. That the dollar is all that is almighty. And I think that is the moral fabric.

To me, what moral is, I've got to be concerned about you. You've got to be concerned about my wife. That's moral to me. That's what I believe in. And if the only thing that matters to you is making an extra buck, you don't care about my family, I think that's immoral. And I think what corporate America has shown us in the last number of years, what Wall Street has shown us, the only thing that matters is their profits and their money. And the hell with the rest of the people of this country.


Daily News: Okay. Do you weigh in the balance at all, the fact that a company that's moving jobs overseas, that the competitive climate may be such that they feel that they must, to compete in the United States?

Sanders: No. I think, firstly, we have to appreciate these guys wrote the rules in the first place. So they wrote the trade agreements. And then, yes, I do understand you can make more profits by paying people in Mexico, or China, or Vietnam pennies an hour, I do understand that. But I believe that people have...and, by the way, I'm not anti-trade. We live in a global economy, we need trade. But the trade policies that we have allowed to occur, that were written by corporate America have been disastrous for American workers.

So I think we need trade. But I think it should be based on fair trade policies. No, I don't think it is appropriate for trade policies to say that you can move to a country where wages are abysmal, where there are no environmental regulations, where workers can't form unions. That's not the kind of trade agreement that I will support.


-------------------
Daily News: At what point in history, in the recent history of the United States, do you think the balance began to tip against the American worker?

Sanders: In the early '70s. I think it was in the late '60s/early '70s. I think Lyndon Johnson's, maybe even earlier than that, the victory over Goldwater, in '64 got the ruling class in this country very nervous.

And I think there became a very organized effort, on the part of corporate America, and very powerful forces, to say, "Look, we are in trouble. And we're going to have to fight back." And I think what you have seen in a number of ways, trade being one way, attacks on trade unions being another way, to really reestablish and strengthen the power of the few against the many.


Daily News: And do you trace all of that, do you ascribe, are those the forces in your mind that have led to wage stagnation since then?

Sanders: I think there's been a very concerted effort to take on trade unions. No question about that. You're seeing that every day, or in the last few years, in Wisconsin, what the governor there, Scott Walker, is about. That is a perfect metaphor for what I think corporate America...much, I'm not going to say all of, but much of corporate America has wanted to privatize everything that can be privatized. To destroy trade unions. To make it harder for people to get health care. To give tax breaks to the very wealthiest people in this country. Yeah, I think that has been a very concerted effort.

 

fighting-irish

(75 posts)
14. You still spew propaganda
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:17 AM
Apr 2016

when this was clearly debunked by the NY Times?

Nice to know that Clinton supporters are so arrogant in their defense of Clinton that they don't realize they are LOSING supporters by the second.

I wonder why Bernie doesn't have to fundraise in some private house all the time - I know! He's got the supporters, the organization, the groundwork, the people ready to vote for him.

You said it's been a month since the Clinton's last win? She might have to wait another few more months longer or never.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie--so not ready for ...