HRC is set to be interviewed “within weeks” as part of an FBI investigation

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/world_news/Americas/article1686228.ece?CMP=OTH-gnws-standard-2016_04_09

HILLARY CLINTON is set to be interviewed “within weeks” as part of an FBI investigation into whether national security was compromised by her use of a privately owned email server while she was US secretary of state, according to congressional sources.

Controversy over Clinton’s deliberate choice to use the unsecured server, based in her home, to host a private email address used for government business has dogged her campaign.

The frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination is fighting off rival Bernie Sanders and contemplating facing Donald Trump or Ted Cruz in November but Republicans now view her toughest opponent as James Comey, the FBI director.

The FBI vultures are circling the wagon...

[revbones]

1. Hopefully the truth will come out soon. nt

[JoePhilly]

2. ANY SECOND!!!!!

[JTFrog]

4. Hey, they loves them some Murdoch wishful thinking! N/T

[Avalux]

3. Obama won't interfere.

I'm glad he said that - he won't do anything to help Hillary if it doesn't go well for her.

[pdsimdars]

17. He already has interfered. By going out in the public as he has a few times now on TV

and saying he didn't think she had compromised national security, that is what interfering looks like. He's sending a message.

[FlatBaroque]

21. He has already prejudiced the investigation.

It was a terrible thing to do, but I believe he is being pressured by his funders, who are so heavily invested in a President Clinton.

[Skink]

5. Hopefully it will be on you tube

I don't have cable

[Fumesucker]

7. If Clinton runs true to form it will be on pay-per-view

[RDANGELO]

6. I think it is this week.

When the candidates were negotiating for the NY debate, the Sanders campaign stipulated that they were willing to debate any time from the 10th to the 13th. The Clinton campaign would not give in on any of those dates. They agreed to the 14th after De blasio stepped in and helped Bernie change the date on an event.

[IdaBriggs]

8. Obama: Clinton Didn't "Intentionally" Put America in Jeopardy

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/04/10/obama_clinton_didnt_intentionally_put_america_in_jeopardy_i_guarantee_no_political_influence_in_server_probe.html

"I can guarantee," Obama promised. "I can guarantee that not because I give Attorney General [Loretta] Lynch a directive, that is institutionally how we have always operated. I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line and always have maintained it."

"I guarantee it. I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case but in any case. Period," Obama made clear.

"Nobody gets treated differently when it comes to the Justice Department because nobody is above the law," the president added.

I believe the toast is burning.

[MineralMan]

9. According to what FBI source? Or is this another

"unnamed source close to the investigation" thing again. "within weeks?" There are 52 weeks in a year. This is another typical insinuation that Clinton is about to be "indicted by the FBI." Nonsense and wishful thinking, I believe.

[thesquanderer]

10. the article says "according to congressional sources."

There appears to be more detail to follow, but you can't read the entire article without subscribing. The last freely readable sentence says

The final phase of the FBI investigation is understood to involve interviewing Clinton and four former State Department aides. “The expectation is that within weeks [she] will be asked by the FBI to raise her hand and swear to tell the truth,” said a congressional

Yes, of course, there are 52 weeks in a year, and infinite weeks in eternity, but realistically, if someone says something is expected within weeks, one would expect it to be under a month, two at the most (after which, it would be more logical to say "within months&quot .

As far as I can tell, there is NO assertion made that the article includes any suggestion that she is about to be indicted.

I think it is reasonable to believe that the FBI wants to talk to her, and she has said that she is willing to talk to them (as if she really has a choice). So I think that much is simply a matter of when.

IMO, the sooner the better. Get the whole thing behind her, one way or the other. We don't need anything creating such distraction in the general campaign, or after she's elected.

[MineralMan]

11. In other words, another unnamed source.

Congressional? Could be any damned right wing congressman's aid. Why does anyone pay attention to any of that crap?

[Barack_America]

12. Ah, so this explains why Obama (weakly) defended her today.

To head off this headline.

[DCBob]

13. Good.. she will handle this much like she did with Benghazi.

The sooner this is over with the better.

[JudyM]

14. Except that it is much clearer in this case that she was at fault. Whether it rises to the level of

criminality we will have to wait to find out.

[DCBob]

16. Well "at fault" for accidentally sending "classified" emails.

Its my understanding the mishandling of classified information is quite common at her level. As SOS she has to deal with classified data all the time and often in urgent situations. There are times that they may not always strictly adhere to protocol. I think that's the nature of the job. Nothing illegal in that at all.

[aspirant]

19. Where did your "understanding" come from?

Do you have specific names or just "unnamed sources"

[DCBob]

20. I read alot and have read this several times from reliable informed sources.

[aspirant]

22. Names please and read Mineral Man's posts #9 and #11

[DCBob]

23. Here are a few..

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/02/01/experts-push-back-against-right-wing-media-clai/208297

[nc4bo]

15. This needs to be git gone before we reach the point of no return.

While we still have a choice.

Get 'er done one way or the other.

[pdsimdars]

18. There are some very informative videos on youtube

You can find out a lot about the issue. It is clear she committed crimes. But the question is, will they prosecute her?
You have to get away from pundits and their "opinions" and listen to people from the intelligence community and it is clear, this is SERIOUS.