Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
99 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Jimmy Carter going under the Limousine today? (Original Post) GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 OP
The Pope and now Carter- GREAT endorsements! CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #1
The Pope has endorsed Bernie? MineralMan Apr 2016 #4
There won't be a link because it hasn't happened and wont happen. stevenleser Apr 2016 #83
And this is exactly why there have been post after post clarifying Sheepshank Apr 2016 #9
*sigh* The Pope did NOT endorse Sanders Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #80
The pope's aide invited him GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #90
Exactly. I think it's naïve to think that a major figure visiting would not need Papal clearance. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #91
Wrong. seaglass Apr 2016 #92
I don't trust Washington Post... Find a non-biased source and I'll consider it. GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #93
I don't play fetch. If you are interested in truth instead of boosting your candidate you can seaglass Apr 2016 #94
I did and Reuters did not say what Washington Post did. Something is fishy about that. nt GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #95
How about the English translated Italian wire service ANSA? seaglass Apr 2016 #97
Suffice it to say Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #99
No, he's not. MineralMan Apr 2016 #2
I don't think the talking points have been coordinated yet Fumesucker Apr 2016 #3
I'm very fond of Jimmy Carter. MineralMan Apr 2016 #6
Earned it? I thought free speech was a right. You make it sound like a privilege. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #24
As a former President, he has earned the right to MineralMan Apr 2016 #27
So has his view of Hillary Clinton's foreign policy affected your views on Hillary? GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #32
No, it has not. But thanks for asking. MineralMan Apr 2016 #58
We will know the moment the new snarking point memo comes out though. QC Apr 2016 #13
Carter is big medicine yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #76
Why not show or provide a link, where he is being thrown under the bus. Sheepshank Apr 2016 #5
Yet. bahrbearian Apr 2016 #7
Go ahead book mark this thread and post a link when you finally see anything on DU Nt Sheepshank Apr 2016 #11
Here you go GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #39
lol Hiraeth Apr 2016 #66
I'm asking not declaring... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #10
Making up shit and predicting the future based on DU dislike for Cornel West... Sheepshank Apr 2016 #14
Well I am not aware Cornel West was disliked before this primary... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #22
The Pope has endorsed nobody, and will not. MineralMan Apr 2016 #63
He knew Bernie was running for president... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #77
For the last time, the Pope did not invite Sanders. MineralMan Apr 2016 #78
The Pope is like the CEO of the Vatican... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #81
"...under the Limousine..." CrispyQ Apr 2016 #8
Jimmy Carter is more than welcome to weigh in on the primary race as far as I am concerned, Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #12
Well that's refreshing. senz Apr 2016 #84
You think my OP was hidden because of vomit or because Hillary's own words are sickening? Bonobo Apr 2016 #15
She said that? GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #16
Look it up. She sure as hell did and my Op was hidden. Bonobo Apr 2016 #18
I was on the jury. SamKnause Apr 2016 #21
I didn't know your OP was hidden and am sorry. senz Apr 2016 #85
Good for Carter! Hillary is a known neocon war and regime change kind of leader. think Apr 2016 #17
Yes, why would we give her a chance to muck things up even worse? senz Apr 2016 #86
Yes take advice from the guy that got steamrolled by Reagan Gomez163 Apr 2016 #19
There were variables beyond his control in that election... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Gomez163 Apr 2016 #23
wow Hiraeth Apr 2016 #26
I'm guessing if they were alive then that they voted for Reagan. ForgoTheConsequence Apr 2016 #28
takes some nerve. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #29
Yes support a guy who just criticized the last two Dems to get reelected. Gomez163 Apr 2016 #33
Hitler didn't appreciate criticism either. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #36
Carter had 65 senators 300 congresspeople and he still couldnt Gomez163 Apr 2016 #47
that was then. this is now. do try to keep up, dear. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #49
The subject is Carter, which was THEN. Do try to follow the thread. Gomez163 Apr 2016 #50
sounds like Carter has always been under your bus. why so upset about it now? Hiraeth Apr 2016 #57
Because he is criticizing better people. Gomez163 Apr 2016 #60
his betters. how royal of you. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #64
No. Better people. Better at winning elections. Gomez163 Apr 2016 #68
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Hiraeth Apr 2016 #69
Better than winning elections? Seeinghope Apr 2016 #98
Actually, the subject is Hillary Clinton. senz Apr 2016 #71
Criticism of people and criticism of policy are different things. senz Apr 2016 #87
the Democrat. Gomez163 Apr 2016 #30
cool story, bro. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #34
congratulations. you just made the prediction upthread come true. Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author rbrnmw Apr 2016 #72
In regards his criticism of Obama and Hillary dsc Apr 2016 #25
Hillary's not looking for peace in the I/P mess. She's besties w war criminal Netanyahu riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #31
And why he didnt have more helicopters for that rescue mission?? Gomez163 Apr 2016 #35
Carter didn't plan the mission, genius. tabasco Apr 2016 #40
No he micromanaged it. He himself Gomez163 Apr 2016 #45
That's a right-wing lie tabasco Apr 2016 #53
He even micromanaged the tennis courts. Keep your abuse to yourself Gomez163 Apr 2016 #59
wouldn't that be the Military's fault? Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #41
And they accuse us Sanders supporters of parroting RW talking points GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #42
Im still pissed at him Gomez163 Apr 2016 #43
how old were you at the time? Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #44
22 Gomez163 Apr 2016 #46
I was eleven then. I voted for Carter in our class election probably cause Grandpa Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #51
Carter used it too Gomez163 Apr 2016 #48
wrong. he actually added one right before Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #52
Nope said it in an interview years later Gomez163 Apr 2016 #55
so, the quote from his book doesn't count? please link to that quote you claim exists Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #61
Here ya go sparky Gomez163 Apr 2016 #62
That seems to have quieted things down Gomez163 Apr 2016 #70
Uh-oh. Make room under the bus for another good and decent pacifist and humanitarian Doctor_J Apr 2016 #37
What am I missing here? SheilaT Apr 2016 #54
Sorry... It means speaking the truth (Spilling the truth) GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #56
Actually, Carter evolved on the issue. blm Apr 2016 #65
CNN...Carter??? Where, when? How short our memories are. Jitter65 Apr 2016 #67
Today. Time website. Carter said Hillary as SOS did very little to bring about peace. senz Apr 2016 #73
Thanks for posting the link... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #75
I've learned to do the obvious -- senz Apr 2016 #82
So what? HRC did not invest heavily in the Hortensis Apr 2016 #88
Nonsense. HRC pushed Obama into the Libyan disaster senz Apr 2016 #89
Sorry, beedle Apr 2016 #74
Anyone who speaks against The Chosen One Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #79
He will be ignored by Hillary supporters for sure Kalidurga Apr 2016 #96
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
83. There won't be a link because it hasn't happened and wont happen.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:29 PM
Apr 2016

Zero chance the pope endorses in this election or most any election globally.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
9. And this is exactly why there have been post after post clarifying
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:50 AM
Apr 2016

...That the POPE Is not behind the invite...because people like you immediately jump to the wrong conclusion and then are starry eyed and dishonest enough to put it in writing.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
80. *sigh* The Pope did NOT endorse Sanders
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:13 PM
Apr 2016

He is attending a conference at the Vatican at the invitation of a senior Vatican official.

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
91. Exactly. I think it's naïve to think that a major figure visiting would not need Papal clearance.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:24 PM
Apr 2016

And so, by my count, we now have three great endorsements:

The Pope, President Carter, and President Obama, with all of these being implied endorsements as they are not figures whom would be expected to make explicit endorsements but by their statements or actions, or lack thereof, strongly imply a preference!

Four major figures.... On deck, the Dalai Lama?

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
94. I don't play fetch. If you are interested in truth instead of boosting your candidate you can
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:44 PM
Apr 2016

always use google.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
97. How about the English translated Italian wire service ANSA?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 06:57 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.ansa.it/english/news/vatican/2016/04/08/bernie-sanders-to-pope-conference_9ebdb599-8f62-4e92-9863-e4670359f6d0.html

(ANSA) - New York, April 8 - White House hopeful Bernie Sanders said Friday he will be attending a conference in the Vatican next week chaired by Pope Francis.
Vatican Spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said no meeting between Sanders and Francis had been currently scheduled.
He said the Democratic candidate had been invited not by the the pope but by the Pontifical Academy of Social Scviences to the Centesimus Annus (100th year) forum along with other political, social and economic personalities.


Look the reporting on this was and is horrible. You can believe what you want to believe.
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
99. Suffice it to say
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 09:53 PM
Apr 2016

the Pope may have been aware of it, and if he was, he probably approved.

Those points are, however, irrelevant.

But what IS relevant is that "approving" of him being invited is NOT the same as "endorsing" Sander's views.

Look, he's my choice, and only choice in this race. That said, we have to live in the real world where words have actual meaning, or we are no better than those we oppose.

MineralMan

(146,315 posts)
2. No, he's not.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:46 AM
Apr 2016

He's more than welcome to speak his mind, as far as I'm concerned. And, if Hillary becomes the nominee, President Carter will endorse her. So will Bernie Sanders. Some things are more important than duking it out during a primary campaign.

Truly they are.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
3. I don't think the talking points have been coordinated yet
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:46 AM
Apr 2016

This one is a toughie, quite a bit of liberal voting public is fond of Carter.

MineralMan

(146,315 posts)
6. I'm very fond of Jimmy Carter.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:48 AM
Apr 2016

He's speaking his mind. Good for him. After the convention, he'll be endorsing the nominee, too. It's hardly a single-issue primary campaign. President Carter should speak as he chooses to speak. He's earned it.

MineralMan

(146,315 posts)
27. As a former President, he has earned the right to
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:36 PM
Apr 2016

comment on primary candidates and to be heard. Of course anyone can say anything they wish. One can, however, earn the right to be heard when one speaks. Jimmy Carter has certainly earned that. But you knew what I meant, anyhow.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
32. So has his view of Hillary Clinton's foreign policy affected your views on Hillary?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:44 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:34 PM - Edit history (1)

Do you now believe everyone here who was calling her a Neocon Warhawk?

QC

(26,371 posts)
13. We will know the moment the new snarking point memo comes out though.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:55 AM
Apr 2016

You never have to wait along around here.

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
76. Carter is big medicine
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 03:02 PM
Apr 2016

Real Dems (yes, I recall what the party used to be) recall him well, and fondly

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
5. Why not show or provide a link, where he is being thrown under the bus.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:46 AM
Apr 2016

I've yet to see anything of the sort on DU.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
10. I'm asking not declaring...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:51 AM
Apr 2016

I have seen what happened to Cornel West, Stan Lee, and Nina Turner for starters

It seems when someone high profile flips to Bernie, Clinton people turn on that surrogate.

Same thing with the pope all weekend they've been attacking Vaticangate, so I'm expecting the same about Jimmy Carter.


Carter has an amazing museum here to the east of downtown Atlanta along Freedom Parkway. It is the perfect tribute to a man dedicated to peace and justice

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
14. Making up shit and predicting the future based on DU dislike for Cornel West...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:56 AM
Apr 2016

..... Vs an overwhelming affection for Carter is completely disingenious for making a false prediction.

Why not wait for an actual action before deriding it, rather than assuming. Oh wait never mind, it's important to insult a Hillary supporter even before they have done anything, to create a false narrative.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
22. Well I am not aware Cornel West was disliked before this primary...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:20 PM
Apr 2016

But I did see Nina Turner being belittled rudely in the Hillary Clinton group. What did Nina Turner do to deserve that? Nina is a passionate strong woman who stood with her morality and changed her endorsement to Senator Sanders!

And the Pope has been attacked here ever since he endorsed Sanders too.

MineralMan

(146,315 posts)
63. The Pope has endorsed nobody, and will not.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:37 PM
Apr 2016

Where did you get the idea that he had endorsed Bernie Sanders, anyway?

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
77. He knew Bernie was running for president...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

And yet he invited Bernie to his convention. I think it is an implicit endorsement of Sanders

MineralMan

(146,315 posts)
78. For the last time, the Pope did not invite Sanders.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 03:11 PM
Apr 2016

Do you know how many conferences are held by the Vatican? There is no endorsement of a Democratic Candidate for the nomination being issued by the Pope, implicit or explicit. The Pope never endorses political candidates and is not about to start now.

You keep saying that Bernie was invited by the Pope. That is simply not true. I wish you would stop claiming that it is.

It's nice that Bernie will attend this conference. Good for him. But it's not at the request of the Pope, for pete's sake.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
81. The Pope is like the CEO of the Vatican...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:16 PM
Apr 2016

To act like he is ignorant of what goes on in his organization is an over simplification

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
12. Jimmy Carter is more than welcome to weigh in on the primary race as far as I am concerned,
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:54 AM
Apr 2016

and to share his opinion as to who would be the better president.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
15. You think my OP was hidden because of vomit or because Hillary's own words are sickening?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:57 AM
Apr 2016

Is a vomit gif more disgusting than Hillary's disgusting words:

"the Iraqis were given the greatest gift that one human can give to another human -the gift of freedom"

-Hillary Clinton, 2008

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
18. Look it up. She sure as hell did and my Op was hidden.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:01 PM
Apr 2016

Maybe you would so kind as to make an OP. I think if you didn't know than perhaps many others didnt as well.

People need to and have the right to know what kind of a person she is.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
21. I was on the jury.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:19 PM
Apr 2016

I was very aware of what she said.

She is disgusting beyond belief.

I voted to leave your post.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
85. I didn't know your OP was hidden and am sorry.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:55 PM
Apr 2016

I recently had a totally bogus hide as well, but it wasn't an OP; it was a cute and friendly joke. Certain folks seem to be in a very bad mood, of late. Hopefully, whatever virtual harm they do to us is nothing compared to the electoral agony that drives their disgusting and unforgivable behavior. I didn't know a gif that is supplied by this very site for our use can now be alerted on and hidden. But of course, anything can be hidden, and we have no recourse. I am certain they alert not on the content of the comment but on resentment toward the commenter.

So let us double down to defeat the worse candidate and elect the better candidate.

And let us support one another as we make our way through sometimes icky surroundings.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
17. Good for Carter! Hillary is a known neocon war and regime change kind of leader.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:59 AM
Apr 2016

That legacy should stay with Bush and Cheney.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
86. Yes, why would we give her a chance to muck things up even worse?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:57 PM
Apr 2016

I prefer the candidate with healthy instincts and sound judgment.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
20. There were variables beyond his control in that election...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:07 PM
Apr 2016

Reagan ruined this country so please don't praise Reagan.

Response to GeorgiaPeanuts (Reply #20)

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
28. I'm guessing if they were alive then that they voted for Reagan.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:36 PM
Apr 2016

Reagan and Hillary have very similar platforms.

 

Seeinghope

(786 posts)
98. Better than winning elections?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 07:03 PM
Apr 2016

Are those the standards that you live by? Cheat, steal, lie....anything to get elected? Like your main squeeze Hillary Clinton? A woman that as Secretary of State gave arms contracts to foreign countries for billions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation. Then again as Secretary of State being involved in an uranium deal with Russia and how they received a massive amount of uranium from Wyoming while The Clinton Foundation received another hefty donation.

These are the people that you support that you say are winners. People that you admire.

Jimmy Carter spends his time building houses for poor people. Not trying to figure out how he can get richer using the American People' support. Nice set of values to feel proud of.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
87. Criticism of people and criticism of policy are different things.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:59 PM
Apr 2016

Now you just settle down and think about it.

Response to Gomez163 (Reply #23)

dsc

(52,162 posts)
25. In regards his criticism of Obama and Hillary
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:29 PM
Apr 2016

I would ask him given that Netanyahu was Israeli Prime minister for all but 2 months of Obama's presidency, just what he expected either Obama or Hillary to do in regards to peace.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
31. Hillary's not looking for peace in the I/P mess. She's besties w war criminal Netanyahu
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:43 PM
Apr 2016

And vows to host him at the White House asap if she's president.

I will do everything I can to enhance our strategic partnership and strengthen America’s security commitment to Israel, ensuring that it always has the qualitative military edge to defend itself. That includes immediately dispatching a delegation of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to meet with senior Israeli commanders. I would also invite the Israeli prime minister to the White House in my first month in office.

Read more: http://forward.com/opinion/national/324013/how-i-would-rebuild-ties-to-israel-and-benjamin-neta/#ixzz45RFApzWY


Read the entire article. Its enough to make you weep.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
40. Carter didn't plan the mission, genius.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:05 PM
Apr 2016

High-ranking officers planned the mission and Carter trusted them, just like Obama and Osama.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
41. wouldn't that be the Military's fault?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:08 PM
Apr 2016

I was young then, but i sure do remember the republicans loved using that helicopter line.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
42. And they accuse us Sanders supporters of parroting RW talking points
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:10 PM
Apr 2016

Wow, thanks for that; I wasn't born then so I didn't know that.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
51. I was eleven then. I voted for Carter in our class election probably cause Grandpa
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:24 PM
Apr 2016

used to call Reagan that 'fake cowboy' while we watched the evening news together everyday.

A few years ago I did go back and read the facts, was pleased to learn that Oompa was right all along.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
52. wrong. he actually added one right before
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:28 PM
Apr 2016

In his new book, A Full Life, Carter describes the critical decision he made in early April of 1980, as his reelection hung in the balance and “the Iranians failed to follow through with an agreement to transfer the hostages, and on April 11, I called my advisers together and we agreed to move ahead with the rescue mission. My last suggestion was that we add another helicopter, giving us two more than necessary.” But even that wasn’t enough—as the mission was launched, a helicopter crashed on takeoff, swerving into a C-130 plane, killing eight crewmen and forcing Carter to announce the so-called Desert One mission had failed.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/jimmy-carter-cancer-121563#ixzz45Rh1rZGJ
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
37. Uh-oh. Make room under the bus for another good and decent pacifist and humanitarian
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:53 PM
Apr 2016

Carter lives in a modest house in Plains, too. Doesn't appear to have been raking in quarter-million dollar stipends for telling wall street criminals what they want to hear. He's not one of us!!!!!

blm

(113,062 posts)
65. Actually, Carter evolved on the issue.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:39 PM
Apr 2016

He was not as liberal in the 60s and 70s as many now think. In fact, he governed as a conservative Dem, which is why Kennedy primaried him.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
67. CNN...Carter??? Where, when? How short our memories are.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:42 PM
Apr 2016

I love the man and respect him greatly for his social positions and work. At the same time, as no one is perfect, he made his fair share of missteps. Especially concerning the former Shah of Iran. One could say that Carter is totally responsible for the Iranian belligerence toward the west today. You know, if you go back far enough into anyone's past you can find something to not like about them. And you could blame Reagan's rise on Carter's Presidency. I am sure had Clinton preceded Reagan that would be happening now. Let's get real...we are dealing with today's candidates in today's political climate. And that is what voters should be using to weigh their decisions.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
82. I've learned to do the obvious --
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:26 PM
Apr 2016

when I don't know what's going on, I just do the old control/F on the GD-P page. I saw your OP, was intensely curious, went through my usual "why doesn't anybody ever tell me anything?" snit, then calmed down and searched on "Carter."

I seriously appreciate your creativity, liveliness, and ability to find interesting videos/web sources. You are giving this place the lightness and levity it desperately needs. You're like yeast to bread. So glad you found us. Don't ever leave, okay?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
88. So what? HRC did not invest heavily in the
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:01 PM
Apr 2016

usual Mideast peace pursuit. It's true. She was very involved in changing conditions in the middle east in other important and achievable ways. For instance, she was at the lead of planning and implementing the actions that eventually lead to the Iran nuclear deal (and that Kerry gets to have under his name).

But no magnificent peace treaties of the sort that would get whole books written about them as a legacy. President Carter thought she should do more. She and President Obama had their own ideas about how her four years would be spent.

This isn't a slam. It's the way it is.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
89. Nonsense. HRC pushed Obama into the Libyan disaster
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:10 PM
Apr 2016

damaging his presidency and then voiced serious reservations over his (not her) Iranian agreement.

Her instincts lean toward war mongering and her judgment has proven to be abysmal.

She is by no means aligned with Obama on these issues.

This isn't a slam. It's just the way it is.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
96. He will be ignored by Hillary supporters for sure
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 06:47 PM
Apr 2016

They will concentrate on minimizing Bernie's trip to the Vatican instead. And pushing the narrative that if you don't vote for Hillary you are a sexist pig even if you are a woman and vote for women even if you have a history of voting for women for president.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is Jimmy Carter going und...