2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI have my own question about Sanders' trip to Rome
Is he traveling to Rome with his own money, with campaign funds, or on the taxpayers' dine?
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)fundraising. geeze....
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)speaking in a conference hall in Buffalo. Bernie is not cancelling engagements left and right and flying around the planet to actually talk about fresh water supplies in Uganda.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)some of us held a yard sale
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)And if you were paying attention to the informative threads yesterday, you would already know....
Any of the three would be perfectly appropriate and totally legal.
Thanks for playing!
RandySF
(58,835 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)event which certainly must have cost his campaign a huge amount of money, hundreds of thousands of dollars. Did you? If not then why ask it about Bernie who is not staging a huge event but just attending a conference? What's so different about Bernie?
RandySF
(58,835 posts)And instead of just answering, a lot of energy is being expended throwing tantrums. I don't have time to browse through DU in the middle of a weekday.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Sorry if you do not like it.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,328 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,201 posts).
These OPs are getting more BASIC as the hours progress.
.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,201 posts).
All the concern about a single flight when politicians make a dozen of them in a week.
No one questions when they fly from coast to coast, but somehow there is a neurotic fixation on this flight!
.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Because they work in DC and represent districts elsewhere. They are not, however, allowed to take vacations to Italy or anywhere else on congressional funds. Nor are they allowed to use those funds for campaigning. Those laws were set up to protect taxpayers and to discourage corrupt activity. Over the years, some have broken those laws and faced penalties ranging from censure to jail. As much as you all are certain the laws of mere mortals do not apply to Bernie, as evidenced by the excuses made for the many hundreds or even a thousand plus violations of campaign finance law cited by the FEC but excused or denied by his supporters, the FEC or the courts do not share the conviction that the law exempts people you happen to admire.
Perogie
(687 posts)Hillary, why did you lie about sniper fire?
Hillary, why do you take so much money from private prison industry?
Hillary, why do you say you're a progressive in front of more liberal voters, but then say your more centrist when you're with conservative voters?
Hillary, why are you using white noise so people can't hear what you say to high dollar donors?
Hillary, why were you against gay marriage?
Hillary, why did you use a surrogate to call Obama a Muslim?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Why did you take so much money from wall street and why won't you release the transcripts?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)during their campaigns, Obama had a huge Berlin rally for example. My question is did you and the others claiming this is a legitimate question for Bernie pose that question to Obama or any of the others? If not, why not and also why now?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Um...don't expect any kind of answer real soon. If you know what I mean.
frylock
(34,825 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)One thing it wasn't financed with was fracking bribes. Don't worry because his schedule is free of big donor dinners. All good! you one percenters really crack me up!
polly7
(20,582 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)How did I miss that one?
polly7
(20,582 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)He's going to steal money from orphans!! Seriously?
Demand this much transparency from your own candidate ... where are those transcripts?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)It's a legitimate question.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)RandySF
(58,835 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)This place is getting to me.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)They get more desperate by the hour.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)That's what Democrats do now.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)What was the answer when Hillary asked that abut Obama's Berlin trip?
Another interesting question I have of my own is did you ask those questions of Obama? Or is it more of those 'special rules we can't explain that apply only to Bernie'?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)They are insufferable
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Obama spent nearly $700,000 for stage, lights in Berlin
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/31/obama-spent-nearly-700000-for-stage-lights-in-berl/?page=all
The OP sounds very much like them.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's where they stash the millions they made from drug running and selling organs on the black market.
That's why they REFUSE to release their tax returns.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)I am sure if it is official then the Senate would cover it, if not he would. He flies coach, so you are really pulling at threads on this one. How many posts are you going to spam about the trip? Maybe he will ask Hillary to give the in flight safety speech and then use the $2000 dollars she would make for a 2 minute speech to pay for it?
drray23
(7,629 posts)He may have done so before running for president. Right now he is chartering private flights during the campaign like every other candidate because its impractical to do otherwise given their schedule and security requirements.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)My exact wording was...
http://www.snopes.com/bernie-sanders-flies-coach/
He does fly coach. I did not say he is flying coach. We are all aware that the last thing the secret service or other passengers would want is the logistics of dealing with a candidate entering the plane non stop. Imagine the flack he would get for all of the delays and people missing connecting flights. My point is he is known to not splash on extravagant things, and when it came to flying he is known to fly coach. So my point is this whole notion of flygate is soooooooooooo ridiculous.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Maybe you are out shopping for a new and better dog whistle?
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Or is this just more distraction?
If not distraction. Maybe you can answer why the Clinton Foundation received donations that seemed to align with Hillary's deals as SOS?
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)but many times conference participants are given stipends or airfare or other things related to their participation.
Personally I am sure whatever he is doing - it is allowed under the law so I don't really spend any time worrying about it.
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)...but according to the program, Bernie Sanders is not.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)so what do you mean?
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:13 PM - Edit history (2)
But I saw this and it made me think of you.
This is what your team has been doing for a long time...relishing any little thing you think you can turn into a weapon against Bernie. It's pathetic.
Now, back to your red dot.
Oh, but wait, you may want to see this first:
https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Bernie-Sanders-Vatican.pdf
above pdf link from guardian article
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/08/bernie-sanders-vatican-visit-pope-francis
edited to add:
I did just find the program, and while he's not listed under the first pages showing times of events, he is listed on page 10 as one of the "other participants".
A participant, participates, they don't just "attend". I don't know how they fit the other participants in, but you cannot say he will not be speaking when he is listed as a "participant" in the event. It's probably during the open discussion periods that the "other" participants get to give a short speech...I don't know...but he's on the program.
http://www.pass.va/content/dam/scienzesociali/booklet/centesimus_annus.pdf
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)FRIDAY 15 APRIL 2016
MORNING
9:00 Word of Welcome
PASS President Professor Margaret Archer and Professor Daniel Finn
9:15 New Challenges and New Concerns since Centesimus Annus H.Em. Cardinal Oscar Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga
10:00 Paper to be discussed: Changes in the World Economy Since 1981 Author: Professor Jeffrey Sachs
The fall of the Soviet Union was the major economic backdrop of Centesimus annus. Much has occurred economically since. What are the most salient changes in global economic life and how well does the economic insight of Centesimus annus illuminate those changes? What do recent economic crises and recent changes in economic thinking suggest for the near future of economic life?
10:30 Session #1: first respondent Professor Javier Iguíñiz
10:45 Discussion
11:00 Coffee Break
11:30 Session #2: second respondent Professor Stefano Zamagni
11:45 Discussion
12:00 General Discussion
13:15 Lunch
AFTERNOON
15:00 Paper to be discussed: Changes in the World Political Situation Since 1981 Author: President Rafael Correa
The fall of the Soviet Union and the democratization of Eastern Europe was the major political backdrop of Centesimus annus. What is the global political situation today and which elements require greater attention by both the international community and by Catholic social teaching?
15:30 Session #3: first respondent Professor Rocco Buttiglione
15:45 Discussion
16:00 Coffee Break
16:30 Session #4: second respondent Professor Hsin-Chi Kuan
16:45 Discussion
17:00 General Discussion
19:15 Dinner
SATURDAY 16 APRIL 2016
MORNING
9:00 Paper to be discussed: Changes in the World Cultural Situation Since 1981 Author: Professor José Casanova
The Church is an expert on the human person, and this insight imbued the analysis of Centesimus annus. Yet the past 25 years have seen remarkable developments in culture, with the impact of the internet, the marketization of life and culture, the importance of Islam around the world, new dynamics of secularization, etc. How ought we to think about the cultural situation today and what realities call for further reflection within Catholic social thought today?
9:30 Session #5: first respondent Professor Douglas Porpora
9:45 Discussion
10:00 Coffee Break
10:30 Session #6: second respondent Professor Margaret Archer
10:45 Discussion
11:00 General Discussion
12:15 Lunch
AFTERNOON
15:00 Paper to be discussed: How Catholic Social Teaching Engages the World Situation Author: Fr. Bryan Hehir
Like Rerum novarum a hundred years earlier, CA engaged the world situation of its day. This paper will attend to how those two encyclicals engaged the world, rather than what they had to say about the world, in order to draw out impli- cations for how CST today can most helpfully engage the contemporary situation. At the authors option, one or more of the other anniversary encyclicals of Rerum novarum could be employed as well.
15:30 Session #7: first respondent Professor Pierpaolo Donati
15:45 Discussion
16:00 Coffee Break
16:30 Session #8: second respondent Professor Russell Hittinger
16:45 Discussion
EVENING
17:00 Paper to be discussed: The New Proposals Coming From Latin America Author: President Evo Morales
In the light of Pope Francis reading of the previous documents of the Magisterium, presented during the World Meeting of the Popular Movements of Santa Cruz de la Sierra in Bolivia, the author will present his proposal based on his expe- rience as a leader of the popular movements, rooted in the pre-Columbian cultural traditions and populations.
17:30 Session #9: first respondent Professor Daniel Finn
17:45 Discussion
18:00 Session #10: second respondent Professor Juan Llach
18:15 Discussion
18:30 General Discussion and Final Comments by Professor Martin Albrow
19:30 Dinner
It would appear that Jeffrey Sachs facilitated his invitation, so you'd think this would be where Sanders would appear; except he can't leave NYC before midnight, and this is at 4 AM NYC time.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)It's a PDF file and on page ten it shows Sanders as one of the "other" participants.
Your program info is not complete. Please look at my link and re-read my post.
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)There five papers being presented (one by Sachs). For each, there are two formal responses, and then open discussion. I'm sure Sanders will have a chance to participate in the discussion (I wouldn't describe that as "speaking", since the time for discussion is limited to 15 minute chunks, but in any event, he won't be at the economic change session on Friday, because it's physically impossible for him to make it to Rome before 1 PM.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)does not mean he won't be allowed to speak during the discussion periods. And it's possible the "other" participants (not attendees) will each be giving a small speech at those opportunities.
I've never seen one of these conventions so I don't know quite how they work. Have you?
If he was just an audience member, he would not be listed as a "participant".
From the link I gave you to the announcement, it says:
We're delighted to host this conference to celebrate the 25th anniversary of Centesimus Annus, bringing together world leaders, including US Senator Sanders, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa, Bolivian President Evo Morales, Academicians of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences such as its President Margaret Archer, and leading scholars such as Professor Daniel Finn, Professor Jeffrey Sachs etc., to examine and discuss changes in politics, economics, and culture in the world these last 25 years
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)EVERYONE is invited and is a "participant". And they can participate in the discussion session, but 15 minutes (TOTAL, not per person) doesn't give Sanders significant time for a speech, especially if other "participants" want to comment.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You are not involved in the communications between the Academy, and Sanders, or Sanders and his advisor who is one of the main speakers. He's even been given a topic to address, and he thinks he's giving a speech. Where would he get that idea if it didn't come from his friend/advisor, or the Academy directly?
Why are you being so rigid and obtuse? why are you so determined to call him a liar, when you really don't know the first thing about what is going on?
You know what they say about making assumptions?
I'm sure you do.
dr60omg
(283 posts)The Bolivian and Ecuadorian president are not scheduled .... your point is? Oh yes you have no point you do not understand conferences like this
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)...what will Sanders do at the conference and how will it benefit his campaign? Because if this is just a distraction, that tell's me something about his focus on the activity he chose to engage in.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)To make it. And besides he is speaking.
okasha
(11,573 posts)a University, for instance--are usually provided with travel expenses, hotel fees and a per diem for meals. (Been there, done that lots of times.)
Sanders is not representing an organization, so I assume he would pay his own expenses.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Producing corporate and non corporate events. What you said is ridiculous.
okasha
(11,573 posts)and helped to organize, scholarly conferences, I can testify that that is exactly how it works in academia. And that's exactly what this meeting that Sanders is going to, is--an academic seminar.
I have no idea how your corporate events work, nor are they pertinent to the conference in question.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)in the post you first responded to.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)Where Tad Devine and Jeff Weaver sit, I do NOT want to know.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)pat_k
(9,313 posts)JI7
(89,250 posts)the bitter resentful tone that this person(sanders/michelle) is wrongly taking something away from them. and the condescending demands for answers .
2banon
(7,321 posts)but couldn't find any.. did I miss that by any chance?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)This is assuredly NOT your original thought. All the howler monkeys have been repeating it nonstop. So don't try to add insult to injury by lying to me....mmmmkay, Randy?
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)I have my own question about Sanders' trip to Rome
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511694534
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Is Skinner still the owner of Democratic Underground? Inquiring minds "need to know."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:29 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This issue has been beaten to death. Enough!
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I am in Canada, our opinion does not count
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: What the hell kind of frivolous alert is this? Quit wasting our time, Alerter!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Why would anyone alert on this?
I'm a Sanders supporter and I think it's a perfectly valid question.
I'm almost positive none of us would know the answer but it isn't alert material.
And, for the record, I would gladly contribute to his travel costs.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
840high
(17,196 posts)trip - we will donate very, very quickly.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Obama of course went full tilt and did a massive public event in Berlin. And who questioned that? The right wing. Today you fill the shoes of the Washington Times and El Rushbaugh. Good for you.
RandySF
(58,835 posts)All one had to do was answer and that's the end of it.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)None of this is paramount to taking two days to visit the Vatican the week of the primary.
If New York was solidly locked up in his favor, I wouldn't have concerns over his absence in New York during this period.
However, I personally feel that this is a poor decision by the campaign.
Just my .02
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...on a wave of Hillary supporters' tears.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Has the Democratic party cratered morally to the extent that we *don't* want a Senator to attend a conference on economic justice?
I don't think it has, but I do think that anybody that cheers this on has lost their way.
I guess the Hillary campaign doesn't need Catholic voters anymore, either.
Who is next? Episcopalians? Presbyterians? I'm just wondering how many people you folks can insult in one day.
riversedge
(70,224 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I doubt even Hillary Clinton would go that far, but hey, maybe I'm wrong.
Autumn
(45,089 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They did the same thing when they claimed he only honeymooned in Russia because he was too cheap to pay for it, how he has Jane do the taxes because he's too cheap to hire an accountant, how he never donates to charity because he's too cheap, etc.
reddread
(6,896 posts)I always want to attribute better motivations than the obvious ones.
more fool me.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)but I didn't get why Hillary Clinton supporters were so mad about this post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511696374
I said nothing about her, or actually, his campaign, just pointed out that he shut down a bigot.
Finally, 98 posts in, I got what made them so pissed. It happened around the same time that Bill Clinton excoriated a BLM supporter, and claimed they supported 13 year olds hopped up on crack.
Compared to Bernie's response to an obvious anti-Semitic trope, that doesn't look too good for Hillary's side of the fence, does it?
I didn't realize how many asses I was chapping with that. I just thought it was a cool moment that showed how calmly he discusses issues.
Autumn
(45,089 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Now it all makes sense.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)into a fervor about how much it costs. For some reason Jenna Bush running drunk and naked down the streets in South America was not an issue for them, though.
The conservadems get a lot of their material from hate radio.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)brooklynite
(94,572 posts)If NOT, the nomination should be his top priority. Just as I would expect the General Election to be the top priority of the nominee.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)brooklynite
(94,572 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)220K miles round trip, non stop from JFK to Rome. I have 340K points on that card. I could buy his ticket and donate it to him if it is bothering people that much.
It's Flight 1041 operated by Alitalia. It is an 8 hour 35 minute flight and there are plenty of seats on all flights later this week.
brooklynite
(94,572 posts)...Sanders is at the debate until 11 PM on Thursday. There are NO flights to Rome later that night; and if there were, he'd still miss the morning economic session. The earliest flight on Friday is at about 4 PM, getting in early Saturday morning.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Especially through Amex. Not sure how many points I have on that card, but could check. if you are REALLY that interested.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)What time does that Alitalia flight leave JFK? The acadia seminar is on the 15th.
basselope
(2,565 posts)But there are charter flights you can get via Amex points.
RandySF
(58,835 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)amnesty should be rescinded, with accumulated time-outs to be served sequentially.