2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton employing noise machines against journalists during fundraiser in Colorado
No big deal, right?
scscholar
(2,902 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Or if she tries to prevent people from recording her high-dollar fundraiser speeches.
Frankly I wonder why we can't just get some people to pay her fee to get into one of these fundraisers and wear one of those button cameras that snap on a button on a button up shirt and just record one. I doubt they employ metal detectors at these big dollar fundraisers.
kaleckim
(651 posts)What do you mean I want to take away her first amendment rights?
scscholar
(2,902 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Or have you ever bother to actually READ the First Amendment?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)she could tell reporters to stay quiet and cut access. There is this something that you mentioned there that it also applies to the press by the way.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)and the speeches of presidential candidates?
I fully respect Hillary's right to spew white noise ... I've never complained about it before during the thousands of other speeches when she spewed it.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Are you shocked? I'm not a bit. This is coming from the woman who roped in journalists.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)But this takes this to a new level of well, paranoia. And I mean the paranoia part, Then again a certain 47 precent comment sank Romney. Did I mention those machines will also work dandy against rogue phones from pesky wait staff?
beedle
(1,235 posts)It's what the soldiers are fighting for.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I doubt they are using one you can get at your spook and stuff store
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Probably her words.