Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton employing noise machines against journalists during fundraiser in Colorado (Original Post) kaleckim Apr 2016 OP
So you want to take away her first amendment rights? scscholar Apr 2016 #1
I don't follow. How is that being proposed? morningfog Apr 2016 #2
That is the stock go to defense for demands to release transcripts... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #5
Flesh out your argument kaleckim Apr 2016 #4
So you don't believe you have the right to say what you want to say to who? scscholar Apr 2016 #7
How has the Congress interfered with here First Amendment rights? Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #10
This has butkis to do with first amendment nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #8
I'm sorry, what government agency is forbidding her from talking? Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #9
That statement is fairly Bushian. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #11
You mean the right of the press to report the news beedle Apr 2016 #13
And yet her supporters will say "so what". pinebox Apr 2016 #3
Well I understand these are supposed to be secret nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #6
Secret Presidential Campaign Speeches beedle Apr 2016 #14
I mean the white noise generators nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #15
What is she trying to hide? Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #12
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
5. That is the stock go to defense for demands to release transcripts...
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

Or if she tries to prevent people from recording her high-dollar fundraiser speeches.

Frankly I wonder why we can't just get some people to pay her fee to get into one of these fundraisers and wear one of those button cameras that snap on a button on a button up shirt and just record one. I doubt they employ metal detectors at these big dollar fundraisers.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
10. How has the Congress interfered with here First Amendment rights?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 12:20 AM
Apr 2016

Or have you ever bother to actually READ the First Amendment?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
8. This has butkis to do with first amendment
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 12:10 AM
Apr 2016

she could tell reporters to stay quiet and cut access. There is this something that you mentioned there that it also applies to the press by the way.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
13. You mean the right of the press to report the news
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 11:10 PM
Apr 2016

and the speeches of presidential candidates?

I fully respect Hillary's right to spew white noise ... I've never complained about it before during the thousands of other speeches when she spewed it.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
3. And yet her supporters will say "so what".
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 12:06 AM
Apr 2016

Are you shocked? I'm not a bit. This is coming from the woman who roped in journalists.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
6. Well I understand these are supposed to be secret
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 12:09 AM
Apr 2016

But this takes this to a new level of well, paranoia. And I mean the paranoia part, Then again a certain 47 precent comment sank Romney. Did I mention those machines will also work dandy against rogue phones from pesky wait staff?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
15. I mean the white noise generators
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 11:20 PM
Apr 2016

I doubt they are using one you can get at your spook and stuff store

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton employing noise m...