2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis Is Why You Should Just Throw Out The Results Of Pollsters Who Exclude Cell Phones
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=fded7065-4b8e-4e70-b960-a4bedb974516Obama leads by 48% among cell phone users but only 5% among land line users. That is a enormous discrepancy and no amout of weighting can correct for it, ergo:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-political-polls/2012/10/12/21408264-13de-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_story_1.html
If some DUER can do a snap shot for illustrative purposes I would appreciate it.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)So please, people, stop crying over every ppp poll.
teabaggersarestupid
(111 posts)?
LisaL
(44,974 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Whether I like the results or not.
FBaggins
(26,760 posts)Don't just throw them out... take them with that salt.
But also remember that there is little new here. The pollsters were able to adjust their models over the last couple cycles to tweak their assumptions re: cell-phone-only households. There's little reason to believe that they are substantially different from 2008/2010.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)That being said, we have to factor in the following:
1) There are a lot more cell phone only households than even two years ago
2) The number of pollsters who exclude cell phones is dwindling
3) Rasmussen didn't do a great job in 010
FBaggins
(26,760 posts)... is that Gallup does a better job than just about anyone at including cell phones (and just increased their cell-phone proportion a couple weeks ago).
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)than just 2 much less FOUR years ago. Sorry but technology turnaround is accelerating. If you're talking about old people, sure, those numbers are stable. But middle age and younger? Gotta be kidding...
FBaggins
(26,760 posts)The change between 2006-2008 is virtually the same as 2008-2010... and that's almost exactly the same as 2010-2012. The adoption growth rate has been relatively constant.
IOW, there are more people, but not something that can't be accounted for statistically.
Keep in mind that this isn't a new argument. We heard the exact same thing in 2010.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Most of the large media commissioned polls include cell phones.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)That would be very useful.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Liberalynn
(7,549 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)even if controlling for other demographics--in other words, white thirty-something's with cell only are more likely to vote for Obama than white thirty-something's with landlines.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)The gap in the Survey USA CT poll is huge. I saw a similar discrepancy in their FL poll.
I'm also suspicious of the internet trackers, even the ones that give us favorable results like yougov.
renate
(13,776 posts)I didn't realize that so many pollsters still don't, or aren't allowed to, call cell phones. Now I feel a LOT better about those weird poll numbers we've been hearing.