2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNPR FactChecker Admits "pretty much true" Hillary SuperPac Got $3.25 Mill from Fossil Fuel Industry
NPRs factchecker acknowledges that its pretty much true that the main superPAC backing Hillary Clinton got $3.25 million from donors associated with fossil fuels.
FAIR.org readers took action in response to Did Sanders Lie About Clintons Oil Money? NPR Factchecker Cant Be Bothered to Check (4/1/16). They got a response from NPR ombud Elizabeth Jensen (4/5/16) and a do-over from NPR factchecker Peter Overby (4/6/16)but NPRs coverage still leaves a lot to be desired in terms of forthrightly addressing the issue of fossil-fuel funding in the Democratic presidential race.
http://fair.org/home/fair-activists-get-two-responses-from-npr-on-fossil-fuel-funding-controversy/
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)As long as they're going to be corporate radio, let the corporations pay for it.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)i like some of the not "news" shows - it is all that is left of what was a long time ago something good
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)her campaign. Believe me, the FEC would be all over that...like the TWO actions they have against Bernie's campaign right now.
amborin
(16,631 posts)Politifact: Hillary Did Get Money From the Fossil Fuel Industry
According to the latest tallies from Center for Responsive Politics, Clinton's campaign has received $307,561 from people who work for oil and gas interests so far in the presidential race
Super PACs supporting Clinton have directly given an additional $25,701. Sanders does not have a super PAC.
But in Clintons case, that doesn't include "bundlers," a fancy name for fundraisers who collect money from individual donors and bundle the money together for a campaign.
The Huffington Post article from July 17, 2015, cited by Sanders found that "nearly all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clintons campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry." It links to 40 registered lobbyists but only offers details on some donors who still work for the industry.
However, the Greenpeace report says that when you add in the bundlers donations (lobbyists with some alleged tie to the fossil fuel industry), Clinton's total rises to nearly $1.8 million.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/apr/01/sorting-out-clintons-fossil-fuel-contributions/
Hillary Clinton is getting a lot of money from fossil fuel executives and lobbyists acting as bundlers (fundraisers who collect donations) who represent fossil fuel companies. (She also has lobbyist bundlers who represent other environmentally challenged corporations like Monsanto.)
Heres just a partial list of the fossil fuelfriendly bundlers who raised money for Clinton from April through June:
ExxonMobil executive Theresa Mary Fariello raised $21,200. ExxonMobil is the worlds largest oil and gas company, and it has a particularly ugly history of funding climate change denial. It is also eager to exploit oil reserves in delicate regions such as the Arctic, despite its responsibility for the most devastating Arctic oil spill in history.
Brian Wolff, executive vice president at the Edison Electric Institute, a utility company trade association, came up with $26,600. EEI opposes and lobbies against the EPAs Clean Power Plan to limit CO2 emissions from power plants, the centerpiece of President Obamas Climate Action Plan. The power-plant regulations are essential for the U.S. to meet its emission-reduction targets under the Copenhagen Accord and to live up to the promises it is laying out in advance of U.N. negotiations in Paris this December. Clinton has pledged to protect the Clean Power Plan regulations.
Heather Podesta and Tony Podesta have raised $31,150 and $74,575, respectively. The power ex-couple are big-shot Democratic lobbyists. Tonys brother John is Clintons campaign chair and former White House chief of staff to Bill Clinton. Even though John Podesta is considered a climate hawk, Tony and his ex-wife Heather represent fossil fuel companies. Heathers recent past clients include Marathon Oil and Bill Kochs Oxbow Carbon, a coal giant, and from 2004 to 2006 she lobbied for Koch Industries.
Tony lobbied for BP in the wake of its disastrous Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion, and through last year he represented Golden Pass, a company co-owned by ExxonMobil and Qatar Petroleum that wants to export liquefied natural gas. To be fair, they also work on behalf of renewable fuel companies Tony represents SolarReserve, a solar power company, and Heather lobbies for the ethanol industry. You might call the Podestas the very embodiment of the Obama/Clinton all of the above energy policy.
Scott Parven and Brian Pomper, lobbyists for Chevron, bundled $24,700 and $29,700 for Clinton, respectively. Their work includes opposing the Clean Power Plan controls that Clinton supports, and protecting the tax breaks for oil companies that Clinton has previously called for eliminating.
One of Hillarys top fundraisers, Gordon Giffin, is a former lobbyist for TransCanada, the company pushing to build the Keystone XL pipeline.
Thats just a sampling. As the Huffington Post reports, Nearly all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clintons campaign
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)Ms. Clinton enjoys a lot of the measures that prevent disclosure to the FEC.
But that Fossil Fuel money is still there, coordinating with her campaign but barely skirting around the law.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)TMontoya
(369 posts)Are not part of the campaign. They are independent and the candidate can not have any contact with them. So how can Hillary be accepting funds to a SuperPac she has no control over?
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)St Aug girl
(29 posts)That her campaign allows to coordinate since they only advocate in social media. Run by Brooks I believe. Stories available on other DU threads.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)So, Bernie gets 6 out of 4 Pinocchio's?