2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumStep aside Obama: Hillary Clinton tells Pennsylvania workers she’ll stand up to cheating China
The eastern US state, where organized labor is an influential force, hosts its presidential primaries on April 26.
China illegally dumps cheap products in our markets, steals our trade secrets, plays games with their currency, gives unfair advantages to state-owned-enterprises and discriminates against American companies, she said.
We will throw the book at China for their illegal actions.
.
.
Ive gone toe to toe with Chinas top leaders on some of the toughest issues we face, from cyber attacks to human rights to climate change to trade and more, she said.
I know how they operate, and they know if Im president, theyre going to have to toe the line, because were going to once and for all get fair treatment, or theyre not going to get access to our markets.
At one point she refered to China as the biggest abuser of global trade.
.
DebbieCDC
(2,543 posts)And shake their fingers at China
Oh they will "toe the line" when Herself is crowned. The line that leads right to the Clinton slush fund deposit window.
dr60omg
(283 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)... to make some serious donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Or give Bill some hella speaking fees.
That'll teach'em.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)she is one percent - for the one percent - all the rest is candy for the suckers
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)I hope you are just kidding. Because we still have transaction numbers and routing for the millions we funneled into you and your Husbands defense fund. I would hate them to wind up in wrong hands.
Love, Jiang Zemin
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,205 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to be a Chinese person talking.
TheBlackAdder
(28,205 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I can't convince you to find it objectionable
TheBlackAdder
(28,205 posts).
There are times when you have lucid poli-sci posts, showing promise, and others where they are just out there.
Unfortunately, the later prevails.
.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)US Corporate executives and wall street are the ones who are responsible. Them and the elected representatives who passed the laws allowing it to happen without repercussions.
They no longer care. They all got rich.
Fuck them.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)The sarcasm thingy is missing here....
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)And Hillary would be the one to carry on his legacy.
Oh wait, I'm sorry, that was a few weeks ago when she needed to say that to win the AA vote in the south. . . as soon as that was over she started disagreeing with all of his positions. My bad. I just get confused with all the reversals in her positions, I mean, with her constant, continual, opportunistic "evolution" on every issue.
pampango
(24,692 posts)which he has done relentlessly. He has not and I doubt Hillary or Bernie will act unilaterally against China or anyone else. Trump, OTOH, doesn't like international agreements much and may just go off on China.
Romney lost, and it was Romney supporters who were most supportive of the next president confronting China. Nearly two-thirds of Republicans backed getting tougher with Beijing, up 11 percentage points in just a year. Democrats, on the other hand, prioritized building stronger economic relations with China (53%) over getting tougher with China (39%). Democrats backing for confrontation was up 6 points since 2011, but it remained the minority sentiment among those in Obamas party.
Likely components of the administration's economic policy towards China:
The first will likely be more complaints about Chinese subsidies and trade practices filed with the WTO, given the presidents campaign promises and his record during his first term. Washington has been relatively successful with such cases in the past, and pursuing multilateral dispute settlements has the added advantage of avoiding a direct bilateral confrontation with China.
The second will be the pursuit of trade agreements that notably do not include China. The most important of these is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a trade agreement among a growing list of nations bordering the Pacific. It is the Obama administrations avowed aim to construct a TPP with standards so high especially rules regarding behavior by state-owned enterprises that China could never join without transforming its economic system. This stance in part reflects the fact that two-thirds (67%) of the U.S. public believe China practices unfair trade, according to a 2012 survey by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
The Obama administration is unlikely to label China a currency manipulator, which is something Mitt Romney promised he would do on his first day in office. In Obamas first term, the White House had multiple opportunities to do so and declined, even though the renminbi was weaker against the dollar than it is now.
http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/12/10/u-s-china-economic-relations-in-the-wake-of-the-u-s-election/
amborin
(16,631 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)She's gonna be reeeealy tough on her Corporate masters.
Might make em pay double for her speeches
Seriously, once she re-triangulates on TPP none of this will matter. Only perceived Corporate profits will matter.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)Sounds like we need someone else.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Anyone?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Like Saudi Arabia did.
KPN
(15,646 posts)and Hillary would have hammered Bernie for trashing Obama had he said the same thing -- as she has already done many times in her attempts to look all in for blacks.