2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMarch 10, 2008, Chicago Tribune: Clinton aide: Obama unqualified for VP
After several days of Bill and Hillary Clinton floating the idea of a joint ticket with rival Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton chief spokesman Howard Wolfson declared Monday that Clinton does not consider Obama qualified to be vice president.
The Clinton campaign had been pressing the idea of a Clinton-Obama dream ticket as a way to win over Democrats torn between the two candidates at the same time it has been aggressively questioning Obamas readiness to be commander-in-chief. That has led to questions seeking to resolve an apparent inconsistency in the possibility someone would be considered suitable to stand a heartbeat away from the presidency and yet be unprepared for the post.
Clinton Communications Director Wolfson was pressed on the point during a press conference call a few moments ago in which military advisers to the Clinton campaign again questioned Obamas readiness to be commander-in-chief.
Wolfson reaffirmed Clintons position that Obama has not demonstrated his suitability to guide the nation in an international crisis.
We do not believe at this point that Sen. Obama has passed that key commander in chief test, Wolfson said. Later, Wolfson added that what Clinton views as Obama's failure to pass that test would disqualify him as a vice presidential pick, since a vice president must be prepared to step into the presidency at a moments notice.
Sen. Clinton will not choose any candidate who has not at the time of choosing passed the national security threshold, period, Wolfson said.
http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/clinton_spokesman_declares_oba.html
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Thank you in advance.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)It was Haldeman and Ehrlichman that followed my orders after consulting with me
questionseverything
(9,656 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)This is just a bit of old, tough, dried out chum in the water, in a failing attempt to create a roiling, bloody mess.
It's all sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Out, out brief candle!!
beedle
(1,235 posts)You're welcome.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I don't even see the word "qualified" there.
Wanna try again?
beedle
(1,235 posts)so let's get all technical and very specific then.
When did Sanders unequivocally say Clinton was unqualified to be president?
frylock
(34,825 posts)Do you need to have your hand held as we guide you through that statement?
beedle
(1,235 posts)Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)was a good speech. Clinton was acknowledging this speech as one of his genuine accomplishments. She was obviously going out of her way to compliment him. Why are you twisting her words and implying she meant to somehow question his qualifications to be president?
chillfactor
(7,576 posts)would you berie people PLEASE concentrate on THIS primary rather than post blurbs from past elections from the heat of battle for 2008.....PLEASE get with it ...this is 2016....a new battle taking place NOW!
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Poor Hillary, simply awash in unqualified opponents.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)this position. Or triangulated past it. Or something like that. Reply #3 is a prefect example of this evolution in action.
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Absolutely Rovian.