2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Bernie Sanders is right, Hillary is not qualified to be a progressive President"
Sanders is Right: Clinton Not Qualified To Be a Progressive President
On 'quality control' and the Democratic Party
by Peter Bloom
April 7, 2016
Peter Bloom is a lecturer in the Department of People and Organisations at the Open University. He has published widely on issues of 21st century democracy, politics and economics in both scholarly journals and in publications including the Washington Post, The New Statesman, Roar, Open Democracy, The Conversation and Common Dreams. His book, Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Globalization, will be released next year.
Clinton has been trumpeted repeatedly for her undeniable political experience. Yet as Sanders has taken great pains to point out it is easy but dangerous to confuse being experienced for being qualified. Also required is wisdom, judgment and strong ethical principles.
It is not clear by any stretch of the imagination that Clinton is more experienced than Sanders. His success as a mayor, congressman and Senator holds up well with her resume as First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State. However, it is hard to argue that she matches up to him in terms of wisdom and principles.
Time and again from the Iraqi invasion to LGTB rights, from the free trade to the environment Sanderss judgment has revealed itself far superior to Clintons. The leak of the Panama Papers further highlighted this qualified difference between the two candidates. While Clinton as Secretary of State was negotiating a free trade agreement with Panama that would easier for the wealthy to move their money offshore, Sanders was giving a speech on the Senate floor railing against this deal as a giveaway to the rich at the expense of the majority of Americans.
The contest between Clinton and Sanders represents something far bigger than the election of the candidates themselves. It is the choice between status quo experience and progressive wisdom. To quote Robert Reich, Hillary Clinton is " the most qualified candidate for president of the political system we now have. But Bernie Sanders is the most qualified candidate to create the political system we should have, because hes leading a political movement for change."
Hillary Clinton is undeniably an extremely experienced and informed candidate. She is also a clear lesser evil than any Republican she will face. However, Sanders is right, she is not qualified to be a progressive President.
Read the complete article at: http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/04/07/sanders-right-clinton-not-qualified-be-progressive-president
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Bernie only scratched the surface.
"Hillary Clinton is undeniably an extremely experienced and informed candidate."
Her judgement stinks, and it gets Americans (ant others) killed for no damn good reason.
alterfurz
(2,474 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)If you are tired of watching family members die too young from over work and the stress of poverty or not being able to afford health care vote for Bernie.
wiltom99
(27 posts)Someone who cannot be trusted with classified information, should never be qualified to be POTUS.
#WhoopsHillary
dana_b
(11,546 posts)"Time and again from the Iraqi invasion to LGTB rights, from the free trade to the environment Sanderss judgment has revealed itself far superior to Clintons. The leak of the Panama Papers further highlighted this qualified difference between the two candidates. While Clinton as Secretary of State was negotiating a free trade agreement with Panama that would easier for the wealthy to move their money offshore, Sanders was giving a speech on the Senate floor railing against this deal as a giveaway to the rich at the expense of the majority of Americans."
She just does not have sound judgment.