2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Lied! Hillary Clinton Actually Refused to Call Him Unqualified… Three Times
by Tommy Christopher
April 7th, 2016
Democratic presidential candidate and independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has initiated a mass fainting spell among the political media by rattling off a list of reasons why he considers rival candidate and current frontrunner Hillary Clinton not qualified to be president. The attack has also galvanized Hillarys supporters, who have responded with the trending hashtag #HillarySoQualified. Unlike a lot of pundits, Im not that bothered by the charge, I love a smash-mouth campaign, and if it is indeed to be on like Donkey Kong, Hillary Clinton can handle herself.
What is a problem, though, is that Bernie Sanders launched his attack by first telling a big, fat, insane lie about Hillary. Heres the full context of Bernies remarks, but pay close attention to the first part:
She has been saying, lately, that she thinks that I am quote-unquote not qualified to be president.
As Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon noted on Twitter, Hillary never said that, but its actually worse than that. Hillary Clinton not only never said that, she actually was aggressively pressed to say that exact thing, three different times in a row, and like some kind of reverse-Apostle Peter, refused each time.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/bernie-lied-hillary-clinton-actually-refused-to-call-him-unqualified-three-times/
IMO, Sanders crossed the line. Barring some unforeseen event, Hillary will be the nominee. Her opponent has a right to run a campaign that he considers effective, but he shouldn't have tried to disqualify the woman who will in all probability face Trump in the GE.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Her weasel words aren't very presidential.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)She's the most presidential candidate in this election.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)specific policies she has done that has benefited people in need besides getting health care for children and very few other people.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Yes, I guess you could call the Clinton legacy "presidential" - but I prefer calling it "bigotry, war, and greed".
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)As if she's the most presidential candidate in this election
Crabby Abbey
(66 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)keep driving her untrustworthy ratings up. Please continue Madame Secretary.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)I provide documented video evidence while you provide your misguided opinion.
Response to Kalidurga (Reply #1)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Hillary supporters are all like nah she didn't say that. It's funny though how they can hear sexist remarks that were never said nor meant.
Response to Kalidurga (Reply #46)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)But, I guess as long as they can still post on DU life is good for them.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)And more of a habit.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)wiltom99
(27 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)She just doesn't like the backlash of it all.
By the way, as usual the comments are not so much nasty as true.
Response to Beacool (Reply #8)
imari362 This message was self-deleted by its author.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)She wasn't about to help him, but she didn't cross the line. He did. Therein lies the difference.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I believe it really is.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)candidates generally don't do that.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Bernie handed the Republicans a commercial.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)And that was entirely reasonable. What he said, OTOH, was a flat-out lie.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/sanders-clinton-not-qualified-to-be-president-221666#ixzz45BHZUdMq
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
"Now the other day, I think, Secretary Clinton appeared to be getting a little bit nervous," he began. "We have won, we have won seven out of eight of the recent primaries and caucuses. And she has been saying lately that she thinks that I am, quote unquote, not qualified to be president.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)florida08
(4,106 posts)the media did..she simply alluded to it
Clinton questions Sanders is qualified to be president
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/06/clinton-questions-whether-sanders-is-qualified-to-be-president/
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)not qualified to be President."
He accused her -- falsely -- of using those precise words.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)You are correct that she purposely avoided saying the words but it wasn't because she was doing something noble. She purposely avoided saying the words because she knew after her comments that the media would do it for her. Think about it. The only conclusion the media and Sanders could draw from her comments was that she was basically saying he was unqualified. She knew she didn't need to use the words for the attack to land. She got exactly what she wanted and she thought she left no fingerprints behind but she forgot that we've seen her in action before. We know what she was doing - the media knew what she was doing and Sanders knew what she was doing. The only people evidently who didn't know what she was doing were the Hillary supporters. It was a clumsy attempt to go after Sanders but cheer up she will go after him again and again and again.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)It's the same crap she pulled with Obama in 2008.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)Furthermore, what was he thinking to say in a rally that she wasn't qualified to be president and then give a laundry list of reasons?
He crossed the line and now the gloves are off.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)You are certainly entitled to prefer her brand of politics.
But please don't pretend you believe she is some innocent victim of a twisting of her intent and words.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)I hate to burst your bubble but this whole narrative was created by the Hillary campaign to try to bring down Sanders honesty numbers. The whole thing was planned out and put into motion after her huge loss in Wisconsin. All you have to do is view all the video that's out there of her various appearances to see it.
90% of Wisconsin Democrats Think Sanders Is Honest, Compared to Only 59% Who Think Clinton Is Honest
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-hanley/90-of-wisconsin-democrats_b_9621052.html
And it's not just Wisconsin Democrats who believe this. Hillary has a problem. A majority of voters think she isn't honest or trustworthy but they do think her opponent is. And guess what? They will still believe this after this poorly manufactured attempt to tar Bernie with the dishonesty label fails to gain traction. She's lied so much during her career that people just don't believe that she's the victim in all of this. And rightly so. This campaign tactic will hurt her not help her. I don't expect you to believe this because you are one of her supporters but focusing on this contrived narrative will only draw more attention to her problem. But please, as a Bernie supporter, keep pushing it. It gives us more of an opportunity to talk about our honest candidate.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)They mean nothing in the long run. The truth is that more people have voted for Hilary than have voted for Sanders and she will be the nominee. Sanders chose to overreact and misinterpret what she said based on a WAPO headline that was incorrect.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)that you don't care about honesty and trustworthiness polls.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)Doesn't he bear some responsibility to read the story and not just the headline?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)This legalistic parsing of words is just a longstanding Clinton "It depends on the meaning of what is is" tactic.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)She loves to take things out of context and use them against her opponents.
Just one example from the Florida debate. Twisting the complex relationship between the US and Latin America and directly implying that Sanders supports brutal dictatorships -- when she knows better. It was a vicious, knowing smear.
I just couldn't disagree more. You know, if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, you imprison people or even kill people for expressing their opinions, for expressing freedom of speech, that is not the kind of revolution of values that I ever want to see anywhere.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)not saying the guy before was great, both were bad.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Sorry, i'm missing your point.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)After I hit send I realized what a crappy post that was. I went to bed last last night, got up early this morning. It's only 9:30 at night here and I'm ready from bed. I think I will call it a night. Sorry again.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)to say something decent and straightforward, and move on. Take up specifics seperatly to sell herself.
Otherwise it devolves into this personalized back and forth over trivial parsing. That's the old politics of personal destruction.
Personally, I wish Sanders had not risen to the bait either.
But this kind of stupid shit is what has turned so many people off of politics and created an environment of cynicism and apathy, and ultimately turns the nation over to the bad guys.
beedle
(1,235 posts)Rachael Maddow (who now fawns over Hillary, said at the time it sounded like Hillary was vying to be McCain's VP)
Beacool
(30,249 posts)they would be more evenly matched. They both had a lot more political experience than Obama, who had only been a US senator for two years before he ran for president. She never called Obama unqualified to be president. Sanders just did call her unqualified and gave a list of reasons why he thought so.
A Democrat doesn't do that to the front runner in the latter part of a primary season. Then again, he's not really a Democrat.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)She habitually does what she accuses Sanders of doing. Smearing her primary opponent without thinking of what the GOP will do with it.
beedle
(1,235 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)Bernie never called Hillary unqualified.
He preceded every 'unqualified' with an 'IF' ... so, if Clinton wants to admit to the 'IF' stipulations, then sure, Sanders called Clinton 'unqualified', otherwise why does Hillary and her fans think Sanders meant 'Hillary' when he was explaining the parameters of what it means to be 'unqualified'?
"IF you steal money, you're a criminal": when you take that sentence as a personal insult, then you are a criminal! If you are not stealing money, then don't claim I called you a criminal!!!
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)To win, you have to play the game. Exactly why I don't fault Hillary for going by the standard for modern political candidates and having super-PACs. You don't bring a knife to a gunfight...
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)As a Socialist and Independent he knows how to fight and fight dirty to stay relevant and win elections. Acting above the fray was just a pretense. Well, he's stopped pretending and reverted to form.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)Bettie
(16,110 posts)but made it very clear that she believes that.
If she wanted to shut it down, she would have said "Of course he's qualified, I just think I'm more qualified and a better choice".
However, she would never, ever say anything so direct. She uses innuendo to avoid ever actually saying anything.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Bettie
(16,110 posts)she never said the exact words, but she made her meaning quite clear by refusing to answer the question at all.
But, it is what I expect from her: no real answers, weasel words to cover her real intentions.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Just for you because I know how much you like bringing this subject up . Enjoy .
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)It must be so sad to be so hateful of a little bird . Sad.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)when she called Obama unqualified to be president, or her vice president.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)The only legal qualifications being a natural born citizen who is at least 35 years of age.
Hillary crossed the line, again.
She is going to lose this one. I think she knows it too. She went into full retreat mode earlier today.
http://crooksandliars.com/2016/04/hillary-clinton-responds-sanders-ill-take
^snip^
"Look, I didnt I dont know why hes saying that. But I will take Bernie Sanders over Donald Trump or Ted Cruz any time. So lets keep our eye on whats really at stake in this election," Clinton reminded.
She had an easy opening to counter attack, but she ran scared instead. This is what happens when most (D)s think the person you are attacking is more honest than you are.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Why don't you post the entire poll results, not just the "trustworthy" portion? Where's the link to the entire poll?
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I use the trustworthy numbers because this is about believing her side of the story. Most (D)s (and far more (I)s) will believe Bernie over Hillary.
I like that graphic, although it is getting a little old, her numbers seem to be even worse now. Here is where I get that graphic from:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clintons-advantage-hits-campaign-low-lags-trust-leading/story?id=36524847
Here are a couple other links, although I don't really like the sources for them. That is why I was using ABC. Plus that graphic focuses on "Leaning (D)".
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/17/poll-hillary-clinton-least-honest-and-trustworthy-of-all-presidential-candidates/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/08/hillary-clintons-honest-and-trustworthy-numbers-are-lower-than-ever-it-might-not-matter/
^snip^
In a brand new Washington Post-ABC News national poll, just 37 percent of people believe Hillary Clinton is honest and trustworthy while 57 percent say they don't think she is.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Bernie is being led by the nose rings right now and it's too bad really. His reputation is completely obliterated.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)The post lacks credibility because there's no politically-aware person who doesn't already know that Hillary Clinton, not Sanders, is the person with a constant and abiding honesty problem. So when people read words such as the ones you wrote in the OP, you may get MLA points for style, but you're not convincing anyone. In order to convince people, you'd need to get them to drop the strongly-held belief that she's a dishonest person. And you won't be able to do that, because she just keeps going. So it's a nice post, but it doesn't map to reality.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)to be president. The WAPO's own fact checker gave this claim 3 Pinocchios.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)when asked if she thought Obama was a Muslim?
This is too funny.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)Because this shit doesn't have a thing to do with issues I care about, and that Bernie supports.
And I've voted against my own economic interest FOR THE LAST TIME. Here's why I'm for Bernie.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1673279
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)Bernie supporters Doctrine!!
Beacool
(30,249 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)Look, she was certainly unquestionably implying it, even if she didn't say it outright as the headline had suggested. And the answer is: "Hillary continues to describe her opponents policy platform as pie in the sky, yet corporations paying their fair share of taxes could easily fund many of Sanders proposals."
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-panama-papers-could-hand-bernie-sanders-the-keys-to-the-white-house-a6969481.html
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)international scam that ever happened- because she is more in favor of trade between nations? Honestly, it would seem like the second to me. There really doesn't even have to be a connection for people to manufacture a CT and claim they see "smoke".
Beacool
(30,249 posts)She [Hillary Clinton] has been saying lately that she thinks that I am, quote unquote, not qualified to be president.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.), at a rally at Temple University, Philadelphia, April 6, 2016
Many readers have asked about these remarks by Bernie Sanders, which led him to list the ways that he thought the former secretary of state was not qualified to become president. Did Clinton really say Sanders was unqualified?
-----
The Pinocchio Test
Sanders is putting words in Clintons mouth. She never said quote unquote that he was not qualified to be president. In fact, she diplomatically went out of her way to avoid saying that, without at the same time saying he was qualified. The Washington Post article appropriately noted that she raised questions about his qualifications, but certainly never said or suggested she said Sanders was unqualified.
Sanders would have been on safer ground if he had said Clinton is raising questions about his qualifications and now he would like to raise questions about her qualifications. But he cant slam her for words she did not say.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/04/07/sanderss-incorrect-claim-that-clinton-called-him-not-qualified-for-the-presidency/
Ahhhh, the devil's in the details.......
jfern
(5,204 posts)Either way the Washington Post is wrong.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Sanders chose to allude to the WAPO's headline and not to her actual words. Today, he had the opportunity to correct what he said and he doubled down. Therefore, I have ceased to give an iota what else he has to say on any subject.
jfern
(5,204 posts)zigby
(125 posts)Nobody except the already embattled partisans give's a flyin rat's ass about this kind of thing. So why raise your blood pressure with it?
Beacool
(30,249 posts)He made an assertion that was simply not true. He then had the nerve to state that she was not qualified for the job. As far as I'm concerned, he can go and rot.
zigby
(125 posts)I mean, look at the Clown Car Party, at least nobody on our side is tweeting pix of each other's wives!!!!
Beacool
(30,249 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)that she used when she was asked if Obama was't a Muslim. And she got a lot of shit for that.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Sanders lied and he was caught on it. He can double down all he wants, but still gets 3 Pinocchios for it.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Tired of his act.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)She went aaaaaaaamooooooost there, and "journalists" took care of the rest.