Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:45 PM Apr 2016

Bernie Lied! Hillary Clinton Actually Refused to Call Him Unqualified… Three Times

by Tommy Christopher
April 7th, 2016

Democratic presidential candidate and independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has initiated a mass fainting spell among the political media by rattling off a list of reasons why he considers rival candidate and current frontrunner Hillary Clinton “not qualified to be president.” The attack has also galvanized Hillary’s supporters, who have responded with the trending hashtag #HillarySoQualified. Unlike a lot of pundits, I’m not that bothered by the charge, I love a smash-mouth campaign, and if it is indeed to be on like Donkey Kong, Hillary Clinton can handle herself.

What is a problem, though, is that Bernie Sanders launched his attack by first telling a big, fat, insane lie about Hillary. Here’s the full context of Bernie’s remarks, but pay close attention to the first part:

She has been saying, lately, that she thinks that I am quote-unquote “not qualified to be president.”

As Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon noted on Twitter, Hillary never said that, but it’s actually worse than that. Hillary Clinton not only never said that, she actually was aggressively pressed to say that exact thing, three different times in a row, and like some kind of reverse-Apostle Peter, refused each time.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/bernie-lied-hillary-clinton-actually-refused-to-call-him-unqualified-three-times/

IMO, Sanders crossed the line. Barring some unforeseen event, Hillary will be the nominee. Her opponent has a right to run a campaign that he considers effective, but he shouldn't have tried to disqualify the woman who will in all probability face Trump in the GE.

111 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Lied! Hillary Clinton Actually Refused to Call Him Unqualified… Three Times (Original Post) Beacool Apr 2016 OP
Good she should have done like Bernie and just said it. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #1
As if....... Beacool Apr 2016 #6
Prove it Kalidurga Apr 2016 #11
DOMA, DADT, NAFTA, TPP, TTIP, Panama, IWR, for-profit prisons for "superpredators"... Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #22
Very true statement there Lordquinton Apr 2016 #37
If you like war and bad trade agreements. She doesn't have the integrity or morality for the job. Crabby Abbey Apr 2016 #56
And responses like that.... daleanime Apr 2016 #60
Poised and polished. frylock Apr 2016 #92
A lot more poised and polished than the senator from VT. Beacool Apr 2016 #96
There's no penetrating the bubble. frylock Apr 2016 #100
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Apr 2016 #31
Well people with listening comprehension heard it. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Apr 2016 #63
Yeah it must be hard to navigate life with blinders on and ear plugs in place Kalidurga Apr 2016 #65
They also heard Susan Sarandon say that she was voting for Trump. frylock Apr 2016 #93
Well they have creative hearing gotta give them that. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #94
She didn't say Obama was Muslim either. Just that she couldn't say for sure. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #2
She also couldn't say she wouldn't lie. nt revbones Apr 2016 #4
She also didn't flat out suggest Obama could be assassinated, but she sure did insinuate it... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #14
But hey, if she doesn't use the exact word, just every synonym then it's ok... nt revbones Apr 2016 #15
Bernie lied again. Simple as that redstateblues Apr 2016 #18
It's becoming more ohheckyeah Apr 2016 #41
Yep Iliyah Apr 2016 #3
By the way, #HillarySoQualified is a great trending hashtag, for humor. Please visit and add. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #5
Nope, I'll leave bombarding the internet with nasty posts to the BernieBros. Beacool Apr 2016 #8
Shouldn't your banner say Hillary for Hillary? wiltom99 Apr 2016 #21
Nope. Beacool Apr 2016 #49
They didn't start the hashtag. They didn't start the "disqualify" movement. Hillary did. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author imari362 Apr 2016 #62
Maybe Hillary supporters don't care about her record. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #67
KNR Lucinda Apr 2016 #7
She refused to call him qualified AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #9
She's running against him. Beacool Apr 2016 #12
Case closed AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #19
Yes rock Apr 2016 #110
You realize she that's not her job, she's running against him. all american girl Apr 2016 #20
She actually said he would be a much better president than the republicans. Agschmid Apr 2016 #23
It's not her job to endorse her opponent. He did a shitty interview and got called on it. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #59
So what? She persisted in directing the reporter to SPECIFICS and ISSUES. pnwmom Apr 2016 #72
She also refused to call him BirdieBro so what!? uponit7771 Apr 2016 #99
no she didn't outright florida08 Apr 2016 #10
She didn't at all. She purposely AVOIDED saying that. But Bernie said "quote unquote, pnwmom Apr 2016 #73
You are partially right noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #89
Exactly! Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #101
What is so hard about simply saying "He is certainly qualified" in response? Armstead Apr 2016 #13
What is so hard not to lie and state something that she didn't? Beacool Apr 2016 #16
She fed into it and you damn well know it. Armstead Apr 2016 #25
Delusional noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #85
I don't give a flying fig about polls on honesty and trustworthiness. Beacool Apr 2016 #90
It's very clear noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #91
Why is it her fault that he lied? all american girl Apr 2016 #24
he was reacting to what she and her campaign are actually doing Armstead Apr 2016 #27
What exactly did they do that made him so mad? all american girl Apr 2016 #28
She consistently lies and distorts Armstead Apr 2016 #33
I thought we could all agree the Cuba thing wasn't really a great thing all american girl Apr 2016 #35
I don't understand what you are saying. Armstead Apr 2016 #45
Yeah, sorry about that. all american girl Apr 2016 #50
She appropriately directed the reporter to specifics about issues -- not useless global judgments. pnwmom Apr 2016 #87
Common campaign courtesy (and smart iof you don't want to alienate people she will need) is... Armstead Apr 2016 #95
There's this that was pretty explicit beedle Apr 2016 #17
She was saying that she was more qualified to face McCain in the GE because Beacool Apr 2016 #26
If that was her only intent then she was not very bright Armstead Apr 2016 #30
No, she did worst beedle Apr 2016 #104
But if you want to get all particular and exact .. beedle Apr 2016 #107
Face it...he's just as much of a politician as the rest of them. anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #29
AMEN ohheckyeah Apr 2016 #47
Yes, but his supporters think that he's above the fray, contrary to his past history. Beacool Apr 2016 #51
Enormous K & R. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #32
that's not what the Washington Post said TheSarcastinator Apr 2016 #36
She used weasel words Bettie Apr 2016 #38
She never said he was unqualified, no matter what the podium bird tells him uponit7771 Apr 2016 #42
As I said Bettie Apr 2016 #58
Podium bird says Sanders NEVER EVER lies dammit !!! /sarcasm uponit7771 Apr 2016 #39
You seem to be suffering bird withdrawls TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #103
Birdiebro hasn't told Sanders how to break up the big banks, I'm not the one missing the bird guy uponit7771 Apr 2016 #105
Even Rachael found a reason to smile TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #106
No she made sure it was done on CNN before the MSNBC interview bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #40
So she learned something from 2008 Lordquinton Apr 2016 #43
She also refused to say he is qualified three times. Motown_Johnny Apr 2016 #44
You keep posting that portion of the ABC/WAPO poll as if it means anything. Beacool Apr 2016 #54
Google is beyond your comprehension? Motown_Johnny Apr 2016 #64
I wanted you to admit that it was the only graph that favored Sanders in that poll. Beacool Apr 2016 #70
Good for her for staying our of the steaming pile Weaver has plopped Bernie into Sheepshank Apr 2016 #48
You're using all the right words, but the post lacks credibility. That's not your fault. It's hers. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #52
No, what lacks credibility is Sanders saying that Hillary said that he was unqualified Beacool Apr 2016 #76
May I direct your attention to.... notadmblnd Apr 2016 #53
Did she say Sanders IS qualified to be President? Did she "take him at his word" as with Obama, merrily Apr 2016 #55
Bernie is getting pretty prickly because he knows he can't win. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #57
If that's the best you got, I'm still for Bernie. PatrickforO Apr 2016 #61
good, informative post. Now get ready for the RAGE. How dare you speak of things not part of the Bill USA Apr 2016 #66
Well, some people choose to go through life wearing blinders. Beacool Apr 2016 #82
Let's continue this media BS circus instead of focusing on the Panama papers. JudyM Apr 2016 #68
How is Hillary connected to the Panama Papers- or are we automatically blaming her for every bettyellen Apr 2016 #69
K&R betsuni Apr 2016 #71
Here's WAPO's own fact checker correcting the record. Beacool Apr 2016 #74
"Clinton questions whether Sanders is Qualified to be President" - Washington Post jfern Apr 2016 #78
Yes, their own fact checkers called them out on their mischaracterization of her words. Beacool Apr 2016 #80
She did really imply he wasn't qualified jfern Apr 2016 #84
This is the time I suggest logging off and getting some perspective. zigby Apr 2016 #75
Because it was hitting below the belt. Beacool Apr 2016 #79
If that's the worst they come out with against each other, then it's a tame season. zigby Apr 2016 #83
To be fair, I don't think that there are out there nude pics of Mrs. Sanders or of Bill. Beacool Apr 2016 #98
She didn't even have the decency to say "as far as I know" jfern Apr 2016 #77
Deflecting much? Beacool Apr 2016 #81
It's pretty clear she was trying to disqualify him. Don't play dumb. jfern Apr 2016 #86
The one playing dumb is Sanders. He knows she didn't call him unqualified. Beacool Apr 2016 #88
She strongly implied it. A lot stronger than she implied Obama might be a Muslim jfern Apr 2016 #97
He's a freakin' LIAR itsrobert Apr 2016 #102
Oh please. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #108
False basselope Apr 2016 #109
Bernie Sanders has been caught in a large number of lies recently Gothmog Apr 2016 #111

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
11. Prove it
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:53 PM
Apr 2016

specific policies she has done that has benefited people in need besides getting health care for children and very few other people.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
22. DOMA, DADT, NAFTA, TPP, TTIP, Panama, IWR, for-profit prisons for "superpredators"...
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:03 PM
Apr 2016

Yes, I guess you could call the Clinton legacy "presidential" - but I prefer calling it "bigotry, war, and greed".

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
60. And responses like that....
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:44 PM
Apr 2016

keep driving her untrustworthy ratings up. Please continue Madame Secretary.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
100. There's no penetrating the bubble.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 09:57 PM
Apr 2016

I provide documented video evidence while you provide your misguided opinion.

Response to Kalidurga (Reply #1)

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
46. Well people with listening comprehension heard it.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:24 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary supporters are all like nah she didn't say that. It's funny though how they can hear sexist remarks that were never said nor meant.

Response to Kalidurga (Reply #46)

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
65. Yeah it must be hard to navigate life with blinders on and ear plugs in place
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:04 PM
Apr 2016

But, I guess as long as they can still post on DU life is good for them.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
34. They didn't start the hashtag. They didn't start the "disqualify" movement. Hillary did.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

She just doesn't like the backlash of it all.

By the way, as usual the comments are not so much nasty as true.

Response to Beacool (Reply #8)

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
12. She's running against him.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:54 PM
Apr 2016

She wasn't about to help him, but she didn't cross the line. He did. Therein lies the difference.


Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
23. She actually said he would be a much better president than the republicans.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie handed the Republicans a commercial.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
72. So what? She persisted in directing the reporter to SPECIFICS and ISSUES.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 06:34 PM
Apr 2016

And that was entirely reasonable. What he said, OTOH, was a flat-out lie.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/sanders-clinton-not-qualified-to-be-president-221666#ixzz45BHZUdMq
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

"Now the other day, I think, Secretary Clinton appeared to be getting a little bit nervous," he began. "We have won, we have won seven out of eight of the recent primaries and caucuses. And she has been saying lately that she thinks that I am, quote unquote, not qualified to be president.


pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
73. She didn't at all. She purposely AVOIDED saying that. But Bernie said "quote unquote,
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 06:36 PM
Apr 2016

not qualified to be President."

He accused her -- falsely -- of using those precise words.

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
89. You are partially right
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:12 PM
Apr 2016

You are correct that she purposely avoided saying the words but it wasn't because she was doing something noble. She purposely avoided saying the words because she knew after her comments that the media would do it for her. Think about it. The only conclusion the media and Sanders could draw from her comments was that she was basically saying he was unqualified. She knew she didn't need to use the words for the attack to land. She got exactly what she wanted and she thought she left no fingerprints behind but she forgot that we've seen her in action before. We know what she was doing - the media knew what she was doing and Sanders knew what she was doing. The only people evidently who didn't know what she was doing were the Hillary supporters. It was a clumsy attempt to go after Sanders but cheer up she will go after him again and again and again.

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
16. What is so hard not to lie and state something that she didn't?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:01 PM
Apr 2016

Furthermore, what was he thinking to say in a rally that she wasn't qualified to be president and then give a laundry list of reasons?

He crossed the line and now the gloves are off.


 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
25. She fed into it and you damn well know it.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

You are certainly entitled to prefer her brand of politics.

But please don't pretend you believe she is some innocent victim of a twisting of her intent and words.

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
85. Delusional
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:02 PM
Apr 2016

I hate to burst your bubble but this whole narrative was created by the Hillary campaign to try to bring down Sanders honesty numbers. The whole thing was planned out and put into motion after her huge loss in Wisconsin. All you have to do is view all the video that's out there of her various appearances to see it.

90% of Wisconsin Democrats Think Sanders Is Honest, Compared to Only 59% Who Think Clinton Is Honest

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-hanley/90-of-wisconsin-democrats_b_9621052.html

And it's not just Wisconsin Democrats who believe this. Hillary has a problem. A majority of voters think she isn't honest or trustworthy but they do think her opponent is. And guess what? They will still believe this after this poorly manufactured attempt to tar Bernie with the dishonesty label fails to gain traction. She's lied so much during her career that people just don't believe that she's the victim in all of this. And rightly so. This campaign tactic will hurt her not help her. I don't expect you to believe this because you are one of her supporters but focusing on this contrived narrative will only draw more attention to her problem. But please, as a Bernie supporter, keep pushing it. It gives us more of an opportunity to talk about our honest candidate.

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
90. I don't give a flying fig about polls on honesty and trustworthiness.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:12 PM
Apr 2016

They mean nothing in the long run. The truth is that more people have voted for Hilary than have voted for Sanders and she will be the nominee. Sanders chose to overreact and misinterpret what she said based on a WAPO headline that was incorrect.



all american girl

(1,788 posts)
24. Why is it her fault that he lied?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

Doesn't he bear some responsibility to read the story and not just the headline?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
27. he was reacting to what she and her campaign are actually doing
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:07 PM
Apr 2016

This legalistic parsing of words is just a longstanding Clinton "It depends on the meaning of what is is" tactic.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
33. She consistently lies and distorts
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

She loves to take things out of context and use them against her opponents.

Just one example from the Florida debate. Twisting the complex relationship between the US and Latin America and directly implying that Sanders supports brutal dictatorships -- when she knows better. It was a vicious, knowing smear.

And I just want to add one thing to the question you were asking Senator Sanders. I think in that same interview, he praised what he called the revolution of values in Cuba and talked about how people were working for the common good, not for themselves.

I just couldn't disagree more. You know, if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, you imprison people or even kill people for expressing their opinions, for expressing freedom of speech, that is not the kind of revolution of values that I ever want to see anywhere.

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
35. I thought we could all agree the Cuba thing wasn't really a great thing
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:19 PM
Apr 2016

not saying the guy before was great, both were bad.

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
50. Yeah, sorry about that.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:33 PM
Apr 2016

After I hit send I realized what a crappy post that was. I went to bed last last night, got up early this morning. It's only 9:30 at night here and I'm ready from bed. I think I will call it a night. Sorry again.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
87. She appropriately directed the reporter to specifics about issues -- not useless global judgments.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:06 PM
Apr 2016
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
95. Common campaign courtesy (and smart iof you don't want to alienate people she will need) is...
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:36 PM
Apr 2016

to say something decent and straightforward, and move on. Take up specifics seperatly to sell herself.

Otherwise it devolves into this personalized back and forth over trivial parsing. That's the old politics of personal destruction.

Personally, I wish Sanders had not risen to the bait either.

But this kind of stupid shit is what has turned so many people off of politics and created an environment of cynicism and apathy, and ultimately turns the nation over to the bad guys.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
17. There's this that was pretty explicit
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:01 PM
Apr 2016


Rachael Maddow (who now fawns over Hillary, said at the time it sounded like Hillary was vying to be McCain's VP)

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
26. She was saying that she was more qualified to face McCain in the GE because
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:06 PM
Apr 2016

they would be more evenly matched. They both had a lot more political experience than Obama, who had only been a US senator for two years before he ran for president. She never called Obama unqualified to be president. Sanders just did call her unqualified and gave a list of reasons why he thought so.

A Democrat doesn't do that to the front runner in the latter part of a primary season. Then again, he's not really a Democrat.





 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
30. If that was her only intent then she was not very bright
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:11 PM
Apr 2016

She habitually does what she accuses Sanders of doing. Smearing her primary opponent without thinking of what the GOP will do with it.





 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
107. But if you want to get all particular and exact ..
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:14 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie never called Hillary unqualified.

He preceded every 'unqualified' with an 'IF' ... so, if Clinton wants to admit to the 'IF' stipulations, then sure, Sanders called Clinton 'unqualified', otherwise why does Hillary and her fans think Sanders meant 'Hillary' when he was explaining the parameters of what it means to be 'unqualified'?

"IF you steal money, you're a criminal": when you take that sentence as a personal insult, then you are a criminal! If you are not stealing money, then don't claim I called you a criminal!!!

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
29. Face it...he's just as much of a politician as the rest of them.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:08 PM
Apr 2016

To win, you have to play the game. Exactly why I don't fault Hillary for going by the standard for modern political candidates and having super-PACs. You don't bring a knife to a gunfight...

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
51. Yes, but his supporters think that he's above the fray, contrary to his past history.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:35 PM
Apr 2016

As a Socialist and Independent he knows how to fight and fight dirty to stay relevant and win elections. Acting above the fray was just a pretense. Well, he's stopped pretending and reverted to form.

Bettie

(16,110 posts)
38. She used weasel words
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:20 PM
Apr 2016

but made it very clear that she believes that.

If she wanted to shut it down, she would have said "Of course he's qualified, I just think I'm more qualified and a better choice".

However, she would never, ever say anything so direct. She uses innuendo to avoid ever actually saying anything.

Bettie

(16,110 posts)
58. As I said
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:41 PM
Apr 2016

she never said the exact words, but she made her meaning quite clear by refusing to answer the question at all.

But, it is what I expect from her: no real answers, weasel words to cover her real intentions.

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
103. You seem to be suffering bird withdrawls
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:07 PM
Apr 2016


Just for you because I know how much you like bringing this subject up . Enjoy .

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
43. So she learned something from 2008
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:22 PM
Apr 2016

when she called Obama unqualified to be president, or her vice president.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
44. She also refused to say he is qualified three times.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:23 PM
Apr 2016

The only legal qualifications being a natural born citizen who is at least 35 years of age.


Hillary crossed the line, again.


She is going to lose this one. I think she knows it too. She went into full retreat mode earlier today.


http://crooksandliars.com/2016/04/hillary-clinton-responds-sanders-ill-take

^snip^

"Look, I didn’t — I don’t know why he’s saying that. But I will take Bernie Sanders over Donald Trump or Ted Cruz any time. So let’s keep our eye on what’s really at stake in this election," Clinton reminded.





She had an easy opening to counter attack, but she ran scared instead. This is what happens when most (D)s think the person you are attacking is more honest than you are.









Beacool

(30,249 posts)
54. You keep posting that portion of the ABC/WAPO poll as if it means anything.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:39 PM
Apr 2016

Why don't you post the entire poll results, not just the "trustworthy" portion? Where's the link to the entire poll?

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
64. Google is beyond your comprehension?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:04 PM
Apr 2016

I use the trustworthy numbers because this is about believing her side of the story. Most (D)s (and far more (I)s) will believe Bernie over Hillary.

I like that graphic, although it is getting a little old, her numbers seem to be even worse now. Here is where I get that graphic from:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clintons-advantage-hits-campaign-low-lags-trust-leading/story?id=36524847


Here are a couple other links, although I don't really like the sources for them. That is why I was using ABC. Plus that graphic focuses on "Leaning (D)".

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/17/poll-hillary-clinton-least-honest-and-trustworthy-of-all-presidential-candidates/




https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/08/hillary-clintons-honest-and-trustworthy-numbers-are-lower-than-ever-it-might-not-matter/

^snip^

In a brand new Washington Post-ABC News national poll, just 37 percent of people believe Hillary Clinton is honest and trustworthy while 57 percent say they don't think she is.




 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
48. Good for her for staying our of the steaming pile Weaver has plopped Bernie into
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:27 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie is being led by the nose rings right now and it's too bad really. His reputation is completely obliterated.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
52. You're using all the right words, but the post lacks credibility. That's not your fault. It's hers.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:36 PM
Apr 2016

The post lacks credibility because there's no politically-aware person who doesn't already know that Hillary Clinton, not Sanders, is the person with a constant and abiding honesty problem. So when people read words such as the ones you wrote in the OP, you may get MLA points for style, but you're not convincing anyone. In order to convince people, you'd need to get them to drop the strongly-held belief that she's a dishonest person. And you won't be able to do that, because she just keeps going. So it's a nice post, but it doesn't map to reality.

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
76. No, what lacks credibility is Sanders saying that Hillary said that he was unqualified
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:34 PM
Apr 2016

to be president. The WAPO's own fact checker gave this claim 3 Pinocchios.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
55. Did she say Sanders IS qualified to be President? Did she "take him at his word" as with Obama,
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:39 PM
Apr 2016

when asked if she thought Obama was a Muslim?

This is too funny.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
61. If that's the best you got, I'm still for Bernie.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:45 PM
Apr 2016

Because this shit doesn't have a thing to do with issues I care about, and that Bernie supports.

And I've voted against my own economic interest FOR THE LAST TIME. Here's why I'm for Bernie.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1673279

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
66. good, informative post. Now get ready for the RAGE. How dare you speak of things not part of the
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:32 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie supporters Doctrine!!

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
68. Let's continue this media BS circus instead of focusing on the Panama papers.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:48 PM
Apr 2016



Look, she was certainly unquestionably implying it, even if she didn't say it outright as the headline had suggested. And the answer is: "Hillary continues to describe her opponent’s policy platform as ‘pie in the sky’, yet corporations paying their fair share of taxes could easily fund many of Sanders’ proposals."
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-panama-papers-could-hand-bernie-sanders-the-keys-to-the-white-house-a6969481.html
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
69. How is Hillary connected to the Panama Papers- or are we automatically blaming her for every
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 05:14 PM
Apr 2016

international scam that ever happened- because she is more in favor of trade between nations? Honestly, it would seem like the second to me. There really doesn't even have to be a connection for people to manufacture a CT and claim they see "smoke".

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
74. Here's WAPO's own fact checker correcting the record.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:31 PM
Apr 2016
Sanders’s incorrect claim that Clinton called him ‘not qualified’ for the presidency

She [Hillary Clinton] has been saying lately that she thinks that I am, quote unquote, not qualified to be president.”

— Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.), at a rally at Temple University, Philadelphia, April 6, 2016

Many readers have asked about these remarks by Bernie Sanders, which led him to list the ways that he thought the former secretary of state was “not qualified” to become president. Did Clinton really say Sanders was unqualified?

-----

The Pinocchio Test

Sanders is putting words in Clinton’s mouth. She never said “quote unquote” that he was not qualified to be president. In fact, she diplomatically went out of her way to avoid saying that, without at the same time saying he was qualified. The Washington Post article appropriately noted that she raised questions about his qualifications, but certainly never said or suggested she said Sanders was unqualified.

Sanders would have been on safer ground if he had said Clinton is raising questions about his qualifications and now he would like to raise questions about her qualifications. But he can’t slam her for words she did not say.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/04/07/sanderss-incorrect-claim-that-clinton-called-him-not-qualified-for-the-presidency/

Ahhhh, the devil's in the details.......

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
80. Yes, their own fact checkers called them out on their mischaracterization of her words.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:42 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders chose to allude to the WAPO's headline and not to her actual words. Today, he had the opportunity to correct what he said and he doubled down. Therefore, I have ceased to give an iota what else he has to say on any subject.

zigby

(125 posts)
75. This is the time I suggest logging off and getting some perspective.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:33 PM
Apr 2016

Nobody except the already embattled partisans give's a flyin rat's ass about this kind of thing. So why raise your blood pressure with it?

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
79. Because it was hitting below the belt.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:38 PM
Apr 2016

He made an assertion that was simply not true. He then had the nerve to state that she was not qualified for the job. As far as I'm concerned, he can go and rot.

zigby

(125 posts)
83. If that's the worst they come out with against each other, then it's a tame season.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:53 PM
Apr 2016

I mean, look at the Clown Car Party, at least nobody on our side is tweeting pix of each other's wives!!!!

jfern

(5,204 posts)
77. She didn't even have the decency to say "as far as I know"
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:36 PM
Apr 2016

that she used when she was asked if Obama was't a Muslim. And she got a lot of shit for that.

Beacool

(30,249 posts)
81. Deflecting much?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:43 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders lied and he was caught on it. He can double down all he wants, but still gets 3 Pinocchios for it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Lied! Hillary Clin...