Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRobert B. Reich: Why the major media still marginalize Bernie Sanders
(snip)
Since mid-March, Sanders has been on a roll. He has won six out of the seven Democratic primary contests, and hes won them big, beating Clinton by 40 percentage points or more in Idaho, Utah, Alaska, Hawaii and Washington. On Tuesday, he took Wisconsin.
The enthusiasm for Sanders isnt waning. If anything, its growing. In Idaho and Alaska, he inspired record-breaking primary turnouts, attracting thousands of new voters. He did the same thing in Colorado, Kansas, Maine and Michigan.
In March, Sanders raised $44 million, a new monthly high for his White House bid. The campaigns previous fundraising record was set in February, when it raised $43.5 million, compared to Clintons $30 million. And most of Sanders money has been in small donations so far, more than 6.5 million contributions from 2 million individual donors.
Sanders is still drawing huge crowds. Last week, 18,500 showed up to hear him speak in the South Bronx.
Young people continue to flock to the Sanders campaign.
Yet if you read the Washington Post or the New York Times, or watch CNN or even MSNBC, or listen to the major pollsters and pundits, youd come to the same conclusion as my friend.
Every success by Sanders is met with a story or column or talking head whose message is but he cant possibly win.
The real reason the major national media cant see whats happening is they exist inside the bubble of establishment politics, centered in Washington, and the bubble of establishment power, centered in New York. So theyre most interested in the personalities of the candidates, and in the people and resources backing them.
(snip)
http://journalstar.com/news/opinion/editorial/columnists/robert-b-reich-why-the-major-media-still-marginalize-bernie/article_e43289d6-060f-5a49-a28c-5ee9e162ed62.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 512 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert B. Reich: Why the major media still marginalize Bernie Sanders (Original Post)
Uncle Joe
Apr 2016
OP
Octafish
(55,745 posts)1. Democracy is a threat to the Establishment.
That's why they bought the Republican Party way back when.
Imagine Reich's surprise when they started buying our Party.
Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)2. Precisely, Octafish.
"Democracy is a threat to the Establishment"
Peace to you.
moondust
(19,988 posts)3. They want a corporatist in the WH.
Preferably a dumb one like GWB who can be easily manipulated by the financial gods and the MIC. Bernie is not that person; he is the least likely to be manipulable for the benefit of their stock portfolios.
beedle
(1,235 posts)4. This is all you need to know about the MSM impartiality
Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)5. Thanks for the addition, beedle.
A lie which is half a truth is ever the blackest of lies. Alfred Lord Tennyson
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alfredlord118209.html
Peace to you.