2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs Barack Obama qualified to be President of the United States of America.
According to Bernie Sanders, candidates who use Super PACs (Obama did in 2012), support international trade agreements (Obama pushes the TPP) and who supported the Panama trade deal (Obama told Clinton to finalize it and get it approved) is not qualified to be President.
I disagree with Senator Sanders--I don't think those things disqualify him from the office of President.
17 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Because of corporate money, and supporting bad international trade deals, Obama like Clinton is not qualified to be President | |
6 (35%) |
|
Barack Obama is qualified to be President | |
11 (65%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... and not much more.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Pathetic.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Why try to put words in Bernie's mouth about President Obama, especially when Bernie never said that Obama was unqualified?
Instead of making shit up, look at what the Hillary Clinton campaign said about Obama in 08. She said it straight up!
We do not believe at this point that Sen. Obama has passed that key commander in chief test, Wolfson said. Later, Wolfson added that what Clinton views as Obama's failure to pass that test would disqualify him as a vice presidential pick, since a vice president must be prepared to step into the presidency at a moments notice. Sen. Clinton will not choose any candidate who has not at the time of choosing passed the national security threshold, period, Wolfson said.
But go ahead with your fantastical foray into what Bernie said about Obama.
Desperate times for the Clinton camp. Making shit up and lobbing grenades 24/7.
Stallion
(6,474 posts)because Clinton supporters have always been the Democratic Party. The remaining question is whether Sanders supporters can claim to be Democrats and if they aren't why is Sanders running under the Democratic flag. This election has given me a much better understanding why Obama's Job Approval lagged during his Presidency and it wasn't coming from actual Democrats
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)Who I vote for, and why, is a moral and a personal issue.
And here's why I'm still thinking about it...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1673279
TheBlackAdder
(28,207 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,207 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I think Obama was happy to have her endorsement, and I think she realized that 1) if she were to have any future in politics, she needed to reconcile with Obama in a big way and 2) the country and the party needed her to do that.
TheBlackAdder
(28,207 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Obama didn't give John Edwards shit for his endorsement.
TheBlackAdder
(28,207 posts).
The National Enquirer reported that scandal in 2007 and Edwards admitted to the affair in August 2008.
Edwards was damaged goods months before the election took place.
.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)And since he's been elected twice already this is a stupid moot question.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Most of whom can't stand our president. They believe he's a turd way corporatist war mongering sell out, and he didn't get them their unicorn sparkle pony either.
He is a POSUCS, as was posted here by a personality beloved by Sanders supporters.
I know they don't really GAF about what was said or posted or written about PBO eight years ago. It's just triangulation.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Although he doesn't seem to be a warmonger. Loves the Surveillance State though.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)You know what they say about opinions.
I'll give yours all the credence it warrants.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to explain that?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Off to Ignore with you.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)This political message board has a great many non democrats, non liberals, non progressives.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Not many people can say that about themselves.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)the record. Hmmm.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)But, it is silly season, so what the heck?
I can't wait for the convention, frankly. After it, we'll finally have a nominee to stand behind and all of this nonsense will end on DU.
Good luck to both candidates. I'll be watching to see who I'll be supporting for the November election.
Enough of this silliness, I say!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Echo chamber and all.
At least that's what they all say...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Holy shit, 12 hidden posts. Though you aren't the top, you know. You have work to do to win whatever medal you guys are trying to win.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Personally, if I said that Sanders supporters were Trump supporters, I might expect to have that hidden on a Democratic website, but apparently you know differently and it's all a conspiracy. Whatever helps you sleep through the night, I guess.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)She had a lot of baggage in 08 but now she has an avalanche of baggage.
Obama was not for any of the things on your list when he was running for President.
PufPuf23
(8,785 posts)I supported POTUS Obama in 2008 but have been disappointed by many of his actions as POTUS.
But POTUS Obama has been a good and transcendent POTUS and good for the nation and time.
My druthers were that POTUS Obama not follow neo-liberal economic policies but he did.
That still did not change my general approval.
Hillary Clinton started as the favored Democratic candidate for POTUS in 2008. Her negative campaigning harmed her candidacy and the problem has been repeated in 2016.
Hillary Clinton made poor decisions and actions as SOS. The Clinton's have enriched themselves more than any other exe-POTUS and The Clinton Foundation is also troubling.
The person in this clip (Hillary Clinton) is not suited to be POTUS nor CIC.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)So yes he's very qualified!
ecstatic
(32,707 posts)Bernie did, his campaign would have died on the spot. Only a white man could get away with being completely ignorant about key issues while running for the highest office.
beedle
(1,235 posts)What specific answer did Sanders give that was "disastrous"? Can you provide the question asked and his answer and explain why it was even wrong, let alone disastrous?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)that meant what?
But, hey, keep pushing that talking point. You might convince someone.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)So are most citizens over 35.
Fit/unfit is another question.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)It is not that any one is not qualified.
The Presidency is a unique enough position that there is no actual necessary experience that one can point out that makes one qualified.
The only one who is not qualified to run for the Presidency is Ted Cruz, since he's Canadian. (I mean, born in Canada to a non American father, and a mother who was trying to be naturalized in to a Canadian)
The question should be, are they not entangled to special interest enough that they could govern for the people, not the special interests.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I disagree with Obama on certtain issues, and I do think he allowed himself to become too tight with the corporate class.
But in terms of integrity, brains, personal values, and underlying positions....no comparison whatsoever.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Both of them were my last choice back in 2008.
I was more for Biden or any one else except those 2.
I voted for Obama because Palin came along.
Voted for Obama again since Romney was there.
As of yesterday, I felt like I could vote for Hillary if she were to win the primaries. Heck, I was happy with the three primary candidates initially.
At the moment, it's a little hard to think about. I am sure I would vote for the Democrat come General Election, but I would mostly be working on local elections if she were the nominee.
There are attacks on her that are unfair, and I've spoken up for her. Be it the emails, and the transcripts, I just don't see the point in even going for that.
Obama to me has brought the Democrats too far to the right. In the sense that he has given Republicans much of what they want, and even more when they demanded it for so little. He has even chastised other Democrats for not going along with what could be considered a bad bill, just by virtue of him being a Democrat, the others went along with him with legislation that would not have passed during the Bush era, as Democrats were at least fighting.
He took off the sails on many hopes, as he dropped the ball at the beginning of his Presidency.
Stating that, he did redeem himself quite a bit on the second half of his second term.
Please note, it is not that some people think fighting for fairness is easy, and could be done just like that. If that were the case, people like Senator Sanders would not be around. The problem with someone like Clinton, is that she has given up on fairness before even starting. The reason so many Independents like Bernie, is that they think he would actually go for the best possible outcome, rather than triangulate at the middle hoping for a crumb of what they ask for.
As for Clinton, she would not get in to the forefront of an issue until it is popular. Like Obama, both of them would not act or fight for what is right until there is enough of a support for them to even speak about it. For someone like Clinton to say that there will "Never be Universal Health Care in America" it basically makes it in to a self-fulfilling prophecy as it shows that she is never going to fight for anything hard.
However, one thing I must say for both... They generally have the right set of priorities. I tend to prefer Sanders as he focuses on Infrastructure and bringing accountability to the banking system. I also tend to agree with his K-12 education plan more than I do with say Obama or Clinton. Obama has done some great work for college education level matters, but I fear K-12 went to the wayside and the focus on testing and handing the funds to testing companies was a fiasco.
So I guess, in terms of the Agenda, I may give her a pass. However, in terms of actually looking for the best outcome, much like the hopeful Bernard Shaw quote "You see things; and you say, Why? But I dream things that never were; and I say, Why not?". She just isn't a leader in that sense.
That does not mean it makes her unqualified, as I said, the only one unqualified is Cruz, but the way she goes makes her a follower rather than a leader.
beedle
(1,235 posts)doing his fund raising the same way Clinton is doing hers, the no he would not qualify. Especially after we now know that the whole "unilateral disarmament' super PAC bullshit was a pile of .. well ... bullshit.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)But, he is our current president until 2017 and I'm not going to protest that. I won't even go so far as to post things he does that I don't agree with. I don't care in less than a year Bernie will be president and Hillary can go gnash her teeth quietly in a corner and we will get onto the business of changing the culture in this country.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)And do you agree or disagree with what Clinton said in '08?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The swooning over McSame was repulsive.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Interesting...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I canvassed in Iowa for Obama in 2008, so obviously I disagreed.
But it was completely within the bounds to question whether he had the right experience.
As Clinton likes to say, the voters made up their own minds and found him qualified.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)And she didn't question, she said he as unqualified in no unequivocal terms (if you want a source click on any number of threads about this current tactic, or just post 41) That's not questioning.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)She did not get up in front of a crowd of thousands and television cameras and flat out say he was unfit for office.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)It always is. Thanks to the Admins for giving us that in these polls!
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)When you reveal the names of those who voted that PBO is qualified, most of those names are Bernie's supporters. DU hasn't lost it's mind, we're just in a place a ridiculous divisions.
I look forward to the day when we're not playing this unproductive game of primary checkers! Love ya DU!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I think one or two of those no votes were likely a joke but one of the names confirms my opinion.
I always love DU polls.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Uh... he IS President of the United States. Where have you been?
As a matter of fact, he's a lame duck president of the United States and can't be one again.
So is there some stupid point you were trying to make with this dreck?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Isn't that Congress' approval rating?
Still don't know what this ridiculous poll is about.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)and checking it twice
beedle
(1,235 posts)Well, okay, I'll give her a break, maybe she would have voted yes, but not before her and her buddy John, the other (openly) Republican war mongering candidate in the race at the time.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I would not have been supportive of an Obama presidency.
edit - I would not have been supportive of pre-2015 Obama presidency. This last year I have been proud of his actions more than disappointed. Well, besides his continued push for TPP.