Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:05 AM Apr 2016

Our health care system is far from perfect but because of the ACA it is far better than it was.

Here is some perspective:

I work for a county Alcohol,drug and mental health services department in CA.

Before the ACA we had a large number of indigent patients in our psych hospital. Our cost per bed day is around $2,000. That is just the room and bed not treatment. By law we are not permitted to turn patients away. The money to pay for indigent patients care comes from state sales tax and vehicle license fees. It is called realignment funds. The state used to take care of mental health care but that service was realigned to the counties.

Since the ACA and since CA accepts expanded Medicaid, (Medi-Cal in CA) we have gotten reimbursed 100% for the care of indigent patients since they are new Medi-Cal patients not previously covered. It still doesn't cover all our costs (Medicaid pays 50% of billed costs to existing covered patients)

We still get the realignment funds but now since expanded medicaid we can treat more mental health and drug addicted people with our expanded budget.

We also have Medicare patients. Medicare pays a fixed fee for each type of service based on some complicated formulas. It does not cover our entire costs. Also patients have a deductable that our patients usually cannot pay so we eat that. Also there is a yearly maximum amount that Medicare pays per year. If a patient goes over that we eat it.


We need to improve the ACA not adopt Medicare for all. The ACA covers more of the costs of treatment.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Our health care system is far from perfect but because of the ACA it is far better than it was. (Original Post) upaloopa Apr 2016 OP
This sounds like a contradiction libtodeath Apr 2016 #1
Previously Medicaid did not cover adult males. Now it does through expanded medcaid. upaloopa Apr 2016 #3
That is hardly fair or right to punish the others. libtodeath Apr 2016 #4
Then let's all vote out republicans. We don't vote so they get to decide. upaloopa Apr 2016 #14
Where did I say different? libtodeath Apr 2016 #16
Indeed! HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #19
So you're lucky. Think it's helped any in those states that refused the expansion? hobbit709 Apr 2016 #2
That is not the fault of the ACA. Since states administer government health care they could refuse upaloopa Apr 2016 #5
It's helped people with pre-existing conditions Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #6
If they could afford the premiums and deductibles. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #7
We are not lucky the patients are lucky upaloopa Apr 2016 #15
Absolutely. Bernie says so all the time. But unfortunately the ACA doesn't really control costs & Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #8
I trust someone would improve the ACA more if they don't take big pharma money. fourcents Apr 2016 #9
It's not controlling costs zipplewrath Apr 2016 #10
The ACA will never cover everyone, it isn't designed to. Motown_Johnny Apr 2016 #11
No single payer is not the only answer. upaloopa Apr 2016 #13
What is your solution or proposal? libtodeath Apr 2016 #17
No, it can't. Motown_Johnny Apr 2016 #18
I just explained how the ACA covers homeless people in my OP upaloopa Apr 2016 #21
How to apply for Medi-Cal Motown_Johnny Apr 2016 #22
No it most certainly is not ibegurpard Apr 2016 #12
Speaking as a healthcare provider, it is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. seattleite Apr 2016 #20

libtodeath

(2,888 posts)
1. This sounds like a contradiction
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:08 AM
Apr 2016
Since the ACA and since CA accepts expanded Medicaid, (Medi-Cal in CA) we have gotten reimbursed 100% for the care of indigent patients since they are new Medi-Cal patients not previously covered. It still doesn't cover all our costs (Medicaid pays 50% of billed costs to existing covered patients)



upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
3. Previously Medicaid did not cover adult males. Now it does through expanded medcaid.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:14 AM
Apr 2016

It covered children and some women and paid 50% of billable costs. The care of newly covered adult male's is reimbures 100% of medicaid billable costs in the first year, 90% in the second year

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
14. Then let's all vote out republicans. We don't vote so they get to decide.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 12:55 PM
Apr 2016

That is where pragmatism has it over idealism.

libtodeath

(2,888 posts)
16. Where did I say different?
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 01:05 PM
Apr 2016

Universal,single payer is what we need to be pushing for and your own posts show why.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
5. That is not the fault of the ACA. Since states administer government health care they could refuse
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:17 AM
Apr 2016

medicare for all also. They could also refuse free in state tuition at state colleges.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
6. It's helped people with pre-existing conditions
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:18 AM
Apr 2016

who previously could be turned away by insurance companies.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
7. If they could afford the premiums and deductibles.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:19 AM
Apr 2016

There are many without pre-existing that still can't afford it.

Nanjeanne

(4,960 posts)
8. Absolutely. Bernie says so all the time. But unfortunately the ACA doesn't really control costs &
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:19 AM
Apr 2016

tax dollars in subsidies are going to already extremely profitable insurance companies who pay their CEOs and senior management exhorbitant salaries. As a tax payer - I find that a poor use of my money. I'd much rather pay it to the government for health CARE not insurance. As someone on Medicare - I love it!

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
10. It's not controlling costs
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:43 AM
Apr 2016

All those costs you are "eating" are going to eat you up soon. ACA doesn't control costs. The whole point of Medicare for all/Single Payer is to get control of the costs.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
11. The ACA will never cover everyone, it isn't designed to.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:46 AM
Apr 2016

If you agree that healthcare is a right, then replacing the ACA is the only logical policy position.

I agree it was a great improvement over what we had. I supported it from the beginning and still do now.

That doesn't mean it is the end of the journey. It is a stepping stone.

Single payer is the only logical goal, unless you want American citizens to die needlessly simply to protect corporate profits.


upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
13. No single payer is not the only answer.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 12:53 PM
Apr 2016

Our system can provide care to everyone if we are motivated to work toward it. Single payer raises costs by rasing taxes. We still pay but we give it a different name. It is still money out of our pockets.

Saying health care is a right is saying certain people must become health care providers to provide care coverd by the right at reimbursements we determine they should be permitted. So no it is not a right but is a goal we should strive for as a society.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
18. No, it can't.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:15 PM
Apr 2016

For example. How will the ACA ever cover homeless people?

In theory, they should already be covered by Medicaid. They have little or no income, this is exactly the type of person Medicaid should cover.

In reality, you need to prove that you qualify for Medicaid. People without any resources are unable to do this. Without a state issued ID and proof of income (or lack thereof) you can't prove you qualify for Medicaid.

The ACA is not designed to cover these people and there is no change to it which can be made to provide coverage for the homeless.

You may as well claim that you can alter an airplane to fly to the moon and back. You can't. It isn't designed for that. Yes, it serves a purpose and is much better than a train, but it won't ever get you to the moon.

The ACA is much better than we had but it won't ever cover everyone. Anyone who says it can is either lying or ignorant.



upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
21. I just explained how the ACA covers homeless people in my OP
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:32 PM
Apr 2016

We have a clinic that serves everyone who is poor or homeless it works the same as our mental health system does.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
22. How to apply for Medi-Cal
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:48 PM
Apr 2016
https://www.healthinsurance.org/california-medicaid/

^snip^


Online on the Covered California website.

By mail: complete an application, which is available in 12 languages, and mail it to Covered California at P.O. Box 989725 West Sacramento, CA 95798-9725.

In person at a county social service office. The directory includes phone numbers for each county office if you need more information or assistance.



So you are telling me that everyone who applies is accepted? What is to keep someone who does not qualify from applying and just not providing information about income? How can you tell that some of the people you are treating are actually eligible?

If so, then we may as well have a single payer system. Why do I need to pay premiums if I can just walk in somewhere and say I need medical attention but have no identification and no income?

This sounds ripe for fraud on both ends. How does the government keep track of how many people are actually being treated?

I'm not buying it. Besides, I could just as easily have used undocumented immigrants as my example and they are not covered, not even by Medi-Cal.

https://www.healthinsurance.org/california-medicaid/

^snip^


For undocumented immigrant adults, SB10 was also introduced in 2015, and will be addressed again once the 2016 legislative session begins in January. SB10 would pick up where SB4 leaves off, allowing adults age 19 and over to enroll in Medi-Cal without regard for immigration status.






ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
12. No it most certainly is not
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 11:47 AM
Apr 2016

We gave taxpayer dollars to insurance companies who have continued to jack up premiums and out of pockets and REQUIRED by law that people pay the vampires...for catastrophic coverage people can't afford anyway. No cost transparency either. We simply codified our insane system and called it "reform".

 

seattleite

(79 posts)
20. Speaking as a healthcare provider, it is NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:23 PM
Apr 2016

We need to get these horrid insurance companies OUT OF the American healthcare system. Period.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Our health care system is...