Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:53 AM Apr 2016

How well does HRC have to do in NY to remain credible?

It's her most recent "home state"...If she loses there, or just barely wins, what as you see it does that do to her campaign?

As people here see it, what support level, in voter percentage, does she absolutely have to take in NY?

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How well does HRC have to do in NY to remain credible? (Original Post) Ken Burch Apr 2016 OP
In political news: Clinton comes in second in NY Dem primary while Sanders finishes next to last Fumesucker Apr 2016 #1
She needs to be at least 10 points ahead. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #2
She could lose New York and she'd still win the nomination. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2016 #3
Yes. Because #Math. And #Inevitability. And because #ShesSoQualified. reformist2 Apr 2016 #15
She has to win big. At least something bigger than Bernie's win in Wisconsin Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #4
You're good at comedy! Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #6
LOL - in whose eyes? leftynyc Apr 2016 #12
Math has nothing to do with it. I'm telling you how she can avoid being humiliated in her home state Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #13
She's going to win NY leftynyc Apr 2016 #14
She's already more than 200 pledged delegates ahead. If she loses New York maybe Biden will jump in. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #16
No - I don't think Biden leftynyc Apr 2016 #17
Within 4% but the MSM will prop her up to the bitter end GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #5
Heilemann and Halperin say she's very badly damaged if she doesn't win NY. grasswire Apr 2016 #7
Because Sanders is so PATRICK Apr 2016 #8
If Bernie wins a majority of New York's 62 counties, that will be bad for her jfern Apr 2016 #9
As to "credible", if you follow consistency in action and word, she's not credible now. highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #10
50%. If she can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere. nt mhatrw Apr 2016 #11

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
1. In political news: Clinton comes in second in NY Dem primary while Sanders finishes next to last
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:56 AM
Apr 2016

She will still be the only credible candidate when Sanders gives his first State of the Nation speech.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
4. She has to win big. At least something bigger than Bernie's win in Wisconsin
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:58 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie won Wisconsin by 14 points. New York is even more favorable to Hillary because independents are not allowed to vote in primaries and her core voters are mostly Democratic Party loyalists.

Bernie won his home state with 86% of the vote.

Hillary should be able to easily get at least 60% of the vote in New York otherwise she's going to look like a huge loser.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
14. She's going to win NY
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 05:30 AM
Apr 2016

And she'll still be over 200 pledged delegates ahead when she does. Simple math.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
17. No - I don't think Biden
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 05:53 AM
Apr 2016

or anyone else will jump in. And I think people need to be reminded that she won NY in 2008 also. She's very popular here.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
7. Heilemann and Halperin say she's very badly damaged if she doesn't win NY.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:14 AM
Apr 2016

I believe "toast" is the word they used.

PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
8. Because Sanders is so
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:32 AM
Apr 2016

opposed by the "establishment" that it would be more important to win than to come close. No one is going to state the obvious unless he wields a knockout punch. Losing close will drive HRC up a wall but it draws out the struggle done the road. She needs to win by five to put Sanders back down as terrible a performance as that would be. Sanders needs a stronger win than Michigan to send her down for the credibility count.

Every election is different. We don't have suppression or cheating or crossovers. We do have effective party machines and organizations in the tank, so to speak for Clinton. That is a powerful advantage with all the rest of the media bias and Wall Street favor. But this can be a maverick state for a better candidate and change. I think some of the same dynamics can simply switch on and "confound" the experts. The debate may actually make a big difference and Sanders cannot afford to let himself be victimized in any unfair way even if such things have backfired often with his less than politic rival.

It is crucial with the stacked and besieged party leadership trapped with Clinton that he keep actually winning big Dem states. More than delegate count this would give the poor judgment of the party leadership no way out except acknowledging Sanders- or a brokered convention, since the GOP is possibly doing one itself- the endgame of two poorly performing institutions. Obama's path was made easier because the leadership more readily split off to back his cause. He didn't have to beat Clinton in all the later states.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
10. As to "credible", if you follow consistency in action and word, she's not credible now.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:43 AM
Apr 2016

I don't trust her to look after my interests in any way, and that is backed up with plenty of proof about both her and Bill.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How well does HRC have to...