Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's Bernie's full quote on Hillary not being qualified-not as simplistic as we're told (Original Post) azurnoir Apr 2016 OP
so basically, he is the only qualified person on the planet. because fundraising. bettyellen Apr 2016 #1
He mentioned several reasons jfern Apr 2016 #2
I'm sure there are others on the planet who are equally as qualified as Bernie ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #6
According to him, everyone running for congress this November is "on the take" with that bettyellen Apr 2016 #10
And he's right about that. If you want clean hands, don't take the money. ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #15
So we need to also replace everyone in congress too. Everyone. bettyellen Apr 2016 #22
In the quote, he's only talking about the ones with super PACs. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #25
Well the DNC will be spreading around all that "dirty money" bettyellen Apr 2016 #29
He's not running against Dems in congress, he's running against Hillary. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #31
He has basically harshly judged everyone who participates in the current system, bettyellen Apr 2016 #32
It's not a "working relationship", it's a PAC. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #33
It is one of the best PACs out there. I can't easily stamp the words "evil establishment" on bettyellen Apr 2016 #34
He did not vilify them. But he did call their PAC part of the establishment. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #35
He outright dismissed them as being cronies. That kind of bitterness and dishonesty does not bettyellen Apr 2016 #38
re: "He outright dismissed them as being cronies." thesquanderer Apr 2016 #40
That's exactly what he means by "establishment". Instead of recognizing that they are a great bettyellen Apr 2016 #41
You are putting a lot of words into his mouth. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #42
Because "establishment". Dismissed her hard work as being "around". God forbid he acknowledge bettyellen Apr 2016 #43
Yes indeed! Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #17
no he is talking about conflict of interest GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #21
All the negative talking points about Bernie over the last day or so have been simplistic versions. bjo59 Apr 2016 #3
Simplistic people need simplistic versions Matt_in_STL Apr 2016 #23
Guess he should get Jeff Foxworthy (perfect name btw) to rework his lines bigbrother05 Apr 2016 #26
That's exactly the way they need to be spoonfed their information Matt_in_STL Apr 2016 #27
Many people here (including myself) are enamored with both candidates Dem2 Apr 2016 #36
They overreact to everything AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #4
He's fundraising off a false quote, not cool MattP Apr 2016 #5
No he's not ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #7
he sent out a fundraising email saying she said he was unqualified which is a bald faced lie MattP Apr 2016 #8
did he now? let's see it azurnoir Apr 2016 #9
She did say it through her campaign. #Truth ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #16
Of course it's not. It's how they spin his remarks. Nyan Apr 2016 #11
Noticed Rachel wasn't interested in the reasons, just starting a shit show WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #12
I don't watch. 840high Apr 2016 #13
Rachel is out to lunch. I no longer watch her show. ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #18
Don Lemon, too. grasswire Apr 2016 #20
Personally I like the way Camp Weather-Vane is characterizing the attack. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #14
"Foolish" is being too kind. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2016 #19
Woot! Go, Bernie. polly7 Apr 2016 #24
There's qualified and there's qualified LuckyTheDog Apr 2016 #28
I am glad to see the full quote -- Hell Hath No Fury Apr 2016 #30
Yeap, Sanders lied... she never said he was unqualified ... whatever uponit7771 Apr 2016 #37
Nothing he said is controversial. I agree with every word. Lots of people do. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #39
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
1. so basically, he is the only qualified person on the planet. because fundraising.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:11 AM
Apr 2016

he just marginalizes himself with this shit.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
6. I'm sure there are others on the planet who are equally as qualified as Bernie
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:18 AM
Apr 2016

but none who are currently running for President of the United States. He's uniquely qualified in that he has no taint and the only candidate running a campaign for the people. The other candidates are on the take.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
10. According to him, everyone running for congress this November is "on the take" with that
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:31 AM
Apr 2016

dirty money too. By his own standards, no one is pure enough.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
25. In the quote, he's only talking about the ones with super PACs.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:25 AM
Apr 2016

I don't know how many people in congress that applies to.

He also says that it makes you unqualified to be president. I guess, by extension, you could say he thinks it makes you unqualified to serve in congress as well, though he didn't say that.

But if you believe that super PACS are a source of corruption, replacing everyone who has a super PAC is not the only solution. You could also attack the problem from the other end by getting Citizens United overturned.

Regardless of any of that, I think most people can recognize campaign rhetoric when they hear it. He's making a rhetorical point about the two canidates' relative qualifications. If you compare the resumes, and look at what the Clinton team is saying about his qualifications (Is he really a democrat? Were his Daily News answers complete enough?), he wants you look at questions about her as well (Isn't she cozy with Wall Street? Didn't she vote for the Iraq war? Didn't she support bad trade deals?), and think about which set of "qualifying" questions is more telling.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
29. Well the DNC will be spreading around all that "dirty money"
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 01:27 PM
Apr 2016

To candidates who need it most nation wide.
So are they all tainted? Probably if they ever disagree with him- hints and allegations will arise I'm sure. How will anyone trust him after he's called out groups like Planned Parenthood?
There's an element of be for him or be dragged through the mud going on.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
31. He's not running against Dems in congress, he's running against Hillary.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:18 PM
Apr 2016

If by some chance Bernie gets the nomination, I would expect two things to happen: the party to rally around him as their nominee AND the nominee to support the candidates down ticket.

What's going on right now is the typical campaign rhetoric between two candidates--actually milder than most!--and will all be forgotten come the general.

Oh, and he has no beef with Planned Parenthood itself. However, they have a separate political arm, which is indeed part of the political establishment, as any lobbying group is, and they have endorsed Hillary. Personally, since BOTH candidates are GREAT for PP, I think they should have kept their powder dry and saved their efforts for the general, but so be it.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
32. He has basically harshly judged everyone who participates in the current system,
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:33 PM
Apr 2016

like it or not. Planned Parenthood endorsed Hillary because she went way beyond cosigning bills and saying the right thing a few time, she has accomplished much by actually putting herself on the line again and again. Having an established working relationship with PP is maligned as cronyism, and that is foolish and bitter.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
34. It is one of the best PACs out there. I can't easily stamp the words "evil establishment" on
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:46 PM
Apr 2016

people who I know to have been fighting the good fight for me al these years. That is where I part company with Bernie.
I think you can hate the system without trying to vilify everyone who has participated in it for the last fifty years.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
35. He did not vilify them. But he did call their PAC part of the establishment.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:06 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:07 PM - Edit history (1)

It's not an insult to PP. It's simply a fact. Their political arm, their lobbying group, which is what endorsed Hillary, is part of the political establishment. And so, maybe not so surprising that they endorsed the establishment candidate. I'd say that's not even vilification of the PAC, much less of PP itself.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
38. He outright dismissed them as being cronies. That kind of bitterness and dishonesty does not
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:15 PM
Apr 2016

impress me. He should have bit his lip and resisted the urge. He has not ever done any heavy lifting for PP, he doesn't get the endorsement. God forbid anyone be honest about Hillary's excellent record instead of chalking it up to "establishment" cronyism.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
40. re: "He outright dismissed them as being cronies."
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:30 PM
Apr 2016

I had never heard that, and a quick google search of [sanders planned parenthood crony] isn't turning up any such quotes. Might you have a link?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
41. That's exactly what he means by "establishment". Instead of recognizing that they are a great
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:34 PM
Apr 2016

organization who has done great work, he dismisses their endorsement as unimportant. Because relationships. That they were based on hard work and accomplishments doesn't seem to matter at all. Well, it does to lots of us.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
42. You are putting a lot of words into his mouth.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:43 PM
Apr 2016

So he didn't say "crony" -- rather, you say that's what he meant.

Similarly "he dismisses their endorsement as unimportant" -- I'm guessing you don't have a link for that one either?

Here is what he said when Maddow asked him about it:

“I would love to have the endorsement of every progressive organization,” Sanders said, pointing to the endorsements he has received. “I have friends and supporters in the human rights fund and Planned Parenthood. But you know what? Hillary Clinton has been around for a very, very long time. Some of these groups are, in fact, part of the establishment,” Sanders said.


Saying he'd love to have their endorsements doesn't sounds like he is dismissing the endorsements as unimportant. He is simply pointing out why Hillary may have an easier time getting them.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
43. Because "establishment". Dismissed her hard work as being "around". God forbid he acknowledge
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:58 PM
Apr 2016

that good working relationships can be a great thing.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
21. no he is talking about conflict of interest
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 05:07 AM
Apr 2016

If you have made $153 million off of Wall Street then you aren't qualified to be objective about how to avoid another 2007/08 crash. Simple.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
3. All the negative talking points about Bernie over the last day or so have been simplistic versions.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:12 AM
Apr 2016

Downright dishonest versions of what he actually said, in fact. That's the horror of the widely-watched/read corporate media: they can cherry pick what to throw out there - decontextualized, simplified, dishonest - and then bank on the fact that it will be spread far and wide. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. Manipulating perception is the name of the game. Grotesque.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
23. Simplistic people need simplistic versions
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 06:35 AM
Apr 2016

That is a group that lacks the basic understanding of nuance or, in many cases, politics in general. I am not sure many of them are qualified to be voters.

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
26. Guess he should get Jeff Foxworthy (perfect name btw) to rework his lines
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:42 AM
Apr 2016

"If you do ...X..., you just might be unqualified!" Maybe that would work better with the bumper sticker crowd and Faux News followers.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
27. That's exactly the way they need to be spoonfed their information
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:50 AM
Apr 2016

Except they need it to be tied into somehow making it sexist or racist even though there isn't a hint of it.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
36. Many people here (including myself) are enamored with both candidates
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:10 PM
Apr 2016

Are these people "qualified" to be voters?

Nyan

(1,192 posts)
11. Of course it's not. It's how they spin his remarks.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:32 AM
Apr 2016

It's just a story when Clinton says he's unqualified, but if he responds to it, it creates a "shock-wave."

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
14. Personally I like the way Camp Weather-Vane is characterizing the attack.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:53 AM
Apr 2016

When they are blatantly lying like this and the full quote is readily available like the part about the Panama Papers it makes them look very foolish indeed. And it makes Hillary look a whole lot less qualified.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
24. Woot! Go, Bernie.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 06:48 AM
Apr 2016

I am SO glad he's finally calling her out on her incompetence.

Fucking up the lives of millions and everything else she did deserves this MILD condemnation and much, much more.

This is the story of how a woman whose Senate vote for the Iraq war may have doomed her first presidential campaign nonetheless doubled down and pushed for military action in another Muslim country. As she once again seeks the White House, campaigning in part on her experience as the nation’s chief diplomat, an examination of the intervention she championed shows her at what was arguably her moment of greatest influence as secretary of state


http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511647122#post33




Iraq, Libya...... both great successes, if you're an investor in failed states. Meanwhile, small children wash up on beaches.

LuckyTheDog

(6,837 posts)
28. There's qualified and there's qualified
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 08:57 AM
Apr 2016

I don't think Bernie was suggesting Hillary would be incompetent. This was a criticism of some of her past decisions. #nuance

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
30. I am glad to see the full quote --
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 02:05 PM
Apr 2016

and I have to say, the reasons he gives are the exact reasons I would ever vote for Clinton.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
39. Nothing he said is controversial. I agree with every word. Lots of people do.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 03:21 PM
Apr 2016

It's kind of what this election is about. I suppose I'm glad to see Clinton supporters finally understanding that we're serious. This isn't some primary season game we're playing. Bernie Sanders and lots of other people have been warning that Hillary Clinton would be a disastrous choice for president. The only difference is that now, it's being couched in terms of qualifications. OK, fine. She's not qualified to be the President. Her dishonesty and right wing positions make this obvious. But there's nothing new here.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here's Bernie's full quot...