2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere's Bernie's full quote on Hillary not being qualified-not as simplistic as we're told
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)he just marginalizes himself with this shit.
jfern
(5,204 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)but none who are currently running for President of the United States. He's uniquely qualified in that he has no taint and the only candidate running a campaign for the people. The other candidates are on the take.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)dirty money too. By his own standards, no one is pure enough.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)it's that simple.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)I don't know how many people in congress that applies to.
He also says that it makes you unqualified to be president. I guess, by extension, you could say he thinks it makes you unqualified to serve in congress as well, though he didn't say that.
But if you believe that super PACS are a source of corruption, replacing everyone who has a super PAC is not the only solution. You could also attack the problem from the other end by getting Citizens United overturned.
Regardless of any of that, I think most people can recognize campaign rhetoric when they hear it. He's making a rhetorical point about the two canidates' relative qualifications. If you compare the resumes, and look at what the Clinton team is saying about his qualifications (Is he really a democrat? Were his Daily News answers complete enough?), he wants you look at questions about her as well (Isn't she cozy with Wall Street? Didn't she vote for the Iraq war? Didn't she support bad trade deals?), and think about which set of "qualifying" questions is more telling.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)To candidates who need it most nation wide.
So are they all tainted? Probably if they ever disagree with him- hints and allegations will arise I'm sure. How will anyone trust him after he's called out groups like Planned Parenthood?
There's an element of be for him or be dragged through the mud going on.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)If by some chance Bernie gets the nomination, I would expect two things to happen: the party to rally around him as their nominee AND the nominee to support the candidates down ticket.
What's going on right now is the typical campaign rhetoric between two candidates--actually milder than most!--and will all be forgotten come the general.
Oh, and he has no beef with Planned Parenthood itself. However, they have a separate political arm, which is indeed part of the political establishment, as any lobbying group is, and they have endorsed Hillary. Personally, since BOTH candidates are GREAT for PP, I think they should have kept their powder dry and saved their efforts for the general, but so be it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)like it or not. Planned Parenthood endorsed Hillary because she went way beyond cosigning bills and saying the right thing a few time, she has accomplished much by actually putting herself on the line again and again. Having an established working relationship with PP is maligned as cronyism, and that is foolish and bitter.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)"Planned Parenthood Action Fund Political Action Committee"
https://plannedparenthoodaction.org/about-us
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)people who I know to have been fighting the good fight for me al these years. That is where I part company with Bernie.
I think you can hate the system without trying to vilify everyone who has participated in it for the last fifty years.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 7, 2016, 04:07 PM - Edit history (1)
It's not an insult to PP. It's simply a fact. Their political arm, their lobbying group, which is what endorsed Hillary, is part of the political establishment. And so, maybe not so surprising that they endorsed the establishment candidate. I'd say that's not even vilification of the PAC, much less of PP itself.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)impress me. He should have bit his lip and resisted the urge. He has not ever done any heavy lifting for PP, he doesn't get the endorsement. God forbid anyone be honest about Hillary's excellent record instead of chalking it up to "establishment" cronyism.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)I had never heard that, and a quick google search of [sanders planned parenthood crony] isn't turning up any such quotes. Might you have a link?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)organization who has done great work, he dismisses their endorsement as unimportant. Because relationships. That they were based on hard work and accomplishments doesn't seem to matter at all. Well, it does to lots of us.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)So he didn't say "crony" -- rather, you say that's what he meant.
Similarly "he dismisses their endorsement as unimportant" -- I'm guessing you don't have a link for that one either?
Here is what he said when Maddow asked him about it:
Saying he'd love to have their endorsements doesn't sounds like he is dismissing the endorsements as unimportant. He is simply pointing out why Hillary may have an easier time getting them.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)that good working relationships can be a great thing.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)If you have made $153 million off of Wall Street then you aren't qualified to be objective about how to avoid another 2007/08 crash. Simple.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)Downright dishonest versions of what he actually said, in fact. That's the horror of the widely-watched/read corporate media: they can cherry pick what to throw out there - decontextualized, simplified, dishonest - and then bank on the fact that it will be spread far and wide. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. Manipulating perception is the name of the game. Grotesque.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)That is a group that lacks the basic understanding of nuance or, in many cases, politics in general. I am not sure many of them are qualified to be voters.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)"If you do ...X..., you just might be unqualified!" Maybe that would work better with the bumper sticker crowd and Faux News followers.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Except they need it to be tied into somehow making it sexist or racist even though there isn't a hint of it.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Are these people "qualified" to be voters?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Hillary is running a 'Hair on fire!!' campaign.
MattP
(3,304 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Hillary campaign opened the door.
MattP
(3,304 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Nyan
(1,192 posts)It's just a story when Clinton says he's unqualified, but if he responds to it, it creates a "shock-wave."
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)Played just that first fragment, and then went off on a tear.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)When they are blatantly lying like this and the full quote is readily available like the part about the Panama Papers it makes them look very foolish indeed. And it makes Hillary look a whole lot less qualified.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
polly7
(20,582 posts)I am SO glad he's finally calling her out on her incompetence.
Fucking up the lives of millions and everything else she did deserves this MILD condemnation and much, much more.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511647122#post33
Iraq, Libya...... both great successes, if you're an investor in failed states. Meanwhile, small children wash up on beaches.
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)I don't think Bernie was suggesting Hillary would be incompetent. This was a criticism of some of her past decisions. #nuance
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)and I have to say, the reasons he gives are the exact reasons I would ever vote for Clinton.
uponit7771
(90,346 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)It's kind of what this election is about. I suppose I'm glad to see Clinton supporters finally understanding that we're serious. This isn't some primary season game we're playing. Bernie Sanders and lots of other people have been warning that Hillary Clinton would be a disastrous choice for president. The only difference is that now, it's being couched in terms of qualifications. OK, fine. She's not qualified to be the President. Her dishonesty and right wing positions make this obvious. But there's nothing new here.