Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

votesparks

(1,288 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:45 PM Apr 2016

The Problem With Hillary Clinton Isn’t Just Her Corporate Cash. It’s Her Corporate Worldview.



Clinton is uniquely unsuited to the epic task of confronting the fossil-fuel companies that profit from climate change.

By Naomi Klein

There aren’t a lot of certainties left in the US presidential race, but here’s one thing about which we can be absolutely sure: The Clinton camp really doesn’t like talking about fossil-fuel money. Last week, when a young Greenpeace campaigner challenged Hillary Clinton about taking money from fossil-fuel companies, the candidate accused the Bernie Sanders campaign of “lying” and declared herself “so sick” of it. As the exchange went viral, a succession of high-powered Clinton supporters pronounced that there was nothing to see here and that everyone should move along.

The very suggestion that taking this money could impact Clinton’s actions is “baseless and should stop,” according to California Senator Barbara Boxer. It’s “flat-out false,” “inappropriate,” and doesn’t “hold water,” declared New York Mayor Bill de Blasio. New York Times columnist Paul Krugman went so far as to issue “guidelines for good and bad behavior” for the Sanders camp. The first guideline? Cut out the “innuendo suggesting, without evidence, that Clinton is corrupt.”

That’s a whole lot of firepower to slap down a non-issue. So is it an issue or not?

First, some facts. Hillary Clinton’s campaign, including her Super PAC, has received a lot of money from the employees and registered lobbyists of fossil-fuel companies. There’s the much-cited $4.5 million that Greenpeace calculated, which includes bundling by lobbyists.


Full piece: http://www.thenation.com/article/the-problem-with-hillary-clinton-isnt-just-her-corporate-cash-its-her-corporate-worldview/
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Problem With Hillary Clinton Isn’t Just Her Corporate Cash. It’s Her Corporate Worldview. (Original Post) votesparks Apr 2016 OP
I have a very good friend who believes that this is the very last gasp of PatrickforO Apr 2016 #1
Thank you for posting! For the future of our 2cannan Apr 2016 #2

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
1. I have a very good friend who believes that this is the very last gasp of
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:51 PM
Apr 2016

the capitalist monster. It tried to consume everything and has nearly ruined our earth with its endless quest for the uttermost farthing of profit.

But people are seeing now that profit is a dirty word if it is the only consideration. We must rethink our economy around human need instead of human greed. I have no problem with people who have valuable jobs making a premium salary but NO, I repeat NO executive is worth $20 million a year. Or even $5 million, or $1 million a year. They just aren't - NOT when the childcare workers who are raising most of our kids are earning under $10/hour. That's bullshit and all of us know it.

Bernie's talking about redistribution of wealth, and I say he's goddamned right!

2cannan

(344 posts)
2. Thank you for posting! For the future of our
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:29 PM
Apr 2016

planet and all of the world's children, Bernie for president!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Problem With Hillary ...