2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders: Clinton not qualified to be President
Just now in Philadelphia.
Note that Hillary Clinton never said that about him.
Oh well. He can watch the convention from Vermont.
Never. Was. A. Democrat.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts).
First and foremost, a candidate for this office must be honest, there's no grey areas here.
And, this person should represent at least most of the traditions of the Democratic Party.
I think she's had a good run, got to hold a high office, and now it's time for the people to get a real Democrat in the white house.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)And she never said what he said in his "quote unquote" lie.
Real classy guy.
riversedge
(70,239 posts)Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)"I think he hadn't done his homework and he'd been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hadn't really studied or understood," Clinton said in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," just one day after losing the Wisconsin primary to Sanders, "and that does raise a lot of questions."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/06/clinton-questions-whether-sanders-is-qualified-to-be-president/
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)She said he hadn't done his homework for that bad interview he just had. But if he said that, that should piss off a lot of her supporters to get out and work harder...and contribute more.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)She needs to get out and refute this immediately.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)This is a coordinated attack on Bernie:
Washington Post: "Clinton questions whether Sanders is qualified to be president"
Polls in Wisconsin haven't even been closed for 24 hours, and we're already seeing the start of the Clinton campaign's full-on attack before the New York primary. We knew they were getting nervous, but candidly, we didn't think they would go this negative so quickly. We have to be ready for what comes next.
The media is going to go wild, but he is right - anyone who helped create, engages in, and seeks to strengthen a system of complete corruption based on legalized bribery is not qualified to be the People's leader.
This is the result of massive legalized corruption:
APRIL 18, 2014
Is America an Oligarchy?
...a new study concluding that rich people and organizations representing business interests have a powerful grip on U.S. government policy. After examining differences in public opinion across income groups on a wide variety of issues, the political scientists Martin Gilens, of Princeton, and Benjamin Page, of Northwestern, found that the preferences of rich people had a much bigger impact on subsequent policy decisions than the views of middle-income and poor Americans. Indeed, the opinions of lower-income groups, and the interest groups that represent them, appear to have little or no independent impact on policy....
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/is-america-an-oligarchy
The original study:
Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens
Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page
ABSTRACT
Each of four theoretical traditions in the study of American politicswhich can be characterized as theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy, Economic-Elite Domination, and two types of interest-group pluralism, Majoritarian Pluralism and Biased Pluralismoffers different predictions about which sets of actors have how much influence over public policy: average citizens; economic elites; and organized interest groups, mass-based or business-oriented.
A great deal of empirical research speaks to the policy influence of one or another set of actors, but until recently it has not been possible to test these contrasting theoretical predictions against each other within a single statistical model. We report on an effort to do so, using a unique data set that includes measures of the key variables for 1,779 policy issues.
Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.
The last paragraph of their findings:
"...Americas claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened."
oasis
(49,388 posts)What a disapointment it must be for his supporters.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)That's why he doesn't do it and why he is in this campaign.
Do you approve of a system that passes no legislation - zero - that isn't approved by special interests?
Do you approve of a system where rich donors control the levers of government?
oasis
(49,388 posts)Now he will have to explain to a shocked voter base why he is not just like any other "politician".
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)http://www.inquisitr.com/2968811/clintons-new-strategy-for-sanders-disqualify-him-defeat-him-unify-party-later/
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Who presented this as the word of Hillary, the link certainly doesn't claim that - it quotes a WINGNUT source "newbusters" - that's a very poor source for reliable information.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)Kos
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/6/1511446/-Clinton-s-Next-Strategy-Slash-and-Burn-Then-Worry-About-Party-Unity-Later
WHOTV-NBC 13
http://whotv.com/2016/04/06/clinton-plan-defeat-sanders-then-unify-democratic-party/
inquistr
http://www.inquisitr.com/2968811/clintons-new-strategy-for-sanders-disqualify-him-defeat-him-unify-party-later/
reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4dnnjg/new_low_email_from_the_campaign/
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Nothing new there, please help me a find the para where Hillary clams she plans to "disqualify" Bernie. The articles provide 2nd hand information initiated by that same newbusters troll.
DFab420
(2,466 posts)"I think he hadn't done his homework and he'd been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hadn't really studied or understood," Clinton said in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," just one day after losing the Wisconsin primary to Sanders, "and that does raise a lot of questions."
Dem2
(8,168 posts)She's not claiming that she's attempting to "disqualify" him, it's just normal criticism one expects on a daily basis.
DFab420
(2,466 posts)As Sanders took a victory lap following a 14-point triumph in Wisconsin, Clinton took fresh aim at the Vermont senator as part of a three-part strategy before the New York primary on April 19: Disqualify him, defeat him, and unify the party later.
"Some of his ideas just won't work because the numbers don't add up," Clinton told a labor union audience Wednesday in Philadelphia. "In a number of important areas, he doesn't have a plan at all."
It's the latest chapter in Clinton's approach to Sanders. She's tried ignoring him, brushing him aside, gently dismissing his policies. The Clinton campaign has refrained from going nuclear on Sanders, aides say, in large part to keep at least some good will alive in hopes of unifying the party at the end of the primary fight.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I just want to see where she said that.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Apparently know we are pretending the editorial words WAPO wrote Clinton said.
More made up shit.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)And his judgment; and she questioned that his ability to understand his own policy ideas.
He responded in kind.
She suggested quite a lot about his judgment and character.
He blasted her back. This is a heated political cat fight and you're hung up on semantics?
Weird.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)His direct statement about her being qualified might be considered by some to be excessive, though I could care less what either candidate says - the Democrats are ultra-mild compared to the insanity of the Republicans; it's the voters who can decide if they think either candidate has gone too far.
George II
(67,782 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and her surrogates trashed him all day long. Hillary even said that he wasn't a Democrat.
Who cares what she did or didn't say? His main point was that SHE is unqualified. And he laid out two very good reasons--her Iraq War vote and her corrupt corporate campaign funds from Wall Street and other powerful interests.
Hillary mouthpieces are desperate to take the focus off of Bernie's very accurate words.
Let's keep it going Bernie! We've got about 2,000 more reasons to go!
George II
(67,782 posts)....be helpful to know exactly HOW she trashed him.
Just saying it happened doesn't do that.
Until someone can come up with what she said the only conclusion people can draw is that it didn't happen.
And that's precisely it - IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)spent the entire day trashing Bernie
Bernie responded.
The only people who are sooooo concerned about semantics, are the Hillary people who are making much ado about nothing.
No one is impressed. You guys and your faux outrage are hilarious.
Bernie responded by saying that Clinton is unqualified. He gave to very appropriate reasons. I hope he gives more.
George II
(67,782 posts)Bye bye.
George II
(67,782 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)"I think he hadn't done his homework and he'd been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hadn't really studied or understood," Clinton said in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," just one day after losing the Wisconsin primary to Sanders, "and that does raise a lot of questions."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/06/clinton-questions-whether-sanders-is-qualified-to-be-president/
Dem2
(8,168 posts)You can interpret any way you want, but she never said the word "disqualify".
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Communication occurs at many levels where words and they way they are used have very real meanings.
If you haven't yet achieved the breadth of knowledge, experience and understanding in English of a typical 8 year old you might want to investigate either an English-as-a-second-language course or perhaps a course in applied linguistics.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Jeff Zeleny: they're running out of patience. So they're going to begin deploying a new strategy. It's going to be called: "Disqualify Him, Defeat Him" I'm told, beginning here in the New York primary in two weeks on his gun record, on other things.
and:
The quote quickly made its way to Reddit and to the Sanders campaign, which sent out an email warning of the coming storm.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/2968811/clintons-new-strategy-for-sanders-disqualify-him-defeat-him-unify-party-later/#EkC18dsyicSmiSKG.99
So Bernie's campaign ran with an unsourced statement by Jeff Zeleny on CNN.
Oh, and thanks for the ad hominem attack. I assume you're mad because you can't find a quote from Hillary, I don't think it exists. Sorry.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)riversedge
(70,239 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)Less than 12 hours before this interview the goal to "disqualify" him was articulated by her campaign.
The Washington Post:
"I think he hadn't done his homework and he'd been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hadn't really studied or understood," Clinton said in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," just one day after losing the Wisconsin primary to Sanders, "and that does raise a lot of questions."
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)monmouth4
(9,708 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)He said she's not qualified since she raised money the traditional way.
Is this how a candidate is now "qualified" to run?
monmouth4
(9,708 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)There's a difference between thinking she should raise money as he (Bernie) has, but that doesn't disqualify her from running, does it?
riversedge
(70,239 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)The Constitution gives three eligibility requirements to be president: one must be 35 years of age, a resident "within the United States" for 14 years, and a "natural born Citizen," a term not defined in the Constitution
Let me know which one of those Clinton doesn't meet.
amborin
(16,631 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Bernie certainly is qualified by virtue of his near flawless history in public office coupled with honesty and demonstrated quality objective judgement.
synergie
(1,901 posts)his resume against hers proves she's far more qualified than he is. There are no gray areas here, he's just proved just how clearly dishonest, incorrect and clueless he truly is. All that negativity and the clear lies show he's doesn't represent the party he just joined and seems gleefully determined to destroy.
Yes, he's had a run, got to experience some cash and someone finally paying attention to him so, yes, the people are vociferously supporting the REAL Democrat for the White House, it's why he's not pretending not to violate his "principles" and going full on negative here and real Dems and real Progressives are not impressed.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)You're too funny with "got to experience some cash" comment.
Look, a person can have years and years as, say, a teacher and principal and thus be said to be very qualified by their resume.
But if they've been naughty in the neighborhood but never quite caught and most of the parents think that the person is dishonest, then that person really isn't qualified to be the next school superintendent.
In our opinion, Hillary is disqualified in these ways, dishonesty and shady dealings.
Toast.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Oh man what a weird planet you live on...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Reply #13)
Name removed Message auto-removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Vermont where he belongs.
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #40)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Tried three different ways to get that very headline out of her in fact and the only thing she said was he didn't do his homework. Pretty dumb move by a thin-skinned Bernie. This is how your negatives go up.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)NY Democrats will not like this at all.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Just add hot water bullshit.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)This really will not go over well here. Other states I can't speak to but Democrats don't like Democrat on Democrat violence. He might not be a dem but he is running in the party and this will not go over well.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)She did not.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)If Hillary's Super Pac's and mouthpieces throw enough mud at Bernie some of it will stick .... so they hope.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Let the desperate mud slinging and swiftboating by Bernie begin!
Seems like his is making things up as he goes. Guess he is taking the low road now instead of the high road. Devine and Weaver must be so proud of him now!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)This primary is really making me unmotivated... Both candidates have done things I'm not happy with.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'd check that.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Context is everything.
Oh and love the new found-purity of Hillary supporters!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)NO one in their right mind would say that Bernie Sanders was never a Democrat. Of course, he is. What makes this laughable is how silly you must think we all are.
Get a grip.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Response to asuhornets (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)JanetLovesObama
(548 posts)mental health this past month. I think the stress of this campaign has gotten to him. I cannot begin to fathom him as POTUS.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Response to JanetLovesObama (Reply #28)
Name removed Message auto-removed
dinkytron
(568 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)You want to see someone who is stressed out?
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)JanetLovesObama
(548 posts)qualified to be President. She said he is not a Democrat. He isn't. He jumped on the Democratic bandwagon just to run for President. He refuses to even donate a dime of his "big" cash haul to the Dem down ticket. Pitiful.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)bothers me. seems like he only cares about himself.
Response to DesertFlower (Reply #21)
Name removed Message auto-removed
babylonsister
(171,066 posts)Hes been talking for more than a year about doing things he, obviously, hadnt really studied or understood, and that does raise a lot of questions," Clinton said.
http://abcnewsradioonline.com/politics-news/hillary-clinton-questions-whether-bernie-sanders-is-a-democr.html
DebDoo
(319 posts)This is a weak attempt at criticism of Sanders.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)is the most qualified candidate of all.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Did you believe it was a game? For my part, I'm dead serious when I call her a corrupt liar, a criminal, and a world wrecker. My stance toward her candidacy is commensurate with how I feel. And no, I won't even try to resist saying that when I have a mind to.
So why would you assume that the proper impulse is to "resist"?
Seeinghope
(786 posts)He isn't a flip flopper. He didn't vote to go onto Iraq. He voted against the Patriot act.
Sanders did something particularly original, which was that he passed amendments that were exclusively progressive, advancing goals such as reducing poverty and helping the environment, and he was able to get bipartisan coalitions of Republicans who wanted to shrink government or hold it accountable and progressives who wanted to use it to empower Americans.
Corporate Crime Accountability (February 1995): A Sanders amendment to the Victims Justice Act of 1995 required offenders who are convicted of fraud and other white-collar crimes to give notice to victims and other persons in cases where there are multiple victims eligible to receive restitution.
Saving Money, for Colleges and Taxpayers (April 1998): In an amendment to H.R. 6, the Higher Education Amendments of 1998, Sanders made a change to the law that allowed the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education to make competitive grants available to colleges and universities that cooperated to reduce costs through joint purchases of goods and services.
Greening the U.S. Government (June 2007): A Sanders amendment made a change to the law so at least 30 percent of the hot water demand in newer federal buildings is provided through solar water heaters.
Protecting Our Troops (October 2007): Sanders used an amendment to win $10 million for operation and maintenance of the Army National Guard, which had been stretched thin and overextended by the war in Iraq.
Restricting the Bailout to Protect U.S. Workers (Feburary 2009): A Sanders amendment required the banking bailout to utilize stricter H-1B hiring standards to ensure bailout funds weren't used to displace American workers.
Helping Veterans' Kids (July 2009): A Sanders amendment required the Comptroller General to put together comprehensive reporting on financial assistance for child care available to parents in the Armed Forces.
Exposing Corruption in the Military-Industrial Complex (November 2012): A Sanders amendment required public availability of the database of senior Department officials seeking employment with defense contractors an important step toward transparency that revealed the corruption of the revolving door in action.
Support for Treating Autism in Military Health Care: Sanders worked with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) to pass an amendment by a vote of 66-29 ensuring that the military's TRICARE system would be able to treat autism.
As Senator
While Sanders was an amendment king who was able to bring bipartisan coalitions together to make serious changes to laws, he also knew how to be a thorn in the side of the establishment until it offered up something in return. Sanders was able to get the first-ever audit of funds given out by the Federal Reserve, which made transparent over $2 trillion of funds handed out by the secretive organization. This was a cause that Republican congressman Ron Paul (TX) had been pursuing for decades, but Sanders was able to get the votes to do it by forging a compromise that required an audit for the bailout period alone.
When the Affordable Care Act was in danger of not having the votes to pass, Sanders used his leverage to win enough funding for free health treatment for 10 million Americans through Community Health Centers. This gutsy moveholding out until the funds were put into the billhas even Republican members of Congress requesting the funds, which have helped millions of Americans who otherwise would not have access.
Another moment came when Sanders, who was then chair of the Veterans committee, worked with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), to overhaul the Veterans Administration. McCain praised Sanders' work on the bill in an interview with National Journal. Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) even went so far as to say the bill would never have passed without Sanders' ability to bring the parties to a
But Sanders has a theory of change, in order to be an executive who can pass progressive policy even in the face of a recalcitrant Congress. He frequently talks about a political revolution that means vastly increasing voter turnout and participation in political activities so conservative lawmakers and Big Money are unable to overwhelm public opinion. During the Democratic debate, this line had its doubters, from former Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) to a skeptical Anderson Cooper.
Sanders is probably not so unsure of himself. After all, he's done it before. When Sanders was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, one of his big accomplishments was to increase civic life in the city. During the course of his terms, voter turnout doubled. In his eight years as mayor, he rejuvenated a city that was considered by many to be dying, laying out progressive policies that cities around the country later adopted, and he did all this without particularly alienating Republicans. As one former GOP Alderman noted, he implemented ideas from the Republican party that he felt were not particularly harmful to working people, such as more efficient accounting practices.
It's easy for the establishment media and politicians to make the assumption that Bernie Sanders is not an effective lawmaker or executive. He has strong convictions and he stands by them, and we're often told that makes one a gadflysomeone who is out to make a point rather than make an actual change. But with Sanders we have the fusion of strong principles and the ability to forge odd bedfellow coalitions that accomplish historic things, like the audit of the Federal Reserve or the rejuvenation of Burlington that has served as a model for cities around the country. Don't underestimate me, Sanders said at the beginning of the race, words that anyone who knows his political and policy history take to heart.
frylock
(34,825 posts)FIFY
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's not even a matter of who you like in this race, Sanders comes off as extremely unprepared.
amborin
(16,631 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)I based my opinion on what I read with my own eyes and that was what came out of Bernie Sanders own damn mouth. Clinton couldn't make him screw up in that interview.
TheBlackAdder
(28,205 posts).
Reading some of the posts, it looks like the children have taken over the school.
.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Context is everything.
choie
(4,111 posts)he is THE Democrat in this race. His policies are Democratic. No matter how many times and how loudly you say he "never was a Democrat" the truth remains - he's more of a Democrat than Clinton ever was or ever will be.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He's a party of one.
choie
(4,111 posts)the policies that he's promoting will help US - he has US in mind and you're right, Clinton is a team player - as long as the team is a corporation.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)choie
(4,111 posts)dflprincess
(28,079 posts)and the only team they've played for is their own because they care more about their own ambitions than anything else.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)if not hundreds of Democrats. Bernie never lifted a finger to get a single progressive elected.
Vanity candidate. Just like his buddy Nader.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)regime change? Fracking? Tar sands? bankruptcy bills? free trade agreements? lobbying to keep minimum wage lower in other nations? Failure to fight for our minimum wage increases. If that's the team you so highly adore, you don't have a democratic team you have a conservative team. Not interested in being part of a team like that.
frylock
(34,825 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)When he thought about running for POTUS. He's a fraud
Jackilope
(819 posts)HRC is a weather vane and will say or do anything to get to nomination. If elected, we will have plenty of war, we can kiss the hope of single payer Medicare for all goodbye, TPP will get ushered in at our peril, Wall St. and big banks will have less regulation and continue to put all of us at risk over another tragic economic meltdown.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Which anyone could have listened to like I did. He said (and I'm paraphrasing because I was listening and not typing) I don't think she is qualified based on ... Then he listed things like support of disastrous trade agreements, supporting Panama trade agreement, voting for the Iraq War, taking millions of dollars from special interests, etc.
Went over really well with the more than 10,000 people in the audience.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Maybe he can ask her to get some coffee for him.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)someone else.
She is not a victim. She is a candidate. So is Sanders. The people in that audience preferred Sanders and believe he is more qualified. End of story.
How about you just support your candidate?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)That is what Birthers said about Obama.
He is going to pay for those remarks here.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)So I'd say she is saying so.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)What is the definition of disqualify?
dis·qual·i·fy
disˈkwäləˌfī/Submit
verb
pronounce (someone) ineligible for an office or activity because of an offense or infringement.
"he was disqualified from driving for six months"
synonyms: banned, barred, debarred; ineligible
"the disqualified entrants included a girl who had lied about her age"
eliminate (someone) from a competition because of an infringement of the rules.
"he was disqualified after failing a drug test"
(of a feature or characteristic) make (someone) unsuitable for an office or activity.
"a heart murmur disqualified him for military service"
To have as a campaign strategy the goal to disqualify your opponent in the minds of the voters is to attempt to render the candidate unqualified which means not qualified.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Did someone advise him Hillary had said he was not qualified because if he was advised incorrectly and an apology is needed for false information.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton on Wednesday questioned whether her rival in the Democratic presidential primary, Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.), is qualified to be president.
"I think he hadn't done his homework and he'd been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hadn't really studied or understood," Clinton said in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," just one day after losing the Wisconsin primary to Sanders, "and that does raise a lot of questions."
Clinton's comments follow a New York Daily News interview with Sanders that critics say revealed his inability to explain specifically how he would accomplish goals such as breaking up the biggest banks.
<Sanders details process for breaking up banks following criticism over New York Daily News interview>
more...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)To say she said it is blatantly false.
Your candidate just committed career suicide tonight.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And there is no quote of her saying it.
There is video of him saying it, and that video isn't going to help with any unity of the party.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and CNN's sound yesterday does as well
She started this fight. You guys are reacting as I expected... I just expected it later. But this is 2008 all over again.
I hate root canals, but it is what it is...
And myself actually smiling at reading how this was going to go, albeit I expected it later.
She is betting all and working on burning the party to save it... so be it. When you play with fire in politics, the return fire might be just as hot.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm ready to support the candidate whomever that is, I'm not holding my vote "hostage".
Can you say the same?
The important election is the GE.
Bernie said it, Hillary has not, FWIW she won't say it. They are both qualified candidates, now how about we just let the people vote. His comment was out of line.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)as an independent voter I really do not care who your party nominates. And I have told you this a few times, But you guys... I mean HRC supporters, I said I could not wait for the GE... well it seems I get to see this earlier.
For the record, I cover this shit... and this year somebody promised me a boring primary... turns out it is nothing of the sort.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I believe that...
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but her campaign declared war on the weak old guy last night, and they got a response they were not expecting and now we will see (like 2008) the victim card.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)are all of a sudden "independents" because it sounds cool. It looks very disingenuous.
Response to R B Garr (Reply #178)
Post removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I actually didn't even see the reply... But wow.
That escalated quickly.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)This started immediately after the BLM protests when they interrupted Bernie twice. She has a much different story about BLM now that they have targeted other politicians, as well. Can't say too much more because of alerts.
And there's her tedious vendetta about 2008. It gets really old to see a phony narrative prolonged as if there's some big story there instead of just beating a dead horse. So that looks like why it escalates. I usually try to avoid her, but I like geeks threads. Thanks for your post. You always add a lot to the threads.
Cha
(297,275 posts)All they have are insults and they think they're clever.. all it does is show what they're like and nothing about their target.
They really need to stop projecting all the time.
Mahalo for bringing substance to any thread.
Cary
(11,746 posts)I have heard it both ways. Some say the release of KKKarl Rove talking points by alleged liberals will be good for the Party, bringing in new voters. Others say that the radicals are taking us on the same path that radical "conservatives" are taking the Republicans, thus negating the huge advantage that we should have as a result.
I would think the prospect of any "conservative" let alone an ego maniac like Trump being president would scare the living bajeezers out of emotional progressives.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)they wouldn't have 150,000 posts
if it didn't fit my mold of the political discussion i wanted, i would find something like the independent underground
but that is just me. i don't spend my time on conservative forums, i don't wish to constantly debate
Cary
(11,746 posts)You're not making any sense.
DebDoo
(319 posts)http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/06/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-democrats-unity/index.html
"New York (CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign is taking new steps to try and disqualify Bernie Sanders in the eyes of Democratic voters, hoping to extinguish the argument that he is an electable alternative for the party's presidential nomination."
Disqualify
verb (used with object), disqualified, disqualifying.
1.
to deprive of qualification or fitness;render unfit; incapacitate
jillan
(39,451 posts)You play with backfire, you're gonna get berned.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)for President ever that she's not qualified.
Stupid attempt at a dog whistle that will backfire.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)he has ever experienced.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)face time in front of the cameras.
Up to him to capitalize on it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)"Has Bernie Sanders lost his damn mind?"
Lots of professional women in NY.
tgards79
(1,415 posts)I really believe he is just running out of gas, a tired old man. Like The Daily News interview.
Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
riversedge
(70,239 posts)innuendos and you love it.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Hillary has been saying Bernie is not a real Democrat for a while now, and the latest attacks about his knowledge are just the usual sliming native to her campaign.
Bernie turned it around to remind people that Hillary is in the pocket of the 1%
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)not real Democrat in that? Sounds FDR like to me.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He's going to have prominent women in NY and PA ripping him for calling Hillary Clinton "not qualified."
He may get 30% of the women's vote here.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)To jump in on this one. They all must be on speed dial from fearless leader!
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)This is what you wanted, right? They pull a knife, you pull a gun.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Clinton has been mucking about in the shit since jump.
amborin
(16,631 posts)and last night announced she was going to attack; people with corrupt pasts are fair game
Jarqui
(10,126 posts)Hillary Clinton's campaign is taking new steps to try and disqualify Bernie Sanders ...
As Sanders took a victory lap following a 14-point triumph in Wisconsin, Clinton took fresh aim at the Vermont senator as part of a three-part strategy before the New York primary on April 19: Disqualify him, defeat him, and unify the party later.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)The Sanders Campaign: Endless Amateur Hour
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)He sounds beyond desperate.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)and even here in the United States. She laughed like a psychopath when asked about launching a first strike nuclear attack against other countries, and when she heard about Qaddafi being lynched. She said the US had given Iraqis the greatest gift, the gift of freedom, after we had bombed and destroyed their whole country and millions of lives had been destroyed, based on lies. There's something very wrong with her. A couple years later she was calling it an opportunity for corporations to make fat profits. She's done enough damage now she ought to step aside.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)I have heard recently in NY if you are not on the attack, you are on the defensive.
He won Wisconsin, but all the media narrative is him defending himself on multiple fronts. He has to stay on the attack.
beedle
(1,235 posts)She played it as though it was Sanders that started this, when Sanders is responding to Hillary fwho started this crap this morning on Morning Joe syaing he wasn't even a Democrat "Hes a relatively new Democrat, and, in fact, Im not even sure he is one. " ... Like she wasn't sure Obama was Christian wither.
Fuck you Maddow, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt as jus tplaying 'devil's advocate', but this went way over the line.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Outlining the reasons he says she isn't qualified with the statement:
Hillary Clinton has said , I'm not qualified. Well let me tell you .., (I paraphrased)
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)They tried to bait her and she didn't.
And then the angry demagogue threw his temper tantrum.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)It's time to drop the hammer on Sanders. Squash him like a bug.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Great theater, with so much at stake, still to come.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)patronizing old sexist tomorrow by local figures here.
Will be fun to watch his supporters' hope die this month.
Cheers!
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Cheers!
Bodhi BloodWave
(2,346 posts)says quite a lot about you, and none of it good.
Addendum: Used enjoy in the title since if you are having fun with something you are enjoying it, just incase its claimed the poster never used the word enjoy.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)I don't think he should have said that. I disagree with her positions on a whole lot of things, but she's qualified. She's seen what it's like to be President, up close and personal, for eight years and was a senator and then Secretary of State.
I love Bernie to pieces but I have to disagree with him on this. I am not a fan of hers, but she's as qualified as anyone else and then some.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)Enough is enough.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)relevance
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Just because people will trot out the very few qualifications someone must have to be President of the United States. Most people in this country are qualified by those rules, but very few are fit for the job.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)this is basic politics... I am sure she will play the victim soon though and I mean that, She did the same with Obama when Obama threw it in her face.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)This is going to cost him in NY. Those who were not his adoring worshippers will be appalled.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and she added the cherry on top when she laughed at his supporters.
She did the exact same thing in 2008... it will be fun (like a root canal) to watch the next two weeks.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)he wasn't qualified.
He's the one who went there. Against a more qualified woman.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and her campaign is also going full in with a disqualify and destroy campaign. This was on CNN's air last night
Disqualify Bernie, defeat our movement, and pick up the pieces later. That's their new strategy.
This might work with your friends, but we are not idiots. When you play with fire, don't be too surprised when the other side does as well.
Until now the Bernie campaign had been very nice, all things considered. I read this as this is over, and yes, the Clinton campaign started it.
And try to justify this.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/david-axelrod-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-221620#ixzz456VQ5JvW
And by the way, Sanders has been very critical of dubya as well.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Just for example. It took two seconds.
Sow the wind... and as I said, this will be as fun as a root canal. At least these days they use anesthesia. But to those of us who watch polticsl for a living... this is hardly surprising.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)No one is claiming a direct quote, and we're not in the second grade. Deal with this one as an adult, and don't dishonestly feign ignorance to try to win a point. You didn't win it, and everyone sees through it anyway.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I was hoping he could honor his pledge to not go negative. I guess it was too much to hope for.
I'd still vote for him if he gets the nom, but it would not be enthusiastic support.
Very disappointed in him.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)He could not afford any mistakes - certainly not something this big. Such as negative HRC comments hurt her, this will - and should - hurt him. The difference is that she had the space and lead to make many mistakes - and she did - without still being the most likely to win.
Not to mention, here, he gives up the biggest asset he had - that he was running a positive campaign.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Long Island.
Moronic. His fans cheering it on don't realize what he just did to himself.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)Second, 95% of voter probably will never know about this drama.
So, of the 5% remaining, only the Hillary supporters care, Sanders supporters are unmoved.
Impact on votes received = null.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)My perspective is based on having grown up in Indiana.
I have been mystified at some nastier than needed Clinton comments. I think that many of them did hurt her favorable numbers. However, she always had the luxury that she could make some errors. I think that Bernie, had he run the more inspiration, well executed campaign ever seen (run by at best untried campaign people), it would have been a super long shot. That he has done as well as he has reflects a combination of a very disgruntled population, many Clinton missteps and him being progressively seen as a reasonable alternative.
Gothmog
(145,291 posts)Sanders will have zero chance of being the nominee now unless he wins by pledged delegates only.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)The Midway Rebel
(2,191 posts)I don't get it.
MFM008
(19,814 posts)We have 2 candidates in a pissing contest and yelling at clouds.
Terrific. Good thing I'm about a half hour from the Canadian border, will make it easy when Cruz or Trump takes over.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Sanders in Philly: "She thinks I'm not quote un quote qualified to be pres. Let me just say in response, I don't believe she is qualified."
Just now in Philadelphia.
Note that Hillary Clinton never said that about him.
Oh well. He can watch the convention from Vermont.
Never. Was. A. Democrat.
I am amazed no one else has mentioned it yet, but it took me three reads, your double negative makes it saying she said he is qualified. You may want to switch that unless she did say that. Also there is a qoute"quote button that would make it easier to read.
As for the news I hope this does not turn in to baseless critiques back and forth, the point of this process is to vet the candidates, playing with gloves on seems cheap...but still keep it above the belt.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)But yes "quote unquote" would make wayyyy more send than "quote un qoute". (<- meta) Spaces mean something! Like I said I was reading it after a very long day of data entry, translations, and such...that extra space did not work in my coding mind, it threw an "unexpected error". One wants one's quotes.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Unqualified. He said her judgement makes her unqualified. Same thing I say about her. It's no different than her saying he was unqualified because he didn't know how to break up the banks. Except in her case, he does know how. And in his case, she does have lousy judgement.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Saying someone isn't qualified for the office is what they say about Trump.
No one outside of his adoring fans is defending this. A lot of supporters do realize how bad this is.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)It can't be unsaid. It's the kind of thing the Never Trump crowd says about the Don.
Looks like you were right about the contested convention. Looks like he wants to be a loser for an extra month.
I expect him to go after the emails issue within a week.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Clinton is clearly not qualified.
Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
Post removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)if they meant abandoning Brooklyn during the height of the white flight era, or whether it's anti-semitic.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I got screenshots of other sites. So are you testing it on the old DU?
Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Actual Democrats and those not motivated by intense personal hatred know she is.
We're going to stomp him so hard in NY. Gonna be fun to watch him lose and lose and lose.
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #194)
Name removed Message auto-removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bernie has broadcast his decision to go Nader.
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #199)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Response to Agschmid (Reply #207)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)So don't take cues based off the rest of us.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He can't win.
Maybe he'll just lose and then shut up and slink back to Vermont. That's probably the best case scenario.
Marr
(20,317 posts)"Go Nader"?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I disagree that she views welfare recipients as deadbeats, I disagree with her friendship with Saudi Arabia and her decision to sell them 10 million dollars of weaponry.
I disagree with her position on fracking. I disagree with her position on "free" trade.
Plainly. I disagree with her on issues that are important to me/
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Mitt Romney was qualified. Bob Dole was qualified. Jeb Bush was qualified.
Dennis Kucinich was qualified.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)on issues.
Apparently, disagreeing on issues, according to you, makes a person a hater.
To me, that is a remarkably simple minded binary thinking.
It's as if we are all school yard 3 year olds and cannot embrace nuance or complex issues.
Few here actually hate Bernie and few here actually hate Hillary.
And what a bizarre notion that anyone would make that conclusion solely based on the opposition to their preferred candidate's positions.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)election history is not qualified, they are not judging her on qualifications.
When they say she is as dangerous as Trump, they are not looking at policy.
When they call her a corrupt, monstrous baby killer, that is not a policy discussion.
And half this forum hates her.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)response, which is
you disagree with her, ergo, you hate her.
What an infantile approach to political discussion.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)still qualified for the office.
Bernie thinks Clinton isn't qualified for the office. Either he's a sexist or he thinks he's the only qualified candidate in US history, since he's the only one who doesn't have policy differences with Bernie Sanders.
which interpretation do you think is less frightening?
P.S. According to the issues he cited, Donald Trump and Pat Buchanan are more qualified than Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)constitution while seeking to take the pledge saying you will.
vimeo.com/148092658
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Reply #205)
Name removed Message auto-removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I can't tell.
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #222)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Because you clearly don't understand it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)And someone said Skinner is Karl Rove just yesterday.
The 22nd Amendment does not apply to the President's spouse. To say it does is amazingly bonkers.
I just can't ...
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #229)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Response to Agschmid (Reply #237)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It would be more interesting if you would just say who you were previously.
It's alright we all get nine lives around here.
Response to Agschmid (Reply #240)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)25th Amendment:
Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.
Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.[3]
Acting President is when the President is unable to perform their duties, such as illness, but still holds the Office.
Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #227)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)And the 25th clearly defined what acting means since it was considered vague in the mid-20th Century. Because it is well defined (Since 1967), your post saying Hillary was acting scored an 9.2/10 on the ROTFLMAO meter.
Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #234)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)If you couldn't read that, a visit to the optometrist is probably in order. Staring at PC screens does do a number on one's eyes.
A looksie at Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 would probably help too:
Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #241)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Try reading what you just wrote again.
Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #248)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)You quoted a piece of that document completely out of context and tried to apply a pop-culture view. The first lady is not eligible to act as President under the Constitution. Your argument has met with calamity.
There are only 2 possible outcomes remaining:
1. You are unable to acknowledge that you were wrong and will continue to argue the abstract to avoid facing it.
or,
2. You are so dense you could serve as nuclear reactor shielding.
Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #250)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I'm a science guy. The facts prevail, even if intermingled with contemptuous language
Thatcher was also discussing political philosophy debate and not arguments over discrete facts. Given the human trends towards The Backfire Effect and Invincible Ignorance Fallacy, frustration is common and normal.
Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #253)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)You must also think Obama is unqualified since he fails St. Bernard's tests of qualification
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)a dead heat.
45% is his ceiling here and he'll be lucky to hot that after the poison he just belched in Philly.
timlot
(456 posts)Hillary is going to be the nominee.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Washington (CNN) Bernie Sanders said Wednesday that Hillary Clinton is not "qualified" to be president, a sharp escalation in rhetoric in the Democratic primary.
"Secretary Clinton appears to be getting a little bit nervous," he told a crowd in Philadelphia. "And she has been saying lately that she thinks that I am 'not qualified' to be president. Well, let me, let me just say in response to Secretary Clinton: I don't believe that she is qualified, if she is, through her super PAC, taking tens of millions of dollars in special interest funds. I don't think that you are qualified if you get $15 million from Wall Street through your super PAC."
CNN has reached out to the Clinton campaign for comment, and its surrogates responded quickly on Twitter.
"Hillary Clinton did not say Bernie Sanders was 'not qualified.' But he has now - absurdly - said it about her. This is a new low," campaign spokesman Brian Fallon tweeted.
Clinton was asked Wednesday morning by MSNBC whether she thought Sanders was "ready to be president."
"I think he hadn't done his homework and he'd been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hadn't really studied or understood, and that does raise a lot of questions," Clinton said. "Really what that goes to is for voters to ask themselves can he deliver what he's talking about."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/06/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-qualified/index.html
Hillary was talking about Sanders over promising on things that he wouldn't be able to deliver, given the reality on the ground. She never said that he was unqualified. I shouldn't be surprised that a man who was never a Democrat until he decided to use the party for his own purposes, has no compunction in tarnishing the party's probable nominee.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)dchill
(38,502 posts)And 23 recs.
Thread fail.
Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
LexVegas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)from FDR and JFK. Hillary doesn't.
Instead, she and her husband has worked to tear down what FDR have established.
Reasons why Hillary is not qualified.
I dont believe that she is qualified if she is through her super PAC taking tens of millions of dollars in special-interest funds.
I dont think that you are qualified if you get $15 million from Wall Street through your super PAC.
I dont think you are qualified if you voted for the disastrous war in Iraq.
I dont think youre qualified if you supported almost every disastrous trade agreement.
I dont think you are qualified if you supported the Panama free trade agreement, something I very strongly opposed, which has given the green light to wealthy people and corporations all over the world to avoid paying taxes owed to their countries.
He is right on every single account.
On another note: Bernie has brought hundreds of thousands if not millions of NEW VOTERS to the party. Talk about establishment Hillary loyalists being ungrateful.
Joob
(1,065 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)than Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton?
Because Trump and Buchanan pass Bernie's qualification test with flying colors.
Obama and Clinton flunk it.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)that strawman has to do with the issue at hand.
It must be the Daily "News" kool aid trickling down on the Hillary campaign.
Same kind of BS strawman.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)What makes Hillary qualified and Bernie not?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)She can articulate a rationale for her own positions, for another, as compared to Senator Didn't Do His Homework
Plus, she realizes that starting a trade war with the rest of the planet is actually a bad thing.
But, thanks for confirming you don't prefer Clinton to Trump. A very common occurrence amongst Sanders supporters, and apparently the candidate himself.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Yours and Hillary's disgusting lies has been taken down. So why repeat that lie?
She is not articulate, she is running away from questions and is playing you for a fool for thinking she's squeechy clean regarding money in politics.
And your other disgusting strawman is to link me to Trump when it's the Clinton's who have taken money from him.
Trumps last wedding had one presidential candidate as guest. It was not Bernie, and it was not Ted Cruz. It was Hillary. So if you want a republican in the WH, keep up your game. You seem to belong in that club who hates universal healthcare and loves money in politics.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)lining them up next to each other, setting them on fire, setting himself on fire, and jumping the flaming schoolbuses filled with sharks, while flaming.