Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:32 PM Apr 2016

Following Wisconsin, Hillary's popular vote lead has gone down

from 2.5 million to 2.4 million. Caucus states that do not report popular vote numbers are not included in those numbers. Iowa, for example, did not report any popular vote numbers, while Minnesota did. Some states do, and some states do not.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Following Wisconsin, Hillary's popular vote lead has gone down (Original Post) MineralMan Apr 2016 OP
and she has won 1 out of 199 counties.. grasswire Apr 2016 #1
How about all states that have voted? Why cherry-pick a number like "the last 6?" CalvinballPro Apr 2016 #3
The last six were the most recent. It shows the trend. morningfog Apr 2016 #7
Yes, OK. That matters MineralMan Apr 2016 #5
You don't count counties, but you compare vote totals when one Marr Apr 2016 #11
Unless you have actual vote counts for each county, MineralMan Apr 2016 #13
Yes, I know. I'm saying that comparing the number of counties won Marr Apr 2016 #18
Yeah, OK. I see what you're saying. MineralMan Apr 2016 #19
But Romney won more counties.... KingFlorez Apr 2016 #17
Ah--we have a match: Sanders spent $2.4 million to win Wisconsin riversedge Apr 2016 #2
every time they crow about the vote numbers we should remind them of this Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #4
I am interested in this 2.4/2.5 mil votes ahead. oldandhappy Apr 2016 #6
This is not the general election. MineralMan Apr 2016 #9
What percentage of the electorate has voted so far? Baobab Apr 2016 #8
59% or so of the pledged delegates have MineralMan Apr 2016 #10
I think you might have that backwards... 59% assigned so far, 41% to go. DanTex Apr 2016 #12
You are correct, sir. I misread the table. MineralMan Apr 2016 #14
Thank you- that is a really useful site- Bookmarked! Baobab Apr 2016 #15
Don't miss the individual state pages. MineralMan Apr 2016 #16
 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
3. How about all states that have voted? Why cherry-pick a number like "the last 6?"
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:37 PM
Apr 2016

Oh, right, because St Bernard's record is an embarrassment in the contests prior to the last 6, that's why.

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
5. Yes, OK. That matters
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:39 PM
Apr 2016

in those states, for sure, and affects how many delegates each candidate was allocated. Bernie Sanders has cut into Hillary's pledged delegate margin, too. It's down to about 215 now. Obviously, the wins by Sanders are reducing her lead in both areas.

I don't count counties, to tell you the truth. I count pledged delegates, primarily, and the popular vote as a secondary thing.

Delegates go to the convention. Counties do not.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
11. You don't count counties, but you compare vote totals when one
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:11 PM
Apr 2016

candidate has dominated caucuses.

Tallying counties is exactly the same kind of thing as touting total votes.

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
13. Unless you have actual vote counts for each county,
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016

it's really meaningless. A county is a boundaried area with a variable population. There are counties in most states with so few people that they are pretty much empty. There are other counties with populations in the millions. The two are not the same thing in any way.

So, no, I pay no attention to counties at all. Now, Congressional districts are quite another thing. They're set up to have roughly the same populations. They are also the unit that determines the delegate count in most states. IN most states, it is the vote in each congressional district that is used to allocate delegates from that district.

I've not seen a site that tracks the primary by congressional district, though. That would be very welcome, since it's material to delegate selection.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
18. Yes, I know. I'm saying that comparing the number of counties won
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:36 PM
Apr 2016

by a candidate to those of his/her competition is about as relevant as comparing the total number of votes received in a mixed system of primaries and caucuses. Win a caucus state and you're not gaining votes. The win represents plenty of voters, but not votes.

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
19. Yeah, OK. I see what you're saying.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:48 PM
Apr 2016

I'm in Minnesota, a caucus state that does report popular votes. But...less than 10% of registered voters turned out to the caucuses. Way less, actually. My precinct has about 2000 registered voters, and about 2/3 of those are Democrats. We had 57 people who voted at our precinct caucus. I know that because I'm the DFL precinct chair and chaired the caucus.

While I enjoy our caucus and convention system here, I'm working with many others to pass legislation to switch us to a primary election state for these elections. I'd like to see a higher participation in our primary process. I think that would give us a better sample of voter opinion.

riversedge

(70,299 posts)
2. Ah--we have a match: Sanders spent $2.4 million to win Wisconsin
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:36 PM
Apr 2016

This is early tweet--I think his delegates are up to 13 or 14 now.


Daily News Bin ?@DailyNewsBin 14h14 hours ago

Bernie Sanders spent $2.4 million to win Wisconsin, only came out six delegates ahead

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/bernie-sanders-spent-2-4-million-in-wisconsin-only-came-out-six-delegates-ahead/24373/
View summary
81 retweets 72 likes

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
4. every time they crow about the vote numbers we should remind them of this
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:39 PM
Apr 2016

Not that it will penetrate their bubbles at all, but those who still care about facts might notice.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
6. I am interested in this 2.4/2.5 mil votes ahead.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:40 PM
Apr 2016

Gore won the popular vote but lost the presidency. In the primary, the delegate count is more important than the popular vote. In the GE the electoral college counts for more than the popular vote. Soooooo? I am willing to learn, smile.

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
9. This is not the general election.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:55 PM
Apr 2016

Delegates are allocated by each state in proportion to the votes in primaries or caucuses. That's true only for the Democratic Party, though. The Republicans have some states that are winner-take-all.

If you look at the percentages of the popular vote and the delegate count for each candidate, you'll see that they are about the same. There are variations, but not large ones. By the convention, that will still hold true, pretty much, as you'll be able to see at that time. You can see such numbers easily in the table at the link below, if you're interested in following them:

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
8. What percentage of the electorate has voted so far?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:44 PM
Apr 2016

Seems like many of the biggest states are still ahead.

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
10. 59% or so of the pledged delegates have
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 12:59 PM
Apr 2016

been awarded as of today. That's probably pretty close to the percentage of the electorate, too. I don't have better numbers than that, though. The primaries are all about delegate selection, so only 41% or so of pledged delegates remain to be selected.

You're right, a number of states with large populations have not held primary events yet. By the end of April, more will have. The June 7 primaries will include California, the largest state, population-wise.

The link below is a great resource, and lets you look at primaries state-by-state, as well as nationally. I visit it frequently when I have questions:

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
16. Don't miss the individual state pages.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 01:23 PM
Apr 2016

Scroll down and click on the state abbreviation under Democratic Primaries to view not only results, but the methodology used in each state to allocate delegates. It's very interesting.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Following Wisconsin, Hill...