Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:57 AM Apr 2016

MATH Matters, chanting does not

Usually, when Hillary supporters chant "Math, math, math, math!" The point the are trying to make is the opposite of what the "Math" says.

The math, as it stands, is clear. Hillary has a formidable lead. Bernie needs about 56% of the remaining pledged delegates (still) to secure a majority of the pledged delegates. For the sake of argument, let's assume this is Bernie's only viable path to the nomination -- he secures the majority of pledged delegates and enough super delegates support that result to give him the nomination. Indeed, neither candidate will likely reach 2,383 (total majority) on pledged delegates alone.

What the math says, then, is that it is still possible for Bernie to win. It is mathematically possible for him to hit that mark. Is it likely? Probably not. It's going to be very hard to make happen. He has to nearly run the board. But that is not a mathematics analysis, that is a political analysis. Even if the politics said "Impossible," the math says the opposite, "Possible."

And looking ahead, if Bernie rolls into June 7 still needing 56% of the remaining pledged delegates, he is still mathematically viable. 694 pledged delegates are at stake. A lot of math to be had.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MATH Matters, chanting does not (Original Post) morningfog Apr 2016 OP
kick morningfog Apr 2016 #1
Kick morningfog Apr 2016 #2
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»MATH Matters, chanting do...