2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs the Clinton Campaign really aiming for a Pyrrhic Victory?
With her campaign now vowing scorched earth against Bernie Sanders, and to 'unify the party later,' are they out of their political minds or what is happening?
There is no way this is the strategy of a confident winner with an insurmountable lead, or this is the ravings of a campaign manager turned lunatic.
If she adopts this strategy she may yet claim the nomination, but mark my words, the Democrats will be doomed come GE time. This is a strategy with about the most short term egotistical methodology under the sun.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)any questions?
JPnoodleman
(454 posts).... Hillary, Hire me, I might be a Bernie supporter but come on, I could run a better campaign.
I'd at least not pull a dumb super-villain and reveal my evil plans. XD
Joob
(1,065 posts)and Hillary's campaign just did.
Even then he was still addressing issues.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)She does not seem to understand that Bernie's appeal is in part a protest against her candidacy. She does not get the fact that people are not happy with the status quo.
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)His slogan of "Not me, Us," is fitting.
The Left is dissatisfied with the parties Free Marketeering and service of Moloch and Mammon (SP?)
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)The Clintons have been selling out the American public for over 30 years. Why would she put the welfare of the general public above her own ambitions now?
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Freud would have a field day with the Clintons
Zira
(1,054 posts)scorched earth is only going to hurt her image further.
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)Lets face it they work, and Hillary can deny it.
Scotched Earth will merely swell the ranks. Even if they win they would only make Sanders a martyr. St. Bernie of the Left.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Zira
(1,054 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)that it was the Washington Times that was linked, or just that you can't provide any substantial reply?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)they have planned trying to link Sandy Hook to Bernie.
But I'm guessing none of the Hillary followers will decry that ridiculous dishonesty.
paulthompson
(2,398 posts)I've told my friends all along that Sanders needs two things to win: he needs to run a good race and Clinton needs to run a bad race. Both those things are happening.
Her smart move would have been to basically hug Sanders to death by saying that she'd seen the light, she'd realized the voters were angry and wanted drastic change, and she was going to give it to them. If she did that, he would have been sunk.
Clinton flirted with that for a while, but she's such a moderate/centrist by nature that she couldn't keep it going. Thank God. She's playing right into Sanders' hands with this new strategy, as Obama's chief strategist David Axelrod said on TV tonight.
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)To me this inability to read the political wind is kind of casting more doubt on her as a president.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Except lies. This liar already tried to throw that kitchen sink. It didn't work. Shit in one hand and Hillary Clinton's word in the other...I'd hate to wager on which one is worth more.
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)The party was, previously, poised to make great gains, but the Clinton family could dramatically undermine its vitality. She got too cocky thinking she would have a coronation and face off with Trump,
Now even if she wins it will be a brutal slog, destroy the party and she will face off against like the True Zodiac, whom is still weak but nowhere near the nightmare fuel of a Trump white house.
jfern
(5,204 posts)against Bernie and his supporters for a year now. They think they magically get the vote of the voters that they've said were fooled and are like the tea party.